赞扬陪审团审判:罗伯特·p·伯恩斯《美国审判之死》书评

Andrew E. Taslitz
{"title":"赞扬陪审团审判:罗伯特·p·伯恩斯《美国审判之死》书评","authors":"Andrew E. Taslitz","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay reviews Robert Burns’ The Death of the American Trial. That book defends the jury trial against its critics and bemoans its demise by cataloguing the social functions the trial serves. These functions include individualizing justice, preventing elite dominance of the courts, “de-thinging” persons, empowering the weak, and protecting free speech. This essay explores how the rise of computer technologies and modern changes in the media make the trial's social functions even more important than Burns suggests.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In Praise of the Jury Trial: A Review of Robert P. Burns' The Death of the American Trial\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E. Taslitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1554-4567.1116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay reviews Robert Burns’ The Death of the American Trial. That book defends the jury trial against its critics and bemoans its demise by cataloguing the social functions the trial serves. These functions include individualizing justice, preventing elite dominance of the courts, “de-thinging” persons, empowering the weak, and protecting free speech. This essay explores how the rise of computer technologies and modern changes in the media make the trial's social functions even more important than Burns suggests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Commentary on Evidence\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Commentary on Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Commentary on Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了罗伯特·伯恩斯的《美国审判之死》。这本书为陪审团审判辩护,反对批评者,并通过对审判服务的社会功能进行分类,哀叹它的消亡。这些功能包括使司法个人化、防止法院的精英统治、“去物化”个人、赋予弱者权力以及保护言论自由。这篇文章探讨了计算机技术的兴起和媒体的现代变化如何使审判的社会功能比伯恩斯所认为的更为重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In Praise of the Jury Trial: A Review of Robert P. Burns' The Death of the American Trial
This essay reviews Robert Burns’ The Death of the American Trial. That book defends the jury trial against its critics and bemoans its demise by cataloguing the social functions the trial serves. These functions include individualizing justice, preventing elite dominance of the courts, “de-thinging” persons, empowering the weak, and protecting free speech. This essay explores how the rise of computer technologies and modern changes in the media make the trial's social functions even more important than Burns suggests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信