书评:认知的意义加工方法:什么重要?

L. Hettinger
{"title":"书评:认知的意义加工方法:什么重要?","authors":"L. Hettinger","doi":"10.1177/10648046211013031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches to designing sociotechnical systems have become increasingly apparent in recent years. The emergence of insightful, actionable syntheses across diverse perspectives on issues of common concern is among its greatest advantages. Successful design depends on effective integration of relevant knowledge from across a range of expertise, relentlessly focused on users’ needs and the safety and quality of their experience. John Flach and Fred Voorhorst’s recent book extends this approach in important, new directions that will greatly expand readers’ understanding of the interactions among perceptual, cognitive, and contextual factors underlying system performance and user experience. Their book provides a pragmatic synthesis of theory, research, and practice from human factors and ergonomics (HFE), cybernetics, literature, philosophy, systems engineering, and diverse domains within psychology. The result is an approach to design focused on understanding and delivering “what matters” to users. At a high level, the importance of understanding what matters to users and how to design systems to provide it stems from the issue’s increasing existential significance. In the midst of rapidly changing technologies, clarity regarding our relation to them as humans, as well as the professionals who design and work with them, is essential. The importance the authors attach to this awareness is conveyed in their references to Pirsig’s (1975) “Metaphysics of Quality,” the view that our occasional or persistent sense of alienation from the technologies we interact with and rely on stems from insufficient clarity about or perceived control over our relation to them. From a systems design perspective, “alienation” of this sort can manifest as errors, poor performance, or a decision to not purchase a particular product. For example, the recent progress in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ ML) clearly affords many novel uses, some with promise for improving human life (e.g., decision support in emergency management, safe and reliable control of autonomous vehicles, etc.). Unsurprisingly, there are many important, unresolved questions involving issues such as how ML algorithms should be developed and adapted over time to ensure safe interactions with underlying systems, or how real-time decisions are to be made regarding handoff of control in autonomous vehicles. Flach and Voorhorst’s treatment of the nature of complexity, circular causality, and the relevance of these concepts for systems design is one of the book’s best discussions, and highly relevant to issues involving AI/ML design. Not all systems share the complexity of AI/ML, of course, but Flach and Voorhorst’s approach remains just as relevant. Within HFE, there is a residual belief that systems thinking only applies to complex systems, like autonomous vehicles. Yet this could only be true if even the simplest objects existed in a sociotechnical vacuum of the type that simply does not exist. As they argue, comprehending and accounting for contextual factors, the sociotechnical ecology within which even comparatively simple devices will be used is critical in design. Having worked on the design of numerous types of complex and “simple” systems, I found the applicability of their approach across the full range of system complexity to be one of its most important features. At more detailed levels of systems design, the authors’ conceptualization of what matters encompasses the interrelated design objectives of satisfying, affording, and specifying. What are the user needs that a product or system seeks to address (satisfying), what sorts of functional possibilities do we hope to realize with our system (affording), and how can we best make those possibilities available to the user (specifying)? As they state, “If you want to shape the quality of human experience, you should be targeting these dimensions” (p. 53). The major sections of the book are dedicated to examinations of the means for achieving these overriding design goals. This book will greatly reward close and repeated reading. Its clearly explained perspectives are occasionally challenging, very frequently enlightening, and offer an important, emerging perspective on system design. Voorhorst’s illustrations are especially effective in illuminating the book’s themes. Readers will encounter diverse topics (e.g., control theory, heuristics, and decision making), some new and some familiar, explained and synthesized in ways that are intuitive and illuminating. Most important, they add an important, new perspective on perennial HFE issues. Any HFE professional involved in product or systems design or operation, regardless of the apparent level of complexity, will benefit from the authors’ ideas. Having followed Flach’s work for many years, it is immensely gratifying to see his ideas, and those of other great, contemporary systems thinkers such as Nancy Leveson and David Woods, having the greater influence they deserve. This most recent work, a product of ongoing collaborations with Fred Voorhorst, is a culmination of decades of research and theoretical exploration and provides a set of clear considerations and processes for system design. Voorhorst, in addition to his artistic and pedagogical talents as an illuminator of ideas, is a senior product manager of Noumena Digital AG, while Flach is a senior cognitive systems engineer with Mile Two, LLC. For both, delivering what matters to users is a concrete concern. In this book, they have produced a brilliant synthesis of data and theory from across an astonishing range of domains to fully support that objective.","PeriodicalId":357563,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Books Review: A Meaning Processing Approach to Cognition: What Matters?\",\"authors\":\"L. Hettinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10648046211013031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches to designing sociotechnical systems have become increasingly apparent in recent years. The emergence of insightful, actionable syntheses across diverse perspectives on issues of common concern is among its greatest advantages. Successful design depends on effective integration of relevant knowledge from across a range of expertise, relentlessly focused on users’ needs and the safety and quality of their experience. John Flach and Fred Voorhorst’s recent book extends this approach in important, new directions that will greatly expand readers’ understanding of the interactions among perceptual, cognitive, and contextual factors underlying system performance and user experience. Their book provides a pragmatic synthesis of theory, research, and practice from human factors and ergonomics (HFE), cybernetics, literature, philosophy, systems engineering, and diverse domains within psychology. The result is an approach to design focused on understanding and delivering “what matters” to users. At a high level, the importance of understanding what matters to users and how to design systems to provide it stems from the issue’s increasing existential significance. In the midst of rapidly changing technologies, clarity regarding our relation to them as humans, as well as the professionals who design and work with them, is essential. The importance the authors attach to this awareness is conveyed in their references to Pirsig’s (1975) “Metaphysics of Quality,” the view that our occasional or persistent sense of alienation from the technologies we interact with and rely on stems from insufficient clarity about or perceived control over our relation to them. From a systems design perspective, “alienation” of this sort can manifest as errors, poor performance, or a decision to not purchase a particular product. For example, the recent progress in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ ML) clearly affords many novel uses, some with promise for improving human life (e.g., decision support in emergency management, safe and reliable control of autonomous vehicles, etc.). Unsurprisingly, there are many important, unresolved questions involving issues such as how ML algorithms should be developed and adapted over time to ensure safe interactions with underlying systems, or how real-time decisions are to be made regarding handoff of control in autonomous vehicles. Flach and Voorhorst’s treatment of the nature of complexity, circular causality, and the relevance of these concepts for systems design is one of the book’s best discussions, and highly relevant to issues involving AI/ML design. Not all systems share the complexity of AI/ML, of course, but Flach and Voorhorst’s approach remains just as relevant. Within HFE, there is a residual belief that systems thinking only applies to complex systems, like autonomous vehicles. Yet this could only be true if even the simplest objects existed in a sociotechnical vacuum of the type that simply does not exist. As they argue, comprehending and accounting for contextual factors, the sociotechnical ecology within which even comparatively simple devices will be used is critical in design. Having worked on the design of numerous types of complex and “simple” systems, I found the applicability of their approach across the full range of system complexity to be one of its most important features. At more detailed levels of systems design, the authors’ conceptualization of what matters encompasses the interrelated design objectives of satisfying, affording, and specifying. What are the user needs that a product or system seeks to address (satisfying), what sorts of functional possibilities do we hope to realize with our system (affording), and how can we best make those possibilities available to the user (specifying)? As they state, “If you want to shape the quality of human experience, you should be targeting these dimensions” (p. 53). The major sections of the book are dedicated to examinations of the means for achieving these overriding design goals. This book will greatly reward close and repeated reading. Its clearly explained perspectives are occasionally challenging, very frequently enlightening, and offer an important, emerging perspective on system design. Voorhorst’s illustrations are especially effective in illuminating the book’s themes. Readers will encounter diverse topics (e.g., control theory, heuristics, and decision making), some new and some familiar, explained and synthesized in ways that are intuitive and illuminating. Most important, they add an important, new perspective on perennial HFE issues. Any HFE professional involved in product or systems design or operation, regardless of the apparent level of complexity, will benefit from the authors’ ideas. Having followed Flach’s work for many years, it is immensely gratifying to see his ideas, and those of other great, contemporary systems thinkers such as Nancy Leveson and David Woods, having the greater influence they deserve. This most recent work, a product of ongoing collaborations with Fred Voorhorst, is a culmination of decades of research and theoretical exploration and provides a set of clear considerations and processes for system design. Voorhorst, in addition to his artistic and pedagogical talents as an illuminator of ideas, is a senior product manager of Noumena Digital AG, while Flach is a senior cognitive systems engineer with Mile Two, LLC. For both, delivering what matters to users is a concrete concern. In this book, they have produced a brilliant synthesis of data and theory from across an astonishing range of domains to fully support that objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211013031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046211013031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,设计社会技术系统的跨学科方法的好处变得越来越明显。就共同关心的问题,从不同角度提出有见地的、可操作的综合意见是其最大的优势之一。成功的设计依赖于对各种专业知识的有效整合,坚持不懈地关注用户的需求以及用户体验的安全性和质量。John Flach和Fred Voorhorst的新书在重要的新方向上扩展了这种方法,这将极大地扩展读者对系统性能和用户体验背后的感知、认知和上下文因素之间相互作用的理解。他们的书提供了一个实用的综合理论,研究和实践,从人的因素和人体工程学(HFE),控制论,文学,哲学,系统工程和心理学的不同领域。其结果是一种专注于理解和交付“对用户重要的”的设计方法。在高层次上,理解什么对用户重要以及如何设计系统来提供它的重要性源于这个问题日益增长的存在意义。在快速变化的技术中,明确我们与人类的关系,以及与他们一起设计和工作的专业人员,是至关重要的。作者对这种意识的重视体现在他们对皮尔西格(1975)的“质量形而上学”的引用中,该观点认为,我们偶尔或持续地对我们与之互动和依赖的技术产生疏离感,源于对我们与它们的关系不够清晰或感知控制。从系统设计的角度来看,这种类型的“异化”可以表现为错误、糟糕的性能或不购买特定产品的决定。例如,人工智能和机器学习(AI/ ML)的最新进展显然提供了许多新的用途,其中一些有望改善人类生活(例如,应急管理中的决策支持,自动驾驶汽车的安全可靠控制等)。不出所料,有许多重要的、未解决的问题涉及到如何开发和适应机器学习算法,以确保与底层系统的安全交互,或者如何在自动驾驶汽车的控制权移交方面做出实时决策。Flach和Voorhorst对复杂性本质、循环因果关系以及这些概念与系统设计的相关性的处理是本书中最好的讨论之一,并且与涉及AI/ML设计的问题高度相关。当然,并非所有系统都具有AI/ML的复杂性,但Flach和Voorhorst的方法仍然具有相关性。在HFE内部,有一种残留的信念认为,系统思维只适用于复杂的系统,比如自动驾驶汽车。然而,只有当最简单的物体存在于一种根本不存在的社会技术真空中时,这才可能是正确的。正如他们所说,理解和考虑环境因素,社会技术生态在设计中是至关重要的,即使是相对简单的设备也会被使用。在设计了许多类型的复杂和“简单”系统之后,我发现他们的方法在整个系统复杂性范围内的适用性是其最重要的特征之一。在更详细的系统设计层次上,作者对重要事项的概念化包含了满足、提供和指定这些相互关联的设计目标。产品或系统寻求解决(满足)的用户需求是什么,我们希望通过我们的系统实现哪些功能可能性(提供),以及我们如何最好地为用户提供这些可能性(指定)?正如他们所说,“如果你想塑造人类体验的质量,你应该瞄准这些维度”(第53页)。这本书的主要部分是专门为实现这些压倒一切的设计目标的手段的检查。这本书非常值得仔细阅读和反复阅读。书中解释清楚的观点偶尔具有挑战性,但也经常具有启发性,并为系统设计提供了重要的新兴观点。沃霍斯特的插图特别有效地阐明了书中的主题。读者将遇到不同的主题(例如,控制理论,启发式和决策制定),有些是新的,有些是熟悉的,以直观和启发性的方式解释和综合。最重要的是,它们为长期存在的HFE问题提供了一个重要的新视角。任何参与产品或系统设计或操作的HFE专业人员,无论其表面上的复杂程度如何,都将受益于作者的想法。 我追随弗拉赫的工作多年,看到他的思想以及南希·莱韦森(Nancy Leveson)和大卫·伍兹(David Woods)等其他伟大的当代系统思想家的思想产生了应有的更大影响,我感到非常欣慰。这项最新的工作是与Fred Voorhorst持续合作的产物,是数十年研究和理论探索的高潮,并为系统设计提供了一套清晰的考虑和过程。Voorhorst除了在艺术和教学方面的天赋外,还是Noumena Digital AG的高级产品经理,而Flach是Mile Two, LLC的高级认知系统工程师。对他们来说,为用户提供重要的东西是一个具体的问题。在这本书中,他们出色地综合了来自各个领域的数据和理论,以完全支持这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Books Review: A Meaning Processing Approach to Cognition: What Matters?
The benefits of transdisciplinary approaches to designing sociotechnical systems have become increasingly apparent in recent years. The emergence of insightful, actionable syntheses across diverse perspectives on issues of common concern is among its greatest advantages. Successful design depends on effective integration of relevant knowledge from across a range of expertise, relentlessly focused on users’ needs and the safety and quality of their experience. John Flach and Fred Voorhorst’s recent book extends this approach in important, new directions that will greatly expand readers’ understanding of the interactions among perceptual, cognitive, and contextual factors underlying system performance and user experience. Their book provides a pragmatic synthesis of theory, research, and practice from human factors and ergonomics (HFE), cybernetics, literature, philosophy, systems engineering, and diverse domains within psychology. The result is an approach to design focused on understanding and delivering “what matters” to users. At a high level, the importance of understanding what matters to users and how to design systems to provide it stems from the issue’s increasing existential significance. In the midst of rapidly changing technologies, clarity regarding our relation to them as humans, as well as the professionals who design and work with them, is essential. The importance the authors attach to this awareness is conveyed in their references to Pirsig’s (1975) “Metaphysics of Quality,” the view that our occasional or persistent sense of alienation from the technologies we interact with and rely on stems from insufficient clarity about or perceived control over our relation to them. From a systems design perspective, “alienation” of this sort can manifest as errors, poor performance, or a decision to not purchase a particular product. For example, the recent progress in artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ ML) clearly affords many novel uses, some with promise for improving human life (e.g., decision support in emergency management, safe and reliable control of autonomous vehicles, etc.). Unsurprisingly, there are many important, unresolved questions involving issues such as how ML algorithms should be developed and adapted over time to ensure safe interactions with underlying systems, or how real-time decisions are to be made regarding handoff of control in autonomous vehicles. Flach and Voorhorst’s treatment of the nature of complexity, circular causality, and the relevance of these concepts for systems design is one of the book’s best discussions, and highly relevant to issues involving AI/ML design. Not all systems share the complexity of AI/ML, of course, but Flach and Voorhorst’s approach remains just as relevant. Within HFE, there is a residual belief that systems thinking only applies to complex systems, like autonomous vehicles. Yet this could only be true if even the simplest objects existed in a sociotechnical vacuum of the type that simply does not exist. As they argue, comprehending and accounting for contextual factors, the sociotechnical ecology within which even comparatively simple devices will be used is critical in design. Having worked on the design of numerous types of complex and “simple” systems, I found the applicability of their approach across the full range of system complexity to be one of its most important features. At more detailed levels of systems design, the authors’ conceptualization of what matters encompasses the interrelated design objectives of satisfying, affording, and specifying. What are the user needs that a product or system seeks to address (satisfying), what sorts of functional possibilities do we hope to realize with our system (affording), and how can we best make those possibilities available to the user (specifying)? As they state, “If you want to shape the quality of human experience, you should be targeting these dimensions” (p. 53). The major sections of the book are dedicated to examinations of the means for achieving these overriding design goals. This book will greatly reward close and repeated reading. Its clearly explained perspectives are occasionally challenging, very frequently enlightening, and offer an important, emerging perspective on system design. Voorhorst’s illustrations are especially effective in illuminating the book’s themes. Readers will encounter diverse topics (e.g., control theory, heuristics, and decision making), some new and some familiar, explained and synthesized in ways that are intuitive and illuminating. Most important, they add an important, new perspective on perennial HFE issues. Any HFE professional involved in product or systems design or operation, regardless of the apparent level of complexity, will benefit from the authors’ ideas. Having followed Flach’s work for many years, it is immensely gratifying to see his ideas, and those of other great, contemporary systems thinkers such as Nancy Leveson and David Woods, having the greater influence they deserve. This most recent work, a product of ongoing collaborations with Fred Voorhorst, is a culmination of decades of research and theoretical exploration and provides a set of clear considerations and processes for system design. Voorhorst, in addition to his artistic and pedagogical talents as an illuminator of ideas, is a senior product manager of Noumena Digital AG, while Flach is a senior cognitive systems engineer with Mile Two, LLC. For both, delivering what matters to users is a concrete concern. In this book, they have produced a brilliant synthesis of data and theory from across an astonishing range of domains to fully support that objective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信