协作痕迹对可信度的影响

E. Trainer, B. Al-Ani, D. Redmiles
{"title":"协作痕迹对可信度的影响","authors":"E. Trainer, B. Al-Ani, D. Redmiles","doi":"10.1145/1984642.1984649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated how trust among software developers would be affected by providing them with visualizations of collaborative traces. We define collaborative traces to be representations of the past and current activity of a group of developers manipulating software development artifacts. In this paper, we report two main findings. First, we report the results of our controlled experiment in which collaborative traces were visualized. Second, we present an overview of tools which aim to represent collaborative software engineering traces. Our experiment provides evidence that collaborative traces can support the development of several factors of trust identified in our field study. However, we also identified some shortcomings of our current visualizations, gaining insights into future improvements. From our review of tools that represent collaborative traces, we observed that such representations can drive the design of tools that aim to support trust. We also present a table of tools; the table can be used to guide discussion and the design of tools that promote trust in software development.","PeriodicalId":136711,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of collaborative traces on trustworthiness\",\"authors\":\"E. Trainer, B. Al-Ani, D. Redmiles\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1984642.1984649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated how trust among software developers would be affected by providing them with visualizations of collaborative traces. We define collaborative traces to be representations of the past and current activity of a group of developers manipulating software development artifacts. In this paper, we report two main findings. First, we report the results of our controlled experiment in which collaborative traces were visualized. Second, we present an overview of tools which aim to represent collaborative software engineering traces. Our experiment provides evidence that collaborative traces can support the development of several factors of trust identified in our field study. However, we also identified some shortcomings of our current visualizations, gaining insights into future improvements. From our review of tools that represent collaborative traces, we observed that such representations can drive the design of tools that aim to support trust. We also present a table of tools; the table can be used to guide discussion and the design of tools that promote trust in software development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1984642.1984649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1984642.1984649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

我们调查了软件开发人员之间的信任如何通过向他们提供协作轨迹的可视化而受到影响。我们将协作跟踪定义为一组操作软件开发工件的开发人员过去和当前活动的表示。在本文中,我们报告了两个主要发现。首先,我们报告了我们的控制实验的结果,其中协作轨迹是可视化的。其次,我们概述了旨在表示协作软件工程轨迹的工具。我们的实验提供了证据,证明协作痕迹可以支持我们在实地研究中确定的几个信任因素的发展。然而,我们也发现了当前可视化的一些缺点,从而获得了对未来改进的见解。从我们对代表协作痕迹的工具的回顾中,我们观察到这样的表示可以驱动旨在支持信任的工具的设计。我们还提供了一个工具表;这个表格可以用来指导讨论和设计促进软件开发信任的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of collaborative traces on trustworthiness
We investigated how trust among software developers would be affected by providing them with visualizations of collaborative traces. We define collaborative traces to be representations of the past and current activity of a group of developers manipulating software development artifacts. In this paper, we report two main findings. First, we report the results of our controlled experiment in which collaborative traces were visualized. Second, we present an overview of tools which aim to represent collaborative software engineering traces. Our experiment provides evidence that collaborative traces can support the development of several factors of trust identified in our field study. However, we also identified some shortcomings of our current visualizations, gaining insights into future improvements. From our review of tools that represent collaborative traces, we observed that such representations can drive the design of tools that aim to support trust. We also present a table of tools; the table can be used to guide discussion and the design of tools that promote trust in software development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信