两极分化与数字媒体的作用

Micol Burighel
{"title":"两极分化与数字媒体的作用","authors":"Micol Burighel","doi":"10.33112/nm.14.2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordicum and Mediterranean Studies (DOI code, author's name and issue details are available on the journal's website) Group polarization is a serious and worrying phenomenon developing in democratic societies. It occurs «when members of a deliberating group move toward a more extreme point in whatever direction is indicated by the members’ predeliberation tendency» (Sunstein, 1999: 3-4). As a result, after a discussion where different points of view emerge, people tend to align to the opinion they were already tending to, before the discussion itself. For example, if confronted with someone that supports a different position, people who believe that vaccines are linked to autism will adhere to their pre-existing perspectives with much more conviction; the same will occur between left-leaning voters or pro-feminist activists and so on.","PeriodicalId":273795,"journal":{"name":"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polarization and the Role of Digital Media\",\"authors\":\"Micol Burighel\",\"doi\":\"10.33112/nm.14.2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordicum and Mediterranean Studies (DOI code, author's name and issue details are available on the journal's website) Group polarization is a serious and worrying phenomenon developing in democratic societies. It occurs «when members of a deliberating group move toward a more extreme point in whatever direction is indicated by the members’ predeliberation tendency» (Sunstein, 1999: 3-4). As a result, after a discussion where different points of view emerge, people tend to align to the opinion they were already tending to, before the discussion itself. For example, if confronted with someone that supports a different position, people who believe that vaccines are linked to autism will adhere to their pre-existing perspectives with much more conviction; the same will occur between left-leaning voters or pro-feminist activists and so on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.14.2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Us’ vs. ‘Them’: The rhetoric of ‘othering’ from Aristotle to Frank Westerman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.14.2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Nordicum-Mediterraneum。冰岛Nordicum和地中海研究电子期刊(DOI代码,作者的名字和细节问题都可以在《华尔街日报》网站)群体极化是一种非常严重的、令人担忧的现象在民主社会发展。它发生在“当一个审议群体的成员在成员的预先审议倾向所指示的方向上向一个更极端的点移动时”(Sunstein, 1999: 3-4)。因此,在讨论之后,不同的观点出现了,人们倾向于在讨论之前就倾向于他们已经倾向的观点。例如,如果面对支持不同立场的人,相信疫苗与自闭症有关的人会更加坚定地坚持他们已有的观点;同样的情况也会发生在左倾选民或支持女权主义的积极分子之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polarization and the Role of Digital Media
Nordicum-Mediterraneum. Icelandic E-Journal of Nordicum and Mediterranean Studies (DOI code, author's name and issue details are available on the journal's website) Group polarization is a serious and worrying phenomenon developing in democratic societies. It occurs «when members of a deliberating group move toward a more extreme point in whatever direction is indicated by the members’ predeliberation tendency» (Sunstein, 1999: 3-4). As a result, after a discussion where different points of view emerge, people tend to align to the opinion they were already tending to, before the discussion itself. For example, if confronted with someone that supports a different position, people who believe that vaccines are linked to autism will adhere to their pre-existing perspectives with much more conviction; the same will occur between left-leaning voters or pro-feminist activists and so on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信