P19虚拟病房和急诊科出院:COVID大流行第2阶段后的临床结果和建议

ER Bradley, HJ Petty, J. Brackston, W. Khan, S. Brij
{"title":"P19虚拟病房和急诊科出院:COVID大流行第2阶段后的临床结果和建议","authors":"ER Bradley, HJ Petty, J. Brackston, W. Khan, S. Brij","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"P19 Figure 1Results119 COVNA patients identified (female 65 (55%);77 (66%) BAME;median age 51 years, IQR 38–62, range 16–88). Over half (55%) were between the ages 40 and 69. COVNA patients were relatively free from co-morbidity: 104 (87%) had low or intermediate risk ISARIC 4C scores;all had Charlson co-morbidity score of less than 9 representing low 10 year mortality.Median length of stay on VCW was 3 days (IQR 3–8, range 0–15);median number of calls undertaken was 3 (IQR 2–5, range 0–9).32 (27%) COVNA patients returned to ED, 8 of whom were discharged home with an overall admission rate 20%. Re-presentations within 5/7 were predominantly COVID related (20/23;87%). After 5 days, there were no attendances with worsening pneumonitis (figure 1). The commonest route for re-attendance was self-referral (17/32;53%) of whom 14 were admitted;all 10 persons referred to ED from VCW were admitted.COVNA patients issued with a saturation probe (48%) were more likely to re-present and be admitted (RR 2.2;95% CI 1.03–4.74;p0.0425).2 (1.7%) sustained pulmonary emboli;1 intensive care admission;4 patients died (3% unadjusted mortality).ConclusionsCOVNA patients have low mortality and morbidity from COVID. The VCW model has safely and successfully supported COVNA patients who are deemed fit enough to not require admission (clinical judgment and no oxygen requirement). Ideally, all COVNA patients should be issued with a saturation probe. COVNA patients should be warned that re-presentation and admission may be required. Worsening of symptoms and/or a drop in oxygen saturation should warrant return to ED. This pathway should be continued in COVID endemic phase.","PeriodicalId":319670,"journal":{"name":"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P19 COVID Virtual Ward and Emergency Department discharges: clinical outcomes and recommendations following COVID pandemic phase 2\",\"authors\":\"ER Bradley, HJ Petty, J. Brackston, W. Khan, S. Brij\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"P19 Figure 1Results119 COVNA patients identified (female 65 (55%);77 (66%) BAME;median age 51 years, IQR 38–62, range 16–88). Over half (55%) were between the ages 40 and 69. COVNA patients were relatively free from co-morbidity: 104 (87%) had low or intermediate risk ISARIC 4C scores;all had Charlson co-morbidity score of less than 9 representing low 10 year mortality.Median length of stay on VCW was 3 days (IQR 3–8, range 0–15);median number of calls undertaken was 3 (IQR 2–5, range 0–9).32 (27%) COVNA patients returned to ED, 8 of whom were discharged home with an overall admission rate 20%. Re-presentations within 5/7 were predominantly COVID related (20/23;87%). After 5 days, there were no attendances with worsening pneumonitis (figure 1). The commonest route for re-attendance was self-referral (17/32;53%) of whom 14 were admitted;all 10 persons referred to ED from VCW were admitted.COVNA patients issued with a saturation probe (48%) were more likely to re-present and be admitted (RR 2.2;95% CI 1.03–4.74;p0.0425).2 (1.7%) sustained pulmonary emboli;1 intensive care admission;4 patients died (3% unadjusted mortality).ConclusionsCOVNA patients have low mortality and morbidity from COVID. The VCW model has safely and successfully supported COVNA patients who are deemed fit enough to not require admission (clinical judgment and no oxygen requirement). Ideally, all COVNA patients should be issued with a saturation probe. COVNA patients should be warned that re-presentation and admission may be required. Worsening of symptoms and/or a drop in oxygen saturation should warrant return to ED. This pathway should be continued in COVID endemic phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virtual monitoring in COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

图1结果鉴定出119例冠状病毒感染患者(女性65例(55%),BAME 77例(66%),中位年龄51岁,IQR 38 ~ 62,范围16 ~ 88)。超过一半(55%)的人年龄在40到69岁之间。冠状病毒感染患者相对没有共发病:104例(87%)患者的ISARIC 4C评分为低或中危;所有患者的Charlson共发病评分均低于9分,表明10年死亡率较低。VCW的中位住院时间为3天(IQR 3 - 8,范围0-15);就诊次数中位数为3次(IQR 2-5,范围0-9)(27%) COVNA患者返回急诊科,其中8例出院,总入院率为20%。5/7以内的复诊主要与COVID相关(20/23;87%)。5天后,没有患者因肺炎恶化而再次就诊(图1)。最常见的重新就诊途径是自我转诊(17/32,53%),其中14人入院;所有10名从VCW转诊至ED的患者均入院。使用饱和探针的冠状病毒感染患者(48%)更有可能再次出现并入院(RR 2.2;95% CI 1.03-4.74;p0.0425)1例入院重症监护;4例死亡(未经调整死亡率3%)。结论scovna患者病死率和发病率较低。VCW模型安全成功地支持了那些被认为足够健康而不需要住院的冠状病毒感染患者(临床判断和不需要氧气)。理想情况下,所有冠状病毒感染患者都应使用饱和探针。应警告冠状病毒感染者可能需要再次出现并入院。症状恶化和/或血氧饱和度下降应使患者返回ED。在COVID流行阶段应继续这一途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
P19 COVID Virtual Ward and Emergency Department discharges: clinical outcomes and recommendations following COVID pandemic phase 2
P19 Figure 1Results119 COVNA patients identified (female 65 (55%);77 (66%) BAME;median age 51 years, IQR 38–62, range 16–88). Over half (55%) were between the ages 40 and 69. COVNA patients were relatively free from co-morbidity: 104 (87%) had low or intermediate risk ISARIC 4C scores;all had Charlson co-morbidity score of less than 9 representing low 10 year mortality.Median length of stay on VCW was 3 days (IQR 3–8, range 0–15);median number of calls undertaken was 3 (IQR 2–5, range 0–9).32 (27%) COVNA patients returned to ED, 8 of whom were discharged home with an overall admission rate 20%. Re-presentations within 5/7 were predominantly COVID related (20/23;87%). After 5 days, there were no attendances with worsening pneumonitis (figure 1). The commonest route for re-attendance was self-referral (17/32;53%) of whom 14 were admitted;all 10 persons referred to ED from VCW were admitted.COVNA patients issued with a saturation probe (48%) were more likely to re-present and be admitted (RR 2.2;95% CI 1.03–4.74;p0.0425).2 (1.7%) sustained pulmonary emboli;1 intensive care admission;4 patients died (3% unadjusted mortality).ConclusionsCOVNA patients have low mortality and morbidity from COVID. The VCW model has safely and successfully supported COVNA patients who are deemed fit enough to not require admission (clinical judgment and no oxygen requirement). Ideally, all COVNA patients should be issued with a saturation probe. COVNA patients should be warned that re-presentation and admission may be required. Worsening of symptoms and/or a drop in oxygen saturation should warrant return to ED. This pathway should be continued in COVID endemic phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信