竞赛性质:从最佳对策构造竞赛成功函数

Luis C. Corchón, Marco Serena
{"title":"竞赛性质:从最佳对策构造竞赛成功函数","authors":"Luis C. Corchón, Marco Serena","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2882537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We aim at characterizing which kind of functions can be rationalized as the best reply of payo¤-maximizing agents in contests for a fixed prize. We show that the rationalizability strongly di¤ers between Decisive Contests, where the prize is allocated with certainty, and Possibly Indecisive Contests, where the prize may not be awarded. In the latter, any arbitrary set of best reply functions is rationalizable, thus \"anything goes.\" In the former, and on the contrary, the best reply functions have to satisfy strong conditions.","PeriodicalId":300059,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","volume":"13 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Properties of Contests: Constructing contest success functions from best-responses\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Luis C. Corchón, Marco Serena\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2882537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We aim at characterizing which kind of functions can be rationalized as the best reply of payo¤-maximizing agents in contests for a fixed prize. We show that the rationalizability strongly di¤ers between Decisive Contests, where the prize is allocated with certainty, and Possibly Indecisive Contests, where the prize may not be awarded. In the latter, any arbitrary set of best reply functions is rationalizable, thus \\\"anything goes.\\\" In the former, and on the contrary, the best reply functions have to satisfy strong conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":300059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"13 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882537\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Tax Law & Public Finance Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882537","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们的目的是描述哪一类函数可以被合理化为payo¤-最大化代理在固定奖励竞争中的最佳回答。我们发现合理性强烈di¤存在于决定性竞赛(其中奖项的分配是确定的)和可能不授予奖项的非决定性竞赛(可能不授予奖项)之间。在后一种情况下,任何一组任意的最佳回复函数都是合理的,因此“一切皆可”。在前者和相反的情况下,最佳回复函数必须满足强条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Properties of Contests: Constructing contest success functions from best-responses"
We aim at characterizing which kind of functions can be rationalized as the best reply of payo¤-maximizing agents in contests for a fixed prize. We show that the rationalizability strongly di¤ers between Decisive Contests, where the prize is allocated with certainty, and Possibly Indecisive Contests, where the prize may not be awarded. In the latter, any arbitrary set of best reply functions is rationalizable, thus "anything goes." In the former, and on the contrary, the best reply functions have to satisfy strong conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信