诊断可靠性

A. Huda
{"title":"诊断可靠性","authors":"A. Huda","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliability of a diagnosis can be measured as either agreement with a reference criterion or agreement between clinicians as to a diagnosis. Most psychiatric and some general medical diagnostic constructs are identified on the basis of a clinical picture, not using a reference criterion such as laboratory tests. Most psychiatric diagnostic constructs have moderate to substantial reliability in research studies. They are likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Measures such as standardizing interviews can improve reliability. General medical diagnostic constructs have similar reliability to psychiatric diagnostic constructs in research studies and are also likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Even with laboratory tests, some medical conditions are hard to distinguish due to similarities in their clinical pictures. For alternative mental health classifications, psychological formulation—except psychodynamic formulation—is less reliable than psychiatric diagnosis. Symptom-based classification has at least equal reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. Dimension-based classification has equivalent reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. These may be combined with diagnosis but may have less usefulness on their own for other functions, e.g. administrative.","PeriodicalId":106646,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Model in Mental Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"A. Huda\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliability of a diagnosis can be measured as either agreement with a reference criterion or agreement between clinicians as to a diagnosis. Most psychiatric and some general medical diagnostic constructs are identified on the basis of a clinical picture, not using a reference criterion such as laboratory tests. Most psychiatric diagnostic constructs have moderate to substantial reliability in research studies. They are likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Measures such as standardizing interviews can improve reliability. General medical diagnostic constructs have similar reliability to psychiatric diagnostic constructs in research studies and are also likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Even with laboratory tests, some medical conditions are hard to distinguish due to similarities in their clinical pictures. For alternative mental health classifications, psychological formulation—except psychodynamic formulation—is less reliable than psychiatric diagnosis. Symptom-based classification has at least equal reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. Dimension-based classification has equivalent reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. These may be combined with diagnosis but may have less usefulness on their own for other functions, e.g. administrative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical Model in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical Model in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Model in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198807254.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

诊断的可靠性可以通过与参考标准的一致或临床医生对诊断的一致来衡量。大多数精神病学和一些一般医学诊断结构是根据临床情况确定的,而不是使用实验室检查等参考标准。大多数精神病学诊断结构在研究中具有中等到实质性的可靠性。它们在临床实践中可能不太可靠。标准化面试等措施可以提高可靠性。一般医学诊断结构在研究中与精神病学诊断结构具有相似的可靠性,但在临床实践中也可能不太可靠。即使通过实验室测试,一些疾病也很难区分,因为它们的临床表现相似。对于其他的精神健康分类,除了精神动力学的表述,心理学的表述比精神病学的诊断更不可靠。基于症状的分类与精神病学诊断至少具有相同的可靠性。基于维度的分类与精神病诊断具有同等的可靠性。这些可以与诊断相结合,但单独用于其他功能(如行政管理)可能用处不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of diagnosis
Reliability of a diagnosis can be measured as either agreement with a reference criterion or agreement between clinicians as to a diagnosis. Most psychiatric and some general medical diagnostic constructs are identified on the basis of a clinical picture, not using a reference criterion such as laboratory tests. Most psychiatric diagnostic constructs have moderate to substantial reliability in research studies. They are likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Measures such as standardizing interviews can improve reliability. General medical diagnostic constructs have similar reliability to psychiatric diagnostic constructs in research studies and are also likely to be less reliable in clinical practice. Even with laboratory tests, some medical conditions are hard to distinguish due to similarities in their clinical pictures. For alternative mental health classifications, psychological formulation—except psychodynamic formulation—is less reliable than psychiatric diagnosis. Symptom-based classification has at least equal reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. Dimension-based classification has equivalent reliability to psychiatric diagnosis. These may be combined with diagnosis but may have less usefulness on their own for other functions, e.g. administrative.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信