{"title":"基因型与环境互作对黄瓜产量的影响","authors":"A. Iwo, O. E. Odor","doi":"10.4314/GJASS.V17I1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was performed to analyze the genotype x environment (G×E) interaction for fruit yield of 5 genotypes in four environments; Ikom, Calabar, Obubra and Obudu located at different agro-ecological zones of Cross River State. The cucumber genotypes were grown in randomized complete block design in three replicates in 2015 cropping season. The yield data was analyzed using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype plus genotype by environment (GGE). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance showed statistically significant effect of genotypes, environments and the genotype x environment interaction (P < 0.01%). The environment explained 59.59%which showed high differences in variety response to different locations tested. Genotype (G) and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) accounted 15.83% and 11.89% respectively. The first interaction principal component axis (IPCA1) was significant (P < 0.01) except the (IPCA 2) and explained 11.50% and 0.36% of the G X E sum of squares respectively. The Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction stability value (ASV) showed that significant difference existed in the G x E component. Based on the stability parameters, it revealed that none of the genotypes were stable for fruit yield, however according to ASV, and GGE Bi-plot graphical representation, Ashley genotype in relative terms was stable. The genotypes Poinsett (48.43 t ha -1 ) , Ashley(47.49 t ha -1 ) and Marketer (41.66 t ha -1 ) were considered to have adaptability to favorable environments, while Market More (MM 13.97t ha -1 ) and Super Marketer (SM 16.66 t ha -1 ) adapted to unfavorable conditions for fruit yield. Based on AMMI and GGE bi-plot, ASL had the widest adaptation and was considered as the ideal genotype, whereas P.ST showed specific adaptation. The ideal environments were IKOM (66.85 t ha -1 ) and OBURA (56.93 t ha -1 ). Through the GGE bi-plot and AMMI analysis, the superior genotypes identified could serve as references for genotype evaluation and inclusion in further testing in other seasons and environments. Keywords: Environment, Genotype, Interaction, Stability and Yield","PeriodicalId":250072,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genotype x environment interaction for fruit yield of some cucumber (Cucumissativus) genotypes\",\"authors\":\"A. Iwo, O. E. Odor\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/GJASS.V17I1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study was performed to analyze the genotype x environment (G×E) interaction for fruit yield of 5 genotypes in four environments; Ikom, Calabar, Obubra and Obudu located at different agro-ecological zones of Cross River State. The cucumber genotypes were grown in randomized complete block design in three replicates in 2015 cropping season. The yield data was analyzed using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype plus genotype by environment (GGE). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance showed statistically significant effect of genotypes, environments and the genotype x environment interaction (P < 0.01%). The environment explained 59.59%which showed high differences in variety response to different locations tested. Genotype (G) and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) accounted 15.83% and 11.89% respectively. The first interaction principal component axis (IPCA1) was significant (P < 0.01) except the (IPCA 2) and explained 11.50% and 0.36% of the G X E sum of squares respectively. The Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction stability value (ASV) showed that significant difference existed in the G x E component. Based on the stability parameters, it revealed that none of the genotypes were stable for fruit yield, however according to ASV, and GGE Bi-plot graphical representation, Ashley genotype in relative terms was stable. The genotypes Poinsett (48.43 t ha -1 ) , Ashley(47.49 t ha -1 ) and Marketer (41.66 t ha -1 ) were considered to have adaptability to favorable environments, while Market More (MM 13.97t ha -1 ) and Super Marketer (SM 16.66 t ha -1 ) adapted to unfavorable conditions for fruit yield. Based on AMMI and GGE bi-plot, ASL had the widest adaptation and was considered as the ideal genotype, whereas P.ST showed specific adaptation. The ideal environments were IKOM (66.85 t ha -1 ) and OBURA (56.93 t ha -1 ). Through the GGE bi-plot and AMMI analysis, the superior genotypes identified could serve as references for genotype evaluation and inclusion in further testing in other seasons and environments. Keywords: Environment, Genotype, Interaction, Stability and Yield\",\"PeriodicalId\":250072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/GJASS.V17I1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GJASS.V17I1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究分析了5个基因型在4种环境下与环境(G×E)互作对果实产量的影响;Ikom、Calabar、Obubra和Obudu位于克罗斯河州不同的农业生态区。采用随机完全区组设计,分3个重复在2015年种植季进行黄瓜基因型培养。采用可加性主效应和乘法互作(AMMI)和基因型加环境基因型(GGE)对产量数据进行分析。加性主效应和乘法互作(AMMI)方差分析显示基因型、环境和基因型x环境互作的影响有统计学意义(P < 0.01%)。环境解释了59.59%,表明品种对不同地点的响应存在较大差异。基因型(G)和基因型x环境互作(G x E)分别占15.83%和11.89%。第一互作主成分轴(IPCA1)除ipca2外均极显著(P < 0.01),分别解释gxe平方和的11.50%和0.36%。加性主效应和乘性相互作用稳定值(ASV)表明,G x E组分存在显著差异。稳定性参数表明,所有基因型对果实产量都不稳定,但根据ASV和GGE双图表示,Ashley基因型相对稳定。Poinsett (48.43 t ha -1)、Ashley(47.49 t ha -1)和Marketer (41.66 t ha -1)基因型对有利环境具有适应性,而Market More (MM 13.97t ha -1)和Super Marketer (SM 16.66 t ha -1)基因型对不利环境具有适应性。基于AMMI和GGE双图,ASL具有最广泛的适应性,被认为是理想的基因型,而P.ST具有特异性的适应性。理想环境为IKOM (66.85 t / -1)和OBURA (56.93 t / -1)。通过GGE双图和AMMI分析,鉴定出的优势基因型可作为其他季节和环境下进一步检测的基因型评价和纳入参考。关键词:环境,基因型,互作,稳定性和产量
Genotype x environment interaction for fruit yield of some cucumber (Cucumissativus) genotypes
The present study was performed to analyze the genotype x environment (G×E) interaction for fruit yield of 5 genotypes in four environments; Ikom, Calabar, Obubra and Obudu located at different agro-ecological zones of Cross River State. The cucumber genotypes were grown in randomized complete block design in three replicates in 2015 cropping season. The yield data was analyzed using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype plus genotype by environment (GGE). Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of variance showed statistically significant effect of genotypes, environments and the genotype x environment interaction (P < 0.01%). The environment explained 59.59%which showed high differences in variety response to different locations tested. Genotype (G) and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) accounted 15.83% and 11.89% respectively. The first interaction principal component axis (IPCA1) was significant (P < 0.01) except the (IPCA 2) and explained 11.50% and 0.36% of the G X E sum of squares respectively. The Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction stability value (ASV) showed that significant difference existed in the G x E component. Based on the stability parameters, it revealed that none of the genotypes were stable for fruit yield, however according to ASV, and GGE Bi-plot graphical representation, Ashley genotype in relative terms was stable. The genotypes Poinsett (48.43 t ha -1 ) , Ashley(47.49 t ha -1 ) and Marketer (41.66 t ha -1 ) were considered to have adaptability to favorable environments, while Market More (MM 13.97t ha -1 ) and Super Marketer (SM 16.66 t ha -1 ) adapted to unfavorable conditions for fruit yield. Based on AMMI and GGE bi-plot, ASL had the widest adaptation and was considered as the ideal genotype, whereas P.ST showed specific adaptation. The ideal environments were IKOM (66.85 t ha -1 ) and OBURA (56.93 t ha -1 ). Through the GGE bi-plot and AMMI analysis, the superior genotypes identified could serve as references for genotype evaluation and inclusion in further testing in other seasons and environments. Keywords: Environment, Genotype, Interaction, Stability and Yield