三坐标测量机球度误差的最优控制方法

O. V. Zakharov, I. Bobrovskij, Nikolaj M. Bobrovskij, A. Korolev, A. V. Kochetkov, V. Ivashchenko
{"title":"三坐标测量机球度误差的最优控制方法","authors":"O. V. Zakharov, I. Bobrovskij, Nikolaj M. Bobrovskij, A. Korolev, A. V. Kochetkov, V. Ivashchenko","doi":"10.1109/DYNAMICS.2016.7819113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Spherical surfaces are utilized widely in precision bearing, MEMS and parts of precision engineering. Constantly growing needs in the high motion performance of spherical parts, sphericity error is becoming an indispensable component in the control of form error. However, currently the quality control of a spherical surface is restricted by the lack of science-based mathematical models. This paper presents a unified approach to evaluate sphericity error using three methods: Least Square Sphere, Minimum Zone Sphere, Maximum Inscribed Sphere. The research originated from the need compare the effectiveness of these methods for different requirements for measurement accuracy. Three experiments are used to verify the effectiveness of the methods with 28, 36 and 50 datasets measured on Coordinate Measuring Machines. Presents a mathematical models of sphericity measurement and comparative results of the verification of these models.","PeriodicalId":293543,"journal":{"name":"2016 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal control method for the sphericity error using CMMs\",\"authors\":\"O. V. Zakharov, I. Bobrovskij, Nikolaj M. Bobrovskij, A. Korolev, A. V. Kochetkov, V. Ivashchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DYNAMICS.2016.7819113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Spherical surfaces are utilized widely in precision bearing, MEMS and parts of precision engineering. Constantly growing needs in the high motion performance of spherical parts, sphericity error is becoming an indispensable component in the control of form error. However, currently the quality control of a spherical surface is restricted by the lack of science-based mathematical models. This paper presents a unified approach to evaluate sphericity error using three methods: Least Square Sphere, Minimum Zone Sphere, Maximum Inscribed Sphere. The research originated from the need compare the effectiveness of these methods for different requirements for measurement accuracy. Three experiments are used to verify the effectiveness of the methods with 28, 36 and 50 datasets measured on Coordinate Measuring Machines. Presents a mathematical models of sphericity measurement and comparative results of the verification of these models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DYNAMICS.2016.7819113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Dynamics of Systems, Mechanisms and Machines (Dynamics)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DYNAMICS.2016.7819113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

球面广泛应用于精密轴承、微机电系统和精密工程的零件中。在对球面零件高运动性能的需求不断增长的今天,球度误差正成为形状误差控制中不可缺少的组成部分。然而,目前球面的质量控制由于缺乏科学的数学模型而受到限制。利用最小二乘球、最小带球、最大内切球三种方法,提出了一种统一的球度误差评价方法。该研究源于需要比较这些方法的有效性,以满足不同的测量精度要求。用三坐标测量机上测量的28、36和50个数据集验证了方法的有效性。提出了球度测量的数学模型,并对这些模型进行了对比验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal control method for the sphericity error using CMMs
Spherical surfaces are utilized widely in precision bearing, MEMS and parts of precision engineering. Constantly growing needs in the high motion performance of spherical parts, sphericity error is becoming an indispensable component in the control of form error. However, currently the quality control of a spherical surface is restricted by the lack of science-based mathematical models. This paper presents a unified approach to evaluate sphericity error using three methods: Least Square Sphere, Minimum Zone Sphere, Maximum Inscribed Sphere. The research originated from the need compare the effectiveness of these methods for different requirements for measurement accuracy. Three experiments are used to verify the effectiveness of the methods with 28, 36 and 50 datasets measured on Coordinate Measuring Machines. Presents a mathematical models of sphericity measurement and comparative results of the verification of these models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信