预测协同药物与DNN和GAT的相互作用

Nichakorn Numcharoenpinij, T. Termsaithong, P. Phunchongharn, Supanida Piyayotai
{"title":"预测协同药物与DNN和GAT的相互作用","authors":"Nichakorn Numcharoenpinij, T. Termsaithong, P. Phunchongharn, Supanida Piyayotai","doi":"10.1109/ICKII55100.2022.9983579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many complex diseases such as cancer cannot be effectively treated with one type of medication, giving rise to another treatment route that combines several drugs to achieve the desired effects. We developed deep learning models to predict a parameter that gauges such effects known as synergy score and specifically made use of relevant genetic and drug datasets. The expected outcome enables rapid identification of novel drug pairs with potential use in cancer therapy. The employed genetic datasets included gene expression, copy number variation, and somatic mutation. We applied different variations of autoencoders on these datasets, namely deep autoencoder, sparse autoencoder, and deep sparse autoencoder to reduce the dimensions and only retain what was deemed non-redundant. Alternatively, we filtered the data based on landmark gene names. As for the training drug datasets that contained associated synergy scores calculated empirically, we either used ECFP6 molecular fingerprint representations as an input for a deep neural network (DNN) or a molecular graph for a graph neural network (GNN) model. We set out to compare the performance of these two representations in appropriate deep learning models as well as determine how well each autoencoder method fared. Among different autoencoders, the best performing option was the sparse autoencoder for DNN and the deep autoencoder for GNN. After loading the processed genetic datasets into ECFP6-DNN and graph embedding-GNN model, we found that ECFP6-DNN performed better with a mean square error of 146.137, while graph embedding-GNN had a mean square error of 174.952.","PeriodicalId":352222,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII )","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Synergistic Drug Interaction with DNN and GAT\",\"authors\":\"Nichakorn Numcharoenpinij, T. Termsaithong, P. Phunchongharn, Supanida Piyayotai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICKII55100.2022.9983579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many complex diseases such as cancer cannot be effectively treated with one type of medication, giving rise to another treatment route that combines several drugs to achieve the desired effects. We developed deep learning models to predict a parameter that gauges such effects known as synergy score and specifically made use of relevant genetic and drug datasets. The expected outcome enables rapid identification of novel drug pairs with potential use in cancer therapy. The employed genetic datasets included gene expression, copy number variation, and somatic mutation. We applied different variations of autoencoders on these datasets, namely deep autoencoder, sparse autoencoder, and deep sparse autoencoder to reduce the dimensions and only retain what was deemed non-redundant. Alternatively, we filtered the data based on landmark gene names. As for the training drug datasets that contained associated synergy scores calculated empirically, we either used ECFP6 molecular fingerprint representations as an input for a deep neural network (DNN) or a molecular graph for a graph neural network (GNN) model. We set out to compare the performance of these two representations in appropriate deep learning models as well as determine how well each autoencoder method fared. Among different autoencoders, the best performing option was the sparse autoencoder for DNN and the deep autoencoder for GNN. After loading the processed genetic datasets into ECFP6-DNN and graph embedding-GNN model, we found that ECFP6-DNN performed better with a mean square error of 146.137, while graph embedding-GNN had a mean square error of 174.952.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII )\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII )\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKII55100.2022.9983579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 5th International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII )","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKII55100.2022.9983579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

许多复杂的疾病,如癌症,不能用一种药物有效地治疗,这就产生了另一种治疗途径,即结合几种药物来达到预期的效果。我们开发了深度学习模型来预测衡量这种效应的参数,即协同得分,并特别利用了相关的遗传和药物数据集。预期的结果使在癌症治疗中具有潜在用途的新药物对的快速鉴定。采用的遗传数据集包括基因表达、拷贝数变异和体细胞突变。我们在这些数据集上应用了不同的自编码器,即深度自编码器,稀疏自编码器和深度稀疏自编码器,以降低维度并仅保留被认为是非冗余的内容。或者,我们根据具有里程碑意义的基因名称过滤数据。对于包含经验计算的相关协同得分的训练药物数据集,我们要么使用ECFP6分子指纹表示作为深度神经网络(DNN)的输入,要么使用分子图作为图神经网络(GNN)模型的输入。我们开始比较这两种表示在适当的深度学习模型中的性能,并确定每种自动编码器方法的表现如何。在不同的自编码器中,表现最好的是DNN的稀疏自编码器和GNN的深度自编码器。将处理后的遗传数据集加载到ECFP6-DNN和图嵌入- gnn模型中,我们发现ECFP6-DNN的均方误差为146.137,而图嵌入- gnn的均方误差为174.952。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Synergistic Drug Interaction with DNN and GAT
Many complex diseases such as cancer cannot be effectively treated with one type of medication, giving rise to another treatment route that combines several drugs to achieve the desired effects. We developed deep learning models to predict a parameter that gauges such effects known as synergy score and specifically made use of relevant genetic and drug datasets. The expected outcome enables rapid identification of novel drug pairs with potential use in cancer therapy. The employed genetic datasets included gene expression, copy number variation, and somatic mutation. We applied different variations of autoencoders on these datasets, namely deep autoencoder, sparse autoencoder, and deep sparse autoencoder to reduce the dimensions and only retain what was deemed non-redundant. Alternatively, we filtered the data based on landmark gene names. As for the training drug datasets that contained associated synergy scores calculated empirically, we either used ECFP6 molecular fingerprint representations as an input for a deep neural network (DNN) or a molecular graph for a graph neural network (GNN) model. We set out to compare the performance of these two representations in appropriate deep learning models as well as determine how well each autoencoder method fared. Among different autoencoders, the best performing option was the sparse autoencoder for DNN and the deep autoencoder for GNN. After loading the processed genetic datasets into ECFP6-DNN and graph embedding-GNN model, we found that ECFP6-DNN performed better with a mean square error of 146.137, while graph embedding-GNN had a mean square error of 174.952.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信