{"title":"声望与利润","authors":"B. Khan","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190936075.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Royal Society of Arts offered honorary and cash awards for creativity. The society initially was averse to patents and prohibited the award of prizes for patented inventions. Inventors of items that were valuable in the marketplace typically chose to obtain patents and to bypass the prize system. Owing to such adverse selection, prizes were negatively related to subsequent areas of important technological discovery. The society acknowledged that its efforts had been “futile” because of its hostility to patents and switched from offering inducement prizes toward lobbying for reforms to strengthen the patent system. The findings suggest some skepticism is warranted about claims that elites and non-market-oriented institutions generated technological innovation and long-term economic development.","PeriodicalId":423757,"journal":{"name":"Inventing Ideas","volume":"205 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prestige and Profit\",\"authors\":\"B. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190936075.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Royal Society of Arts offered honorary and cash awards for creativity. The society initially was averse to patents and prohibited the award of prizes for patented inventions. Inventors of items that were valuable in the marketplace typically chose to obtain patents and to bypass the prize system. Owing to such adverse selection, prizes were negatively related to subsequent areas of important technological discovery. The society acknowledged that its efforts had been “futile” because of its hostility to patents and switched from offering inducement prizes toward lobbying for reforms to strengthen the patent system. The findings suggest some skepticism is warranted about claims that elites and non-market-oriented institutions generated technological innovation and long-term economic development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inventing Ideas\",\"volume\":\"205 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inventing Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190936075.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inventing Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190936075.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
英国皇家艺术学会(Royal Society of Arts)为创造力提供了荣誉奖和现金奖。该协会最初反对专利,并禁止为专利发明颁发奖金。在市场上有价值的产品的发明者通常会选择获得专利,绕过奖励制度。由于这种逆向选择,奖项与随后的重要技术发现领域负相关。该协会承认,由于其对专利的敌意,它的努力是“徒劳的”,并从提供诱导奖转向游说改革,以加强专利制度。研究结果表明,对于精英和非市场导向机构产生技术创新和长期经济发展的说法,有必要提出一些质疑。
The Royal Society of Arts offered honorary and cash awards for creativity. The society initially was averse to patents and prohibited the award of prizes for patented inventions. Inventors of items that were valuable in the marketplace typically chose to obtain patents and to bypass the prize system. Owing to such adverse selection, prizes were negatively related to subsequent areas of important technological discovery. The society acknowledged that its efforts had been “futile” because of its hostility to patents and switched from offering inducement prizes toward lobbying for reforms to strengthen the patent system. The findings suggest some skepticism is warranted about claims that elites and non-market-oriented institutions generated technological innovation and long-term economic development.