{"title":"怀疑亚伯拉罕怀疑神-亚伯拉罕在Or ha-Sekhel的呼召","authors":"Benjamin Williams","doi":"10.31826/mjj-2016-120106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Abraham ben Asher’s Or ha-Sekhel , an exposition of Genesis Rabba, was published in Venice in 1567. The author frequently interprets midrashim by listing and then harmonising series of “doubts” or “questions” ( sefekot or she ʾ elot ) that arise in the text. The present study analyses this mode of exegesis by examining Abraham ben Asher’s interpretation of the exposition of the Call of Abraham at Genesis Rabba 39:1. The midrash likens the biblical account (Genesis 12:1) to a wayfarer who, on seeing a burning building, asked whether anyone was in charge and was subsequently confronted by the owner. Thus Abraham asked whether anyone was in charge of the world and then received his divine mandate. Abraham ben Asher begins his interpretation with a startling observation: the midrash seems to imply that Abraham questioned the existence of God. In the harmonising interpretation that follows, Abraham ben Asher reassures the reader that the patriarch considered the nature of divine providence rather than God’s existence. Nevertheless, as this paper argues, he deliberately led his audience to entertain the notion that Abraham once lacked a proper understanding of monotheism. Thi s serves a rhetorical purpose, capturing the reader’s interest in how the expositor will solve the problem he raised. By assailing readers with questions and then providing solutions, Abraham ben Asher also creates the impression that any uncertainties that may arise in the study of midrash will inevitably have satisfactory resolutions because the sages’ words can always be expounded so as to reveal harmonious and coherent interpretations.","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Doubting Abraham doubting God – The Call of Abraham in the Or ha-Sekhel\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/mjj-2016-120106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Abraham ben Asher’s Or ha-Sekhel , an exposition of Genesis Rabba, was published in Venice in 1567. The author frequently interprets midrashim by listing and then harmonising series of “doubts” or “questions” ( sefekot or she ʾ elot ) that arise in the text. The present study analyses this mode of exegesis by examining Abraham ben Asher’s interpretation of the exposition of the Call of Abraham at Genesis Rabba 39:1. The midrash likens the biblical account (Genesis 12:1) to a wayfarer who, on seeing a burning building, asked whether anyone was in charge and was subsequently confronted by the owner. Thus Abraham asked whether anyone was in charge of the world and then received his divine mandate. Abraham ben Asher begins his interpretation with a startling observation: the midrash seems to imply that Abraham questioned the existence of God. In the harmonising interpretation that follows, Abraham ben Asher reassures the reader that the patriarch considered the nature of divine providence rather than God’s existence. Nevertheless, as this paper argues, he deliberately led his audience to entertain the notion that Abraham once lacked a proper understanding of monotheism. Thi s serves a rhetorical purpose, capturing the reader’s interest in how the expositor will solve the problem he raised. By assailing readers with questions and then providing solutions, Abraham ben Asher also creates the impression that any uncertainties that may arise in the study of midrash will inevitably have satisfactory resolutions because the sages’ words can always be expounded so as to reveal harmonious and coherent interpretations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2016-120106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2016-120106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
亚伯拉罕·本·亚设的《创世纪》(Or ha-Sekhel)于1567年在威尼斯出版。作者经常通过列出然后协调文本中出现的一系列“怀疑”或“问题”(sefekot或she ' l ā elot)来解释midrashim。本研究通过考察亚伯拉罕本亚设对创世纪拉巴记39:1中亚伯拉罕呼召的解释来分析这种注释模式。米德拉什将圣经中的记载(创世记12:1)比作一个旅行者,他看到一座燃烧的建筑物,问是否有人负责,随后被业主质问。因此,亚伯拉罕问是否有人掌管世界,然后接受了他的神圣使命。亚伯拉罕·本·亚设以一个惊人的观察开始他的解释:米德拉希似乎暗示亚伯拉罕质疑上帝的存在。在接下来的和谐解释中,亚伯拉罕·本·亚设向读者保证,族长考虑的是神圣天意的本质,而不是上帝的存在。然而,正如本文所述,他故意让他的听众接受亚伯拉罕曾经缺乏对一神教的正确理解的观念。这是为了达到修辞的目的,抓住读者对讲解者如何解决他提出的问题的兴趣。通过向读者提出问题,然后提供解决方案,亚伯拉罕·本·阿瑟也创造了一种印象,即在研究米德拉什时可能出现的任何不确定因素都不可避免地会有令人满意的解决方案,因为圣人的话总是可以被阐明,从而揭示出和谐而连贯的解释。
Doubting Abraham doubting God – The Call of Abraham in the Or ha-Sekhel
: Abraham ben Asher’s Or ha-Sekhel , an exposition of Genesis Rabba, was published in Venice in 1567. The author frequently interprets midrashim by listing and then harmonising series of “doubts” or “questions” ( sefekot or she ʾ elot ) that arise in the text. The present study analyses this mode of exegesis by examining Abraham ben Asher’s interpretation of the exposition of the Call of Abraham at Genesis Rabba 39:1. The midrash likens the biblical account (Genesis 12:1) to a wayfarer who, on seeing a burning building, asked whether anyone was in charge and was subsequently confronted by the owner. Thus Abraham asked whether anyone was in charge of the world and then received his divine mandate. Abraham ben Asher begins his interpretation with a startling observation: the midrash seems to imply that Abraham questioned the existence of God. In the harmonising interpretation that follows, Abraham ben Asher reassures the reader that the patriarch considered the nature of divine providence rather than God’s existence. Nevertheless, as this paper argues, he deliberately led his audience to entertain the notion that Abraham once lacked a proper understanding of monotheism. Thi s serves a rhetorical purpose, capturing the reader’s interest in how the expositor will solve the problem he raised. By assailing readers with questions and then providing solutions, Abraham ben Asher also creates the impression that any uncertainties that may arise in the study of midrash will inevitably have satisfactory resolutions because the sages’ words can always be expounded so as to reveal harmonious and coherent interpretations.