创造性的人和地方在住房中建立健康公平

S. Burris, Katie Moran-McCabe, Nadya Prood, K. Blankenship, Angus Corbett, A. Gutman, Bethany Saxon
{"title":"创造性的人和地方在住房中建立健康公平","authors":"S. Burris, Katie Moran-McCabe, Nadya Prood, K. Blankenship, Angus Corbett, A. Gutman, Bethany Saxon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3497953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This report is the fourth in a series of reports exploring the role of law in housing equity and innovative uses of law to improve health equity through housing. The reports are based on extensive literature scans and semi-structured interviews with people who are taking action in housing policy and practice. The full series includes: Report I: A Vision of Health Equity in Housing; Report II: Legal Levers for Health Equity in Housing: A Systems Approach; Report III: Health Equity in Housing: Evidence and Evidence Gaps; Report IV: Creative People and Places Building Health Equity in Housing; Report V: Governing Health Equity in Housing; and Report VI: Health Equity through Housing: A Blueprint for Systematic Legal Action. This report explores ten themes identified through interviews with the people on the ground — the lawyers, researchers, civil rights advocates, community development executives, and affordable housing professionals — who are taking action to build health equity in housing in the US. After cataloging the evidence on the impact of legal levers in our third report, we wanted to learn what practitioners in the field and leading researchers thought about the use of legal levers for health equity in housing: what works, what doesn’t, and what might be tried next? Some of the themes that emerged from our conversations are: the interconnectedness of housing with other domains like transportation, community development and education; the failure of housing laws to protect vulnerable populations and eliminate segregation; and the need for better enforcement of useful levers and more resources to promote health equity in housing.","PeriodicalId":306856,"journal":{"name":"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creative People and Places Building Health Equity in Housing\",\"authors\":\"S. Burris, Katie Moran-McCabe, Nadya Prood, K. Blankenship, Angus Corbett, A. Gutman, Bethany Saxon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3497953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This report is the fourth in a series of reports exploring the role of law in housing equity and innovative uses of law to improve health equity through housing. The reports are based on extensive literature scans and semi-structured interviews with people who are taking action in housing policy and practice. The full series includes: Report I: A Vision of Health Equity in Housing; Report II: Legal Levers for Health Equity in Housing: A Systems Approach; Report III: Health Equity in Housing: Evidence and Evidence Gaps; Report IV: Creative People and Places Building Health Equity in Housing; Report V: Governing Health Equity in Housing; and Report VI: Health Equity through Housing: A Blueprint for Systematic Legal Action. This report explores ten themes identified through interviews with the people on the ground — the lawyers, researchers, civil rights advocates, community development executives, and affordable housing professionals — who are taking action to build health equity in housing in the US. After cataloging the evidence on the impact of legal levers in our third report, we wanted to learn what practitioners in the field and leading researchers thought about the use of legal levers for health equity in housing: what works, what doesn’t, and what might be tried next? Some of the themes that emerged from our conversations are: the interconnectedness of housing with other domains like transportation, community development and education; the failure of housing laws to protect vulnerable populations and eliminate segregation; and the need for better enforcement of useful levers and more resources to promote health equity in housing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Inequality & the Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3497953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本报告是探讨法律在住房公平方面的作用和创新利用法律通过住房改善卫生公平的一系列报告中的第四份。这些报告是基于广泛的文献扫描和对正在住房政策和实践中采取行动的人的半结构化采访。完整的系列报告包括:报告一:住房卫生公平愿景;报告二:促进住房卫生公平的法律手段:系统办法;报告三:住房卫生公平:证据和证据差距;报告四:创造性的人和地方在住房中建立卫生公平;报告五:管理住房保健公平;报告六:通过住房实现卫生公平:系统法律行动蓝图。本报告通过对实地人士的采访,探讨了十个主题,这些人包括律师、研究人员、民权倡导者、社区发展高管和经济适用房专业人士,他们正在采取行动,在美国建立住房卫生公平。在我们的第三份报告中对法律杠杆影响的证据进行编目后,我们想了解该领域的从业者和主要研究人员对使用法律杠杆促进住房卫生公平的看法:哪些有效,哪些无效,下一步可以尝试哪些?从我们的对话中出现的一些主题是:住房与交通、社区发展和教育等其他领域的相互联系;住房法未能保护弱势群体和消除种族隔离;需要更好地执行有用的杠杆和更多的资源,以促进住房卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creative People and Places Building Health Equity in Housing
This report is the fourth in a series of reports exploring the role of law in housing equity and innovative uses of law to improve health equity through housing. The reports are based on extensive literature scans and semi-structured interviews with people who are taking action in housing policy and practice. The full series includes: Report I: A Vision of Health Equity in Housing; Report II: Legal Levers for Health Equity in Housing: A Systems Approach; Report III: Health Equity in Housing: Evidence and Evidence Gaps; Report IV: Creative People and Places Building Health Equity in Housing; Report V: Governing Health Equity in Housing; and Report VI: Health Equity through Housing: A Blueprint for Systematic Legal Action. This report explores ten themes identified through interviews with the people on the ground — the lawyers, researchers, civil rights advocates, community development executives, and affordable housing professionals — who are taking action to build health equity in housing in the US. After cataloging the evidence on the impact of legal levers in our third report, we wanted to learn what practitioners in the field and leading researchers thought about the use of legal levers for health equity in housing: what works, what doesn’t, and what might be tried next? Some of the themes that emerged from our conversations are: the interconnectedness of housing with other domains like transportation, community development and education; the failure of housing laws to protect vulnerable populations and eliminate segregation; and the need for better enforcement of useful levers and more resources to promote health equity in housing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信