两种最优负载平衡的系统状态计算算法

A. Winckler
{"title":"两种最优负载平衡的系统状态计算算法","authors":"A. Winckler","doi":"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author introduces and explains two algorithms, OFCup and OFCdown, allowing one to calculate the global state of a decentralized distributed system by interpreting measurements that are easy to obtain to facilitate cooperative optimal load balancing without a central job dispatcher. The information required is exchanged using the communication protocol of a receiver-initiated load balancing policy and does not induce any additional message transmission overhead. The author presents and interprets measurements from simulation. These studies show that the performance of systems applying any of the OFCx algorithms is significantly better than a no-information policy called 'random routing' and induces only little additional waiting time compared to the M/D/n model. This is true even for high transmission times relative to the mean time between system state changes. Both algorithms are shown to perform equally well under normal conditions with better variance values of OFC-down, but the degradation of OFCdown is significantly worse than that of OFCup, if the not-accept-counter is not incremented at the time expected.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":265469,"journal":{"name":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two system state calculation algorithms for optimal load balancing\",\"authors\":\"A. Winckler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author introduces and explains two algorithms, OFCup and OFCdown, allowing one to calculate the global state of a decentralized distributed system by interpreting measurements that are easy to obtain to facilitate cooperative optimal load balancing without a central job dispatcher. The information required is exchanged using the communication protocol of a receiver-initiated load balancing policy and does not induce any additional message transmission overhead. The author presents and interprets measurements from simulation. These studies show that the performance of systems applying any of the OFCx algorithms is significantly better than a no-information policy called 'random routing' and induces only little additional waiting time compared to the M/D/n model. This is true even for high transmission times relative to the mean time between system state changes. Both algorithms are shown to perform equally well under normal conditions with better variance values of OFC-down, but the degradation of OFCdown is significantly worse than that of OFCup, if the not-accept-counter is not incremented at the time expected.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":265469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

作者介绍并解释了OFCup和OFCdown两种算法,允许人们通过解释易于获得的测量值来计算分散分布式系统的全局状态,以促进协作最优负载平衡,而无需中央作业调度程序。使用接收方发起的负载平衡策略的通信协议交换所需的信息,并且不会引起任何额外的消息传输开销。作者给出并解释了仿真测量结果。这些研究表明,应用任何OFCx算法的系统性能明显优于称为“随机路由”的无信息策略,并且与M/D/n模型相比,只引起很少的额外等待时间。即使对于相对于系统状态变化之间的平均时间的高传输时间也是如此。这两种算法在正常条件下都表现得同样好,OFC-down的方差值更好,但如果不接受计数器在预期时间内增加,OFCdown的退化明显比OFCup更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two system state calculation algorithms for optimal load balancing
The author introduces and explains two algorithms, OFCup and OFCdown, allowing one to calculate the global state of a decentralized distributed system by interpreting measurements that are easy to obtain to facilitate cooperative optimal load balancing without a central job dispatcher. The information required is exchanged using the communication protocol of a receiver-initiated load balancing policy and does not induce any additional message transmission overhead. The author presents and interprets measurements from simulation. These studies show that the performance of systems applying any of the OFCx algorithms is significantly better than a no-information policy called 'random routing' and induces only little additional waiting time compared to the M/D/n model. This is true even for high transmission times relative to the mean time between system state changes. Both algorithms are shown to perform equally well under normal conditions with better variance values of OFC-down, but the degradation of OFCdown is significantly worse than that of OFCup, if the not-accept-counter is not incremented at the time expected.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信