风险监管的法律与经济学

C. Coglianese
{"title":"风险监管的法律与经济学","authors":"C. Coglianese","doi":"10.1002/9780470400531.EORMS0454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law plays a central role in the management of risk in society. The rules adopted by regulatory agencies now affect nearly every facet of the economy, and as such regulation has motivated a substantial body of academic research. Law and economics research on regulation has, first, demonstrated the normative justification for governmental intervention in the marketplace based on the concept of market failure. Second, political economy research on regulation has shown how, as a positive matter, interest groups, political movements, and public pressure affect the stringency of such regulation, sometimes more than any normative rationale for regulation. Third, risk regulation research has clarified the available normative principles that can guide the selection of regulatory stringency, from the zero-risk principle to cost-benefit balancing. Finally, the law and economics literature on risk regulation offers lessons about the form or design of regulatory instruments, from traditional “command-and-control” standards to more innovative possibilities, such as market-based instruments or management-based regulation. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \nrisk regulation; \nlaw and economics; \nregulatory instrument choice; \nbenefit-cost analysis","PeriodicalId":258454,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Structure of Government & Separation of Powers (Topic)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Law and Economics of Risk Regulation\",\"authors\":\"C. Coglianese\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/9780470400531.EORMS0454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Law plays a central role in the management of risk in society. The rules adopted by regulatory agencies now affect nearly every facet of the economy, and as such regulation has motivated a substantial body of academic research. Law and economics research on regulation has, first, demonstrated the normative justification for governmental intervention in the marketplace based on the concept of market failure. Second, political economy research on regulation has shown how, as a positive matter, interest groups, political movements, and public pressure affect the stringency of such regulation, sometimes more than any normative rationale for regulation. Third, risk regulation research has clarified the available normative principles that can guide the selection of regulatory stringency, from the zero-risk principle to cost-benefit balancing. Finally, the law and economics literature on risk regulation offers lessons about the form or design of regulatory instruments, from traditional “command-and-control” standards to more innovative possibilities, such as market-based instruments or management-based regulation. \\n \\n \\nKeywords: \\n \\nrisk regulation; \\nlaw and economics; \\nregulatory instrument choice; \\nbenefit-cost analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":258454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Structure of Government & Separation of Powers (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Structure of Government & Separation of Powers (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.EORMS0454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Structure of Government & Separation of Powers (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470400531.EORMS0454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

法律在社会风险管理中起着核心作用。如今,监管机构所采用的规则几乎影响到经济的方方面面,因此,监管激励了大量的学术研究。关于监管的法律和经济学研究首先证明了基于市场失灵概念的政府干预市场的规范性正当性。其次,关于监管的政治经济学研究表明,作为一个积极的问题,利益集团、政治运动和公众压力如何影响这种监管的严格程度,有时比任何监管的规范性理由都要重要。第三,风险监管研究明确了从零风险原则到成本效益平衡,现有的规范原则可以指导监管严格程度的选择。最后,有关风险监管的法律和经济学文献提供了有关监管工具形式或设计的经验教训,从传统的“命令与控制”标准到更具创新性的可能性,如基于市场的工具或基于管理的监管。关键词:风险监管;法律与经济;监管工具的选择;收益成本分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Law and Economics of Risk Regulation
Law plays a central role in the management of risk in society. The rules adopted by regulatory agencies now affect nearly every facet of the economy, and as such regulation has motivated a substantial body of academic research. Law and economics research on regulation has, first, demonstrated the normative justification for governmental intervention in the marketplace based on the concept of market failure. Second, political economy research on regulation has shown how, as a positive matter, interest groups, political movements, and public pressure affect the stringency of such regulation, sometimes more than any normative rationale for regulation. Third, risk regulation research has clarified the available normative principles that can guide the selection of regulatory stringency, from the zero-risk principle to cost-benefit balancing. Finally, the law and economics literature on risk regulation offers lessons about the form or design of regulatory instruments, from traditional “command-and-control” standards to more innovative possibilities, such as market-based instruments or management-based regulation. Keywords: risk regulation; law and economics; regulatory instrument choice; benefit-cost analysis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信