苜蓿产量差距:证据综述

Michael P. Russelle
{"title":"苜蓿产量差距:证据综述","authors":"Michael P. Russelle","doi":"10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.</p>","PeriodicalId":100549,"journal":{"name":"Forage & Grazinglands","volume":"11 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Alfalfa Yield Gap: A Review of the Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Michael P. Russelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa</i> L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forage & Grazinglands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forage & Grazinglands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1094/FG-2013-0002-RV","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

从田间规模管理到国家政策决定,许多目的都需要了解可行的作物产量。对于紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.),美国最广泛使用的产量估计是国家农业统计局(National Agriculture Statistics Service)的全农场报告,该报告基于农民对总产量的估计。这些报告结合了建立年和生产年的收成,这可能会无意中降低对生产年林分的产量预期。然而,一些报告的产量高得不切实际,这表明饲料产量报告存在以前未报告的问题。本文介绍了从小块到整个农场规模的新信息总结,这些信息支持以下结论:西部灌溉条件下干干草产量(13%水分)大于8吨/英亩是可行的,东部许多州非灌溉条件下产量大于6吨/英亩是可行的。在大多数州,普通生产商和顶级生产商之间的产量差距为2至3倍。弥补这一差距将大大提高农场的盈利能力和产品的可得性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Alfalfa Yield Gap: A Review of the Evidence

Knowledge of feasibly attainable crop yields is needed for many purposes, from field-scale management to national policy decisions. For alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the most widely used estimates of yield in the US are whole-farm reports from the National Agriculture Statistics Service, which are based on the farmer's estimates of total production. These reports combine establishment-year and production-year harvests, which may inadvertently reduce yield expectations for production-year stands. However, some reported yields were unrealistically high, indicating a previously unreported problem with forage yield reports. This article presents new summaries of information from the small-plot to the whole-farm scale, which support the conclusion that dry hay yields (13% moisture) greater than 8 tons/acre are feasible under irrigation in the West and yields greater than 6 tons/acre are feasible under nonirrigated conditions in many states in the East. There is a yield gap of 2- to threefold between average and top-tier producers in most states. Bridging that gap should greatly improve farm profitability and availability of the product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信