基于实验测试的多相流建模:全球研究设施综述及未来发展需求

G. Falcone, C. Teodoriu, K. Reinicke, O. Bello
{"title":"基于实验测试的多相流建模:全球研究设施综述及未来发展需求","authors":"G. Falcone, C. Teodoriu, K. Reinicke, O. Bello","doi":"10.2118/110116-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiphase flow models for the oil and gas industry are required to investigate and understand the co-current or counter-current flow of different fluid phases under a wide range of pressure and temperature conditions and in several different flow configurations. To compliment this theoretical effort, experimental measurements are required to verify multiphase flow models under controlled conditions and assess their range of applicability. This is why there exists a large number of multiphase flow loops around the world. However, there are numerous varieties of multiphase flow occurrences due to differences in pressure and temperature, fluid types, flow regimes, pipe geometry, inclination and diameter, and whether the flow is steady-state or transient. Consider the example of hydrocarbon producing fields in the North Sea. Typical parameters for an oil well in the northern basins are as follows: production rate of 800-1600 cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.102-0.130 meters, reservoir depth of 3000-3500 meters, oil density of 825-930 kilograms per cubic meters, gas-oil-ratio of 100 standard cubic meters per standard cubic meters and water cut up to 90%. For a gas well in the southern gas basin, the typical parameters become: initial production rate of 0.7 to over 2.8 million standard cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.114-0.140 meters, reservoir depth of 2500-3500 meters and initial liquidgas-ratio of less than 1 to over 30 standard cubic meters per million standard cubic meters. The operational pressure at the wellhead may reach up to 10 MPa and reservoir pressures can be as high as 30 MPa. Furthermore, not only do well performance values vary considerably across the world and, they also vary with time for the same field. Building a flow loop that reproduces real hydrocarbon wells, including the reservoir inertia and the complex heat transfer process taking place between the wellbore and the reservoir, is not feasible. Thus, downscaling of typical field parameters is necessary for the study of multiphase flows at laboratory conditions. This paper presents a critical review of multiphase flow loops around the world, highlighting the pros and cons of each facility with regard to reproducing and monitoring different multiphase flow situations. The authors suggest a way forward for new developments in this area.","PeriodicalId":335535,"journal":{"name":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphase-flow Modeling Based on Experimental Testing: an Overview of Research Facilities Worldwide and the Need for Future Developments\",\"authors\":\"G. Falcone, C. Teodoriu, K. Reinicke, O. Bello\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/110116-PA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiphase flow models for the oil and gas industry are required to investigate and understand the co-current or counter-current flow of different fluid phases under a wide range of pressure and temperature conditions and in several different flow configurations. To compliment this theoretical effort, experimental measurements are required to verify multiphase flow models under controlled conditions and assess their range of applicability. This is why there exists a large number of multiphase flow loops around the world. However, there are numerous varieties of multiphase flow occurrences due to differences in pressure and temperature, fluid types, flow regimes, pipe geometry, inclination and diameter, and whether the flow is steady-state or transient. Consider the example of hydrocarbon producing fields in the North Sea. Typical parameters for an oil well in the northern basins are as follows: production rate of 800-1600 cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.102-0.130 meters, reservoir depth of 3000-3500 meters, oil density of 825-930 kilograms per cubic meters, gas-oil-ratio of 100 standard cubic meters per standard cubic meters and water cut up to 90%. For a gas well in the southern gas basin, the typical parameters become: initial production rate of 0.7 to over 2.8 million standard cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.114-0.140 meters, reservoir depth of 2500-3500 meters and initial liquidgas-ratio of less than 1 to over 30 standard cubic meters per million standard cubic meters. The operational pressure at the wellhead may reach up to 10 MPa and reservoir pressures can be as high as 30 MPa. Furthermore, not only do well performance values vary considerably across the world and, they also vary with time for the same field. Building a flow loop that reproduces real hydrocarbon wells, including the reservoir inertia and the complex heat transfer process taking place between the wellbore and the reservoir, is not feasible. Thus, downscaling of typical field parameters is necessary for the study of multiphase flows at laboratory conditions. This paper presents a critical review of multiphase flow loops around the world, highlighting the pros and cons of each facility with regard to reproducing and monitoring different multiphase flow situations. The authors suggest a way forward for new developments in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/110116-PA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/110116-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

油气行业需要多相流模型来研究和理解不同流体在各种压力和温度条件下的共流或逆流流动,以及几种不同的流动配置。为了补充这一理论成果,需要实验测量来验证受控条件下的多相流模型并评估其适用范围。这就是世界上存在大量多相流环的原因。然而,由于压力和温度、流体类型、流动状态、管道几何形状、倾角和直径以及流动是稳态还是瞬态的差异,多相流的发生有很多变化。以北海的油气生产油田为例。北方盆地一口油井的典型参数为:日产量800 ~ 1600立方米,管径0.102 ~ 0.130米,储层深度3000 ~ 3500米,含油密度825 ~ 930公斤/立方米,气油比100标准立方米/标准立方米,含水90%。南部气井的典型参数为:初产率0.7 ~ 280万标准立方米/天以上,管径0.114 ~ 0.140米,储层深度2500 ~ 3500米,初液气比小于1 ~ 30标准立方米/百万标准立方米以上。井口作业压力可达10mpa,储层压力可高达30mpa。此外,井的性能值不仅在世界各地差异很大,而且在同一油田,它们也随时间而变化。建立一个重现真实油气井的流动回路是不可行的,包括储层惯性和井筒与储层之间发生的复杂传热过程。因此,在实验室条件下研究多相流时,有必要降低典型场参数的尺度。本文对世界各地的多相流回路进行了综述,重点介绍了每种设备在再现和监测不同多相流情况方面的优缺点。作者为这一领域的新发展提出了一条前进的道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiphase-flow Modeling Based on Experimental Testing: an Overview of Research Facilities Worldwide and the Need for Future Developments
Multiphase flow models for the oil and gas industry are required to investigate and understand the co-current or counter-current flow of different fluid phases under a wide range of pressure and temperature conditions and in several different flow configurations. To compliment this theoretical effort, experimental measurements are required to verify multiphase flow models under controlled conditions and assess their range of applicability. This is why there exists a large number of multiphase flow loops around the world. However, there are numerous varieties of multiphase flow occurrences due to differences in pressure and temperature, fluid types, flow regimes, pipe geometry, inclination and diameter, and whether the flow is steady-state or transient. Consider the example of hydrocarbon producing fields in the North Sea. Typical parameters for an oil well in the northern basins are as follows: production rate of 800-1600 cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.102-0.130 meters, reservoir depth of 3000-3500 meters, oil density of 825-930 kilograms per cubic meters, gas-oil-ratio of 100 standard cubic meters per standard cubic meters and water cut up to 90%. For a gas well in the southern gas basin, the typical parameters become: initial production rate of 0.7 to over 2.8 million standard cubic meters per day, tubing diameter of 0.114-0.140 meters, reservoir depth of 2500-3500 meters and initial liquidgas-ratio of less than 1 to over 30 standard cubic meters per million standard cubic meters. The operational pressure at the wellhead may reach up to 10 MPa and reservoir pressures can be as high as 30 MPa. Furthermore, not only do well performance values vary considerably across the world and, they also vary with time for the same field. Building a flow loop that reproduces real hydrocarbon wells, including the reservoir inertia and the complex heat transfer process taking place between the wellbore and the reservoir, is not feasible. Thus, downscaling of typical field parameters is necessary for the study of multiphase flows at laboratory conditions. This paper presents a critical review of multiphase flow loops around the world, highlighting the pros and cons of each facility with regard to reproducing and monitoring different multiphase flow situations. The authors suggest a way forward for new developments in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信