女法官判断得更好吗?

U. Schultz
{"title":"女法官判断得更好吗?","authors":"U. Schultz","doi":"10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i3.111104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"First of all a look back: In 1900 for the first time ever women had the chance to enroll in law faculties in Germany, by 1912 they took part in the first state examination following legal education at university for the first time and only in 1919 were they admitted to practical legal training. This was followed by an intense debate about whether women could and should practise law. The arguments were:","PeriodicalId":130064,"journal":{"name":"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Female Judges Judge Better?\",\"authors\":\"U. Schultz\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i3.111104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"First of all a look back: In 1900 for the first time ever women had the chance to enroll in law faculties in Germany, by 1912 they took part in the first state examination following legal education at university for the first time and only in 1919 were they admitted to practical legal training. This was followed by an intense debate about whether women could and should practise law. The arguments were:\",\"PeriodicalId\":130064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i3.111104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nnjlsr.v0i3.111104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

首先回顾一下:1900年,女性第一次有机会进入德国的法律学院,到1912年,她们第一次参加了大学法律教育后的第一次国家考试,直到1919年,她们才被允许接受实际的法律培训。随之而来的是一场关于女性是否可以和应该从事法律工作的激烈辩论。这些论点是:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Female Judges Judge Better?
First of all a look back: In 1900 for the first time ever women had the chance to enroll in law faculties in Germany, by 1912 they took part in the first state examination following legal education at university for the first time and only in 1919 were they admitted to practical legal training. This was followed by an intense debate about whether women could and should practise law. The arguments were:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信