姓氏的经济学理论

Alastair Berg
{"title":"姓氏的经济学理论","authors":"Alastair Berg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3418074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Names are one of the simplest means of distinguishing between two individuals. They can be considered near universal, and provide a robust means for indirect interaction. Heritable surnames serve both commercial and state based interests. They are a means to enforce primogeniture, and have historically been associated with the inheritance of property. They also act as a tool of the state to enforce actions against particular ethnic or familial groups, while ensuring obligations and entitlements are limited to those eligible. Within the scholarly tradition of the new institutional economics of history, along with the property rights literature exemplified respectively by Demsetz (1964, 1967) as well as Riker and Sened (1991), this paper examines the proliferation of heritable surnames after the Norman invasion of 1066, to determine their commercial and administrative origins. In the English example, surnames were adopted rapidly by major landholders, seeking to bolster their ability to pass on property to heirs in the face of often arbitrary actions by the king. The process was substantially slower for lower classes, with the calculation and enforcement of taxation obligations playing a major role in their use by these groups.","PeriodicalId":176096,"journal":{"name":"Economic History eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Economic Theory of Surnames\",\"authors\":\"Alastair Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3418074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Names are one of the simplest means of distinguishing between two individuals. They can be considered near universal, and provide a robust means for indirect interaction. Heritable surnames serve both commercial and state based interests. They are a means to enforce primogeniture, and have historically been associated with the inheritance of property. They also act as a tool of the state to enforce actions against particular ethnic or familial groups, while ensuring obligations and entitlements are limited to those eligible. Within the scholarly tradition of the new institutional economics of history, along with the property rights literature exemplified respectively by Demsetz (1964, 1967) as well as Riker and Sened (1991), this paper examines the proliferation of heritable surnames after the Norman invasion of 1066, to determine their commercial and administrative origins. In the English example, surnames were adopted rapidly by major landholders, seeking to bolster their ability to pass on property to heirs in the face of often arbitrary actions by the king. The process was substantially slower for lower classes, with the calculation and enforcement of taxation obligations playing a major role in their use by these groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3418074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

名字是区分两个人最简单的方法之一。它们可以被认为是近乎普遍的,并为间接交互提供了一种强大的手段。可遗传的姓氏既符合商业利益,也符合国家利益。它们是执行长子继承制的一种手段,历史上一直与财产继承有关。它们还作为国家的工具,对特定种族或家庭群体实施行动,同时确保义务和权利仅限于符合条件的人。在历史新制度经济学的学术传统中,以及以Demsetz(1966,1967)以及Riker和Sened(1991)为代表的产权文献中,本文考察了1066年诺曼入侵后可继承姓氏的激增,以确定其商业和行政起源。以英国为例,姓氏被大地主迅速采用,以增强他们在面对国王专制行为时将财产传给继承人的能力。对于下层阶级来说,这个过程要慢得多,因为计算和执行纳税义务对这些群体的使用起着主要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Economic Theory of Surnames
Names are one of the simplest means of distinguishing between two individuals. They can be considered near universal, and provide a robust means for indirect interaction. Heritable surnames serve both commercial and state based interests. They are a means to enforce primogeniture, and have historically been associated with the inheritance of property. They also act as a tool of the state to enforce actions against particular ethnic or familial groups, while ensuring obligations and entitlements are limited to those eligible. Within the scholarly tradition of the new institutional economics of history, along with the property rights literature exemplified respectively by Demsetz (1964, 1967) as well as Riker and Sened (1991), this paper examines the proliferation of heritable surnames after the Norman invasion of 1066, to determine their commercial and administrative origins. In the English example, surnames were adopted rapidly by major landholders, seeking to bolster their ability to pass on property to heirs in the face of often arbitrary actions by the king. The process was substantially slower for lower classes, with the calculation and enforcement of taxation obligations playing a major role in their use by these groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信