公共汽车和火车的安全

D. B. Hess
{"title":"公共汽车和火车的安全","authors":"D. B. Hess","doi":"10.1300/J460v01n04_11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Public transit systems in the United States facilitate trade, business, and tourism, and buses and trains provide transportation for about 30 million riders each workday in large metropolitan areas, small cities, and rural places. For transit dependents, older adults, and those with mobility limitations, public transit provides a critical lifeline to work, shopping, healthcare, and socialization. Unlike aviation security, which was subject to mandated federal reform following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, security reforms on public transit have been ad hoc, as the nation's several hundred transit systems are locally owned and controlled and subject only to federal oversight. During the last two years, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have issued warnings that extremists may attack public transit in the U.S. like they did on buses and tubes in London in July, 2005. Public transit is attractive to extremists for terror attacks—between 1991 and 2001, 42 percent of terror attacks worldwide were made on rail systems or buses—because the systems are located in central places, attract large crowds, and provide unrestricted access to all. To date, most of the federal antiterror funding for public transit has been spent on security awareness for front-line employees and first responders and incident management training. This article performs a literature review of past research and provides recommendations on needed research on technological innovations to prevent and thwart attacks, particularly those that begin to physically and technologically “close” public transit systems and reduce unrestricted access.","PeriodicalId":345897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Security Education","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security on Buses and Trains\",\"authors\":\"D. B. Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J460v01n04_11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Public transit systems in the United States facilitate trade, business, and tourism, and buses and trains provide transportation for about 30 million riders each workday in large metropolitan areas, small cities, and rural places. For transit dependents, older adults, and those with mobility limitations, public transit provides a critical lifeline to work, shopping, healthcare, and socialization. Unlike aviation security, which was subject to mandated federal reform following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, security reforms on public transit have been ad hoc, as the nation's several hundred transit systems are locally owned and controlled and subject only to federal oversight. During the last two years, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have issued warnings that extremists may attack public transit in the U.S. like they did on buses and tubes in London in July, 2005. Public transit is attractive to extremists for terror attacks—between 1991 and 2001, 42 percent of terror attacks worldwide were made on rail systems or buses—because the systems are located in central places, attract large crowds, and provide unrestricted access to all. To date, most of the federal antiterror funding for public transit has been spent on security awareness for front-line employees and first responders and incident management training. This article performs a literature review of past research and provides recommendations on needed research on technological innovations to prevent and thwart attacks, particularly those that begin to physically and technologically “close” public transit systems and reduce unrestricted access.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Security Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Security Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J460v01n04_11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

美国的公共交通系统促进了贸易、商业和旅游,公共汽车和火车在每个工作日为大城市、小城市和农村地区的约3000万乘客提供运输。对于依赖交通的人、老年人和行动不便的人来说,公共交通为工作、购物、医疗和社交提供了重要的生命线。与2001年9月11日恐怖袭击后由联邦政府强制改革的航空安全不同,公共交通的安全改革是临时的,因为全国数百个交通系统由地方拥有和控制,只受联邦政府的监督。在过去的两年里,美国国土安全部和联邦调查局发出警告,极端分子可能会像2005年7月在伦敦的公共汽车和地铁上所做的那样,袭击美国的公共交通工具。公共交通对极端分子的恐怖袭击很有吸引力——1991年至2001年间,全球42%的恐怖袭击是针对铁路系统或公共汽车的——因为这些系统位于中心地带,吸引大量人群,并提供不受限制的访问。到目前为止,大部分用于公共交通的联邦反恐资金都花在了一线员工和急救人员的安全意识以及事件管理培训上。本文对过去的研究进行了文献回顾,并就预防和挫败攻击的技术创新提供了必要的研究建议,特别是那些开始在物理和技术上“关闭”公共交通系统并减少无限制访问的攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security on Buses and Trains
Abstract Public transit systems in the United States facilitate trade, business, and tourism, and buses and trains provide transportation for about 30 million riders each workday in large metropolitan areas, small cities, and rural places. For transit dependents, older adults, and those with mobility limitations, public transit provides a critical lifeline to work, shopping, healthcare, and socialization. Unlike aviation security, which was subject to mandated federal reform following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, security reforms on public transit have been ad hoc, as the nation's several hundred transit systems are locally owned and controlled and subject only to federal oversight. During the last two years, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the FBI have issued warnings that extremists may attack public transit in the U.S. like they did on buses and tubes in London in July, 2005. Public transit is attractive to extremists for terror attacks—between 1991 and 2001, 42 percent of terror attacks worldwide were made on rail systems or buses—because the systems are located in central places, attract large crowds, and provide unrestricted access to all. To date, most of the federal antiterror funding for public transit has been spent on security awareness for front-line employees and first responders and incident management training. This article performs a literature review of past research and provides recommendations on needed research on technological innovations to prevent and thwart attacks, particularly those that begin to physically and technologically “close” public transit systems and reduce unrestricted access.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信