部分多态型推断是不可确定的

H. Boehm
{"title":"部分多态型推断是不可确定的","authors":"H. Boehm","doi":"10.1109/SFCS.1985.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polymorphic type systems combine the reliability and efficiency of static type-checking with the flexibility of dynamic type checking. Unfortunately, such languages tend to be unwieldy unless they accommodate omission of much of the information necessary to perform type checking. The automatic inference of omitted type information has emerged as one of the fundamental new implementation problems of these languages. We show here that a natural formalization of the problem is undecidable. The proof is directly applicable to some practical situations, and provides a partial explanation of the difficulties encountered in other cases.","PeriodicalId":296739,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial polymorphic type inference is undecidable\",\"authors\":\"H. Boehm\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SFCS.1985.44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polymorphic type systems combine the reliability and efficiency of static type-checking with the flexibility of dynamic type checking. Unfortunately, such languages tend to be unwieldy unless they accommodate omission of much of the information necessary to perform type checking. The automatic inference of omitted type information has emerged as one of the fundamental new implementation problems of these languages. We show here that a natural formalization of the problem is undecidable. The proof is directly applicable to some practical situations, and provides a partial explanation of the difficulties encountered in other cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1985.44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1985.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

多态类型系统将静态类型检查的可靠性和效率与动态类型检查的灵活性结合起来。不幸的是,这种语言往往是笨拙的,除非它们能够适应省略执行类型检查所需的许多信息。省略类型信息的自动推理已经成为这些语言的基本实现问题之一。我们在这里表明,问题的自然形式化是不可确定的。该证明直接适用于某些实际情况,并对其他情况下遇到的困难提供了部分解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Partial polymorphic type inference is undecidable
Polymorphic type systems combine the reliability and efficiency of static type-checking with the flexibility of dynamic type checking. Unfortunately, such languages tend to be unwieldy unless they accommodate omission of much of the information necessary to perform type checking. The automatic inference of omitted type information has emerged as one of the fundamental new implementation problems of these languages. We show here that a natural formalization of the problem is undecidable. The proof is directly applicable to some practical situations, and provides a partial explanation of the difficulties encountered in other cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信