研究视觉视角在基于运动图像的脑-机器人互动中的影响:一项健康参与者的初步研究

Andrea Farabbi, P. Figueiredo, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, L. Mainardi, J. Sanches, Plinio Moreno, J. Santos-Victor, A. Vourvopoulos
{"title":"研究视觉视角在基于运动图像的脑-机器人互动中的影响:一项健康参与者的初步研究","authors":"Andrea Farabbi, P. Figueiredo, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, L. Mainardi, J. Sanches, Plinio Moreno, J. Santos-Victor, A. Vourvopoulos","doi":"10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1080794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Motor Imagery (MI)-based Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) have raised gained attention for their use in rehabilitation therapies since they allow controlling an external device by using brain activity, in this way promoting brain plasticity mechanisms that could lead to motor recovery. Specifically, rehabilitation robotics can provide precision and consistency for movement exercises, while embodied robotics could provide sensory feedback that can help patients improve their motor skills and coordination. However, it is still not clear whether different types of visual feedback may affect the elicited brain response and hence the effectiveness of MI-BCI for rehabilitation. Methods In this paper, we compare two visual feedback strategies based on controlling the movement of robotic arms through a MI-BCI system: 1) first-person perspective, with visual information that the user receives when they view the robot arms from their own perspective; and 2) third-person perspective, whereby the subjects observe the robot from an external perspective. We studied 10 healthy subjects over three consecutive sessions. The electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded and evaluated in terms of the power of the sensorimotor rhythms, as well as their lateralization, and spatial distribution. Results Our results show that both feedback perspectives can elicit motor-related brain responses, but without any significant differences between them. Moreover, the evoked responses remained consistent across all sessions, showing no significant differences between the first and the last session. Discussion Overall, these results suggest that the type of perspective may not influence the brain responses during a MI- BCI task based on a robotic feedback, although, due to the limited sample size, more evidence is required. Finally, this study resulted into the production of 180 labeled MI EEG datasets, publicly available for research purposes.","PeriodicalId":207447,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the impact of visual perspective in a motor imagery-based brain-robot interaction: A pilot study with healthy participants\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Farabbi, P. Figueiredo, Fabiola Ghiringhelli, L. Mainardi, J. Sanches, Plinio Moreno, J. Santos-Victor, A. Vourvopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1080794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Motor Imagery (MI)-based Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) have raised gained attention for their use in rehabilitation therapies since they allow controlling an external device by using brain activity, in this way promoting brain plasticity mechanisms that could lead to motor recovery. Specifically, rehabilitation robotics can provide precision and consistency for movement exercises, while embodied robotics could provide sensory feedback that can help patients improve their motor skills and coordination. However, it is still not clear whether different types of visual feedback may affect the elicited brain response and hence the effectiveness of MI-BCI for rehabilitation. Methods In this paper, we compare two visual feedback strategies based on controlling the movement of robotic arms through a MI-BCI system: 1) first-person perspective, with visual information that the user receives when they view the robot arms from their own perspective; and 2) third-person perspective, whereby the subjects observe the robot from an external perspective. We studied 10 healthy subjects over three consecutive sessions. The electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded and evaluated in terms of the power of the sensorimotor rhythms, as well as their lateralization, and spatial distribution. Results Our results show that both feedback perspectives can elicit motor-related brain responses, but without any significant differences between them. Moreover, the evoked responses remained consistent across all sessions, showing no significant differences between the first and the last session. Discussion Overall, these results suggest that the type of perspective may not influence the brain responses during a MI- BCI task based on a robotic feedback, although, due to the limited sample size, more evidence is required. Finally, this study resulted into the production of 180 labeled MI EEG datasets, publicly available for research purposes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1080794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1080794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于运动意象(MI)的脑机接口(BCI)在康复治疗中的应用引起了人们的关注,因为它们允许通过大脑活动来控制外部设备,从而促进可能导致运动恢复的大脑可塑性机制。具体来说,康复机器人可以为运动练习提供精确和一致性,而嵌入式机器人可以提供感官反馈,帮助患者提高运动技能和协调能力。然而,目前尚不清楚不同类型的视觉反馈是否会影响引发的大脑反应,从而影响MI-BCI对康复的有效性。方法通过MI-BCI系统,比较了两种基于控制机械臂运动的视觉反馈策略:1)第一人称视角,即用户从自己的视角观察机械臂时所接收到的视觉信息;2)第三人称视角,即受试者从外部角度观察机器人。我们对10名健康受试者进行了连续三个阶段的研究。记录脑电图(EEG)信号,并根据感觉运动节律的力量、其偏侧性和空间分布进行评估。结果两种反馈视角均能引起运动相关的脑反应,但两者之间无显著差异。此外,在所有的会话中,所引起的反应保持一致,在第一次和最后一次会话之间没有显着差异。总的来说,这些结果表明,在基于机器人反馈的MI- BCI任务中,视角类型可能不会影响大脑反应,尽管由于样本量有限,需要更多的证据。最后,这项研究产生了180个标记的MI脑电图数据集,可公开用于研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the impact of visual perspective in a motor imagery-based brain-robot interaction: A pilot study with healthy participants
Introduction Motor Imagery (MI)-based Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI) have raised gained attention for their use in rehabilitation therapies since they allow controlling an external device by using brain activity, in this way promoting brain plasticity mechanisms that could lead to motor recovery. Specifically, rehabilitation robotics can provide precision and consistency for movement exercises, while embodied robotics could provide sensory feedback that can help patients improve their motor skills and coordination. However, it is still not clear whether different types of visual feedback may affect the elicited brain response and hence the effectiveness of MI-BCI for rehabilitation. Methods In this paper, we compare two visual feedback strategies based on controlling the movement of robotic arms through a MI-BCI system: 1) first-person perspective, with visual information that the user receives when they view the robot arms from their own perspective; and 2) third-person perspective, whereby the subjects observe the robot from an external perspective. We studied 10 healthy subjects over three consecutive sessions. The electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded and evaluated in terms of the power of the sensorimotor rhythms, as well as their lateralization, and spatial distribution. Results Our results show that both feedback perspectives can elicit motor-related brain responses, but without any significant differences between them. Moreover, the evoked responses remained consistent across all sessions, showing no significant differences between the first and the last session. Discussion Overall, these results suggest that the type of perspective may not influence the brain responses during a MI- BCI task based on a robotic feedback, although, due to the limited sample size, more evidence is required. Finally, this study resulted into the production of 180 labeled MI EEG datasets, publicly available for research purposes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信