在利比亚的黎波里,普通牙科医生和专家对修复诊所感染控制措施的态度

{"title":"在利比亚的黎波里,普通牙科医生和专家对修复诊所感染控制措施的态度","authors":"","doi":"10.47705/kjdmr.226205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives. Prosthodontics clinics require a high degree of concern regarding cross-infection of patients, personnel, unsterilized instruments, and equipment. Prosthodontics treatment undertaken in the clinics should be supplemented by the laboratory, and hence cross-infection chances have to be halted on both the fronts. The aim of this study was to evaluate attitudes regarding infection control procedures in prosthodontics clinics among general dentists, and specialists in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. A questionnaire of 11 questions was created and randomly distributed to 150 general dentists and specialists working in Tripoli's private clinics and public health centers. The questionnaire was anonymous and consisted of questions related to vaccination status, attitude and awareness towards infection control in prosthodontics clinics. Out of which (123) questionnaires were filled, giving a response rate of 82%. The data were sorted, checked, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results. A total of 123 dentists (68.3%) were general practitioners and (31.7%) were specialists, (39.9%) were males, and (60.1%) were females. In this study there was a positive correlation between vaccination status and the qualification (P =0.044). As (89.7%) of the specialists stated that they had been vaccinated against Hepatitis B virus, while only (73.8%) of general dentists had been vaccinated. The study also showed statistical significance when qualification was cross‑tabulated against the responses for various questions, that is, disinfection of rubber bowl (P = 0.027), sterilization of dental cast (P = 0.032), sterilization of metal framework (P =0.009), bite registration and bite block sterilization before sending to the dental laboratory (P =0.005), custom trays sterilization (P =0.005), and sterilization of the handpiece between cases (P = 0.000). The study also revealed that while just 11.9% of general dentists disinfect the impression prior to sending it to the dental laboratory, 23.1% of specialists do so after rinsing the impression. Conclusion. The findings of this study suggest that there are insufficient attitudes toward infection control procedures in prosthodontics practice. Furthermore, the implementation of selective standard precautions, such as hand hygiene compliance, was widely practiced by the Tripoli dentists surveyed.","PeriodicalId":436335,"journal":{"name":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitude of General Dental Practitioners and Specialists Toward Infection Control Measures in Prosthodontics Clinics in Tripoli, Libya\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.47705/kjdmr.226205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and objectives. Prosthodontics clinics require a high degree of concern regarding cross-infection of patients, personnel, unsterilized instruments, and equipment. Prosthodontics treatment undertaken in the clinics should be supplemented by the laboratory, and hence cross-infection chances have to be halted on both the fronts. The aim of this study was to evaluate attitudes regarding infection control procedures in prosthodontics clinics among general dentists, and specialists in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. A questionnaire of 11 questions was created and randomly distributed to 150 general dentists and specialists working in Tripoli's private clinics and public health centers. The questionnaire was anonymous and consisted of questions related to vaccination status, attitude and awareness towards infection control in prosthodontics clinics. Out of which (123) questionnaires were filled, giving a response rate of 82%. The data were sorted, checked, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results. A total of 123 dentists (68.3%) were general practitioners and (31.7%) were specialists, (39.9%) were males, and (60.1%) were females. In this study there was a positive correlation between vaccination status and the qualification (P =0.044). As (89.7%) of the specialists stated that they had been vaccinated against Hepatitis B virus, while only (73.8%) of general dentists had been vaccinated. The study also showed statistical significance when qualification was cross‑tabulated against the responses for various questions, that is, disinfection of rubber bowl (P = 0.027), sterilization of dental cast (P = 0.032), sterilization of metal framework (P =0.009), bite registration and bite block sterilization before sending to the dental laboratory (P =0.005), custom trays sterilization (P =0.005), and sterilization of the handpiece between cases (P = 0.000). The study also revealed that while just 11.9% of general dentists disinfect the impression prior to sending it to the dental laboratory, 23.1% of specialists do so after rinsing the impression. Conclusion. The findings of this study suggest that there are insufficient attitudes toward infection control procedures in prosthodontics practice. Furthermore, the implementation of selective standard precautions, such as hand hygiene compliance, was widely practiced by the Tripoli dentists surveyed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47705/kjdmr.226205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47705/kjdmr.226205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标。口腔修复诊所需要高度关注患者、人员、未消毒的器械和设备的交叉感染。在诊所进行的修复治疗应由实验室补充,因此必须在两个方面阻止交叉感染的机会。本研究的目的是评估利比亚的黎波里普通牙医和专科医生对口腔修复诊所感染控制程序的态度。方法。制作了一份包含11个问题的调查问卷,并随机分发给在的黎波里私人诊所和公共保健中心工作的150名普通牙医和专家。问卷采用匿名方式,问卷内容涉及口腔修复科门诊患者的疫苗接种状况、对感染控制的态度和意识。其中填写问卷123份,回复率82%。对这些数据进行分类、检查、制表和统计分析。结果。共有123名牙医为全科医生(68.3%),专科医生(31.7%),男性(39.9%)及女性(60.1%)。在本研究中,疫苗接种状况与资格呈正相关(P =0.044)。89.7%的专科医生表示他们接种过乙肝疫苗,而只有73.8%的普通牙医接种过乙肝疫苗。对橡胶碗的消毒(P = 0.027)、牙模的消毒(P = 0.032)、金属框架的消毒(P =0.009)、送到牙科实验室前的咬合登记和咬合块消毒(P =0.005)、定制托盘的消毒(P =0.005)、病例间手机的消毒(P = 0.000)等问题的回答进行交叉统计,结果也具有统计学意义。该研究还显示,只有11.9%的普通牙医在将牙模送到牙科实验室之前对其进行消毒,而23.1%的专科牙医在冲洗牙模后进行消毒。结论。本研究结果提示,在口腔修复实践中,对感染控制程序的态度不足。此外,接受调查的的黎波里牙医广泛实施了选择性标准预防措施,如遵守手部卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attitude of General Dental Practitioners and Specialists Toward Infection Control Measures in Prosthodontics Clinics in Tripoli, Libya
Background and objectives. Prosthodontics clinics require a high degree of concern regarding cross-infection of patients, personnel, unsterilized instruments, and equipment. Prosthodontics treatment undertaken in the clinics should be supplemented by the laboratory, and hence cross-infection chances have to be halted on both the fronts. The aim of this study was to evaluate attitudes regarding infection control procedures in prosthodontics clinics among general dentists, and specialists in Tripoli, Libya. Methods. A questionnaire of 11 questions was created and randomly distributed to 150 general dentists and specialists working in Tripoli's private clinics and public health centers. The questionnaire was anonymous and consisted of questions related to vaccination status, attitude and awareness towards infection control in prosthodontics clinics. Out of which (123) questionnaires were filled, giving a response rate of 82%. The data were sorted, checked, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results. A total of 123 dentists (68.3%) were general practitioners and (31.7%) were specialists, (39.9%) were males, and (60.1%) were females. In this study there was a positive correlation between vaccination status and the qualification (P =0.044). As (89.7%) of the specialists stated that they had been vaccinated against Hepatitis B virus, while only (73.8%) of general dentists had been vaccinated. The study also showed statistical significance when qualification was cross‑tabulated against the responses for various questions, that is, disinfection of rubber bowl (P = 0.027), sterilization of dental cast (P = 0.032), sterilization of metal framework (P =0.009), bite registration and bite block sterilization before sending to the dental laboratory (P =0.005), custom trays sterilization (P =0.005), and sterilization of the handpiece between cases (P = 0.000). The study also revealed that while just 11.9% of general dentists disinfect the impression prior to sending it to the dental laboratory, 23.1% of specialists do so after rinsing the impression. Conclusion. The findings of this study suggest that there are insufficient attitudes toward infection control procedures in prosthodontics practice. Furthermore, the implementation of selective standard precautions, such as hand hygiene compliance, was widely practiced by the Tripoli dentists surveyed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信