重新审视欧洲的身份危机

S. Hoffmann
{"title":"重新审视欧洲的身份危机","authors":"S. Hoffmann","doi":"10.4324/9780429310652-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ALMOST THIRTY YEARS AGO, I WROTE AN ESSAY for this journal about Western Europe which began by calling it prosperous and disunited. I then stated: \"Europe today has no clear identity, no profile other than that which a process of industrializa tion and a process of economic integration have given it. Europe today has no sense of direction and purpose.\"1 In 1994, this judg ment remains valid, even though so much has happened in the past ten years alone: the relance of the mid-1980s, the end of the Cold War and of Europe's division into two armed camps, and the longest recession since the Great Depression. In 1964, my opening paragraph ended bravely: \"This essay laments its absence\" (i.e., the absence of a sense of direction and purpose) \"and calls for its rebirth.\" I am more sober now: I only propose an analysis. It is ironic that the crisis of the European Community (EC, now called the European Union [EU]) appears to have begun immediately after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty on European Union, which seemed to promise a major leap forwards. A monetary union, with a single central bank and a single currency, was going, within less than ten years, to crown the enterprise of economic integration begun in 1957 and expanded by the \"1992\" program of the mid-1980s (the so-called Single Act). The Community's juris diction was going to extend to areas beyond the economic realm: social affairs, police matters, immigration?areas close to the core of domestic sovereignty?as well as to diplomacy and defense. A year and a half later, deep pessimism prevails. The French nation en","PeriodicalId":200501,"journal":{"name":"The European Sisyphus","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Europe's Identity Crisis Revisited\",\"authors\":\"S. Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429310652-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ALMOST THIRTY YEARS AGO, I WROTE AN ESSAY for this journal about Western Europe which began by calling it prosperous and disunited. I then stated: \\\"Europe today has no clear identity, no profile other than that which a process of industrializa tion and a process of economic integration have given it. Europe today has no sense of direction and purpose.\\\"1 In 1994, this judg ment remains valid, even though so much has happened in the past ten years alone: the relance of the mid-1980s, the end of the Cold War and of Europe's division into two armed camps, and the longest recession since the Great Depression. In 1964, my opening paragraph ended bravely: \\\"This essay laments its absence\\\" (i.e., the absence of a sense of direction and purpose) \\\"and calls for its rebirth.\\\" I am more sober now: I only propose an analysis. It is ironic that the crisis of the European Community (EC, now called the European Union [EU]) appears to have begun immediately after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty on European Union, which seemed to promise a major leap forwards. A monetary union, with a single central bank and a single currency, was going, within less than ten years, to crown the enterprise of economic integration begun in 1957 and expanded by the \\\"1992\\\" program of the mid-1980s (the so-called Single Act). The Community's juris diction was going to extend to areas beyond the economic realm: social affairs, police matters, immigration?areas close to the core of domestic sovereignty?as well as to diplomacy and defense. A year and a half later, deep pessimism prevails. The French nation en\",\"PeriodicalId\":200501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Sisyphus\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Sisyphus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429310652-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Sisyphus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429310652-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

大约三十年前,我为本刊写了一篇关于西欧的文章,开篇就说西欧繁荣而分裂。我接着说:“今天的欧洲没有明确的身份,没有轮廓,除了工业化进程和经济一体化进程赋予它的轮廓。今天的欧洲没有方向感和目标感。到1994年,这一判断仍然有效,尽管仅在过去十年就发生了这么多事情:20世纪80年代中期的复苏,冷战和欧洲分裂为两个武装阵营的结束,以及自大萧条以来持续时间最长的经济衰退。1964年,我的开篇段落勇敢地结束了:“这篇文章哀叹它的缺失”(即缺乏方向感和目的感)。“并要求它重生。”我现在清醒多了:我只是提出一个分析。具有讽刺意味的是,欧洲共同体(EC,现在称为欧盟[EU])的危机似乎是在欧盟马斯特里赫特条约签署后立即开始的,该条约似乎承诺了一个重大的飞跃。一个拥有单一中央银行和单一货币的货币联盟,在不到十年的时间里,就完成了1957年开始的经济一体化事业,并通过20世纪80年代中期的“1992”计划(所谓的“单一法案”)进行了扩展。共同体的管辖权将扩展到经济领域以外的领域:社会事务、警察事务、移民问题。靠近国内主权核心的地区?还有外交和国防。一年半之后,悲观情绪弥漫。法兰西民族
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Europe's Identity Crisis Revisited
ALMOST THIRTY YEARS AGO, I WROTE AN ESSAY for this journal about Western Europe which began by calling it prosperous and disunited. I then stated: "Europe today has no clear identity, no profile other than that which a process of industrializa tion and a process of economic integration have given it. Europe today has no sense of direction and purpose."1 In 1994, this judg ment remains valid, even though so much has happened in the past ten years alone: the relance of the mid-1980s, the end of the Cold War and of Europe's division into two armed camps, and the longest recession since the Great Depression. In 1964, my opening paragraph ended bravely: "This essay laments its absence" (i.e., the absence of a sense of direction and purpose) "and calls for its rebirth." I am more sober now: I only propose an analysis. It is ironic that the crisis of the European Community (EC, now called the European Union [EU]) appears to have begun immediately after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty on European Union, which seemed to promise a major leap forwards. A monetary union, with a single central bank and a single currency, was going, within less than ten years, to crown the enterprise of economic integration begun in 1957 and expanded by the "1992" program of the mid-1980s (the so-called Single Act). The Community's juris diction was going to extend to areas beyond the economic realm: social affairs, police matters, immigration?areas close to the core of domestic sovereignty?as well as to diplomacy and defense. A year and a half later, deep pessimism prevails. The French nation en
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信