论投机检查点理论:时间和精力的考虑

Omer Subasi, S. Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"论投机检查点理论:时间和精力的考虑","authors":"Omer Subasi, S. Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1145/3203217.3203232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collective checkpoint/rollback is the most popular approach for dealing with fail-stop errors on high-performance computing platforms. Prior work has focused on choosing checkpoint intervals that minimize the total cost of checkpoint/rollback. This work introduces the notion of speculative checkpointing, where we probabilistically skip some checkpoints. The careful selection of checkpoints either to be taken or skipped has the potential to reduce the total checkpoint/rollback overhead. We mathematically formulate the overall checkpoint/rollback cost in the presence of speculation. We consider the choice of speculation as a fixed probability or a probability distribution. We formulate two criteria to be minimized: total execution time and approximate total energy. We derive the criteria for beneficial speculative checkpointing for exponential and arbitrary failure distributions. Furthermore, we analyze the joint optimization of energy and time to express the trade-offs mathematically. We validate the formulations and evaluate various scenarios using discrete-event simulation. Experimental evaluation validates the models and demonstrates that employing speculation and choosing to speculate by sampling a distribution derived from the failure distribution achieves the best performance.","PeriodicalId":127096,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","volume":"253 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the theory of speculative checkpointing: time and energy considerations\",\"authors\":\"Omer Subasi, S. Krishnamoorthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3203217.3203232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collective checkpoint/rollback is the most popular approach for dealing with fail-stop errors on high-performance computing platforms. Prior work has focused on choosing checkpoint intervals that minimize the total cost of checkpoint/rollback. This work introduces the notion of speculative checkpointing, where we probabilistically skip some checkpoints. The careful selection of checkpoints either to be taken or skipped has the potential to reduce the total checkpoint/rollback overhead. We mathematically formulate the overall checkpoint/rollback cost in the presence of speculation. We consider the choice of speculation as a fixed probability or a probability distribution. We formulate two criteria to be minimized: total execution time and approximate total energy. We derive the criteria for beneficial speculative checkpointing for exponential and arbitrary failure distributions. Furthermore, we analyze the joint optimization of energy and time to express the trade-offs mathematically. We validate the formulations and evaluate various scenarios using discrete-event simulation. Experimental evaluation validates the models and demonstrates that employing speculation and choosing to speculate by sampling a distribution derived from the failure distribution achieves the best performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"253 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3203217.3203232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3203217.3203232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

集体检查点/回滚是在高性能计算平台上处理故障停止错误最流行的方法。先前的工作集中于选择检查点间隔,使检查点/回滚的总成本最小化。这项工作引入了推测性检查点的概念,我们可能会跳过一些检查点。仔细选择要采取或跳过的检查点有可能减少检查点/回滚的总开销。在存在投机的情况下,我们用数学方法制定了总体检查点/回滚成本。我们考虑选择一个固定的概率或一个概率分布。我们制定了最小化的两个标准:总执行时间和近似总能量。我们导出了指数型和任意型失效分布的有利推测检查点准则。此外,我们分析了能量和时间的联合优化,以数学方式表达了权衡。我们使用离散事件模拟验证公式并评估各种场景。实验验证了模型的有效性,并表明采用推测和选择通过从失效分布中得到的分布抽样进行推测可获得最佳性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the theory of speculative checkpointing: time and energy considerations
Collective checkpoint/rollback is the most popular approach for dealing with fail-stop errors on high-performance computing platforms. Prior work has focused on choosing checkpoint intervals that minimize the total cost of checkpoint/rollback. This work introduces the notion of speculative checkpointing, where we probabilistically skip some checkpoints. The careful selection of checkpoints either to be taken or skipped has the potential to reduce the total checkpoint/rollback overhead. We mathematically formulate the overall checkpoint/rollback cost in the presence of speculation. We consider the choice of speculation as a fixed probability or a probability distribution. We formulate two criteria to be minimized: total execution time and approximate total energy. We derive the criteria for beneficial speculative checkpointing for exponential and arbitrary failure distributions. Furthermore, we analyze the joint optimization of energy and time to express the trade-offs mathematically. We validate the formulations and evaluate various scenarios using discrete-event simulation. Experimental evaluation validates the models and demonstrates that employing speculation and choosing to speculate by sampling a distribution derived from the failure distribution achieves the best performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信