{"title":"苜蓿产量差距:证据综述","authors":"Michael P. Russelle","doi":"10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Alfalfa Yield Gap: A Review of the Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Russelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.