评估生物医学界的数据管理和传输工具

R. Grutz, Benjamin Löhnhardt, M. Brodhun, F. Dickmann
{"title":"评估生物医学界的数据管理和传输工具","authors":"R. Grutz, Benjamin Löhnhardt, M. Brodhun, F. Dickmann","doi":"10.1109/DEST.2012.6227930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The biomedical community produces and uses a continuously growing amount of data while it lacks an inter-institutional research data management system. The LABIMI/F project founded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) implements an infrastructure to close this gap with an exemplary prototype for the use cases of medical image and genome research data. To determine suitable application(s) for this intention, several criteria for data management and data transfer, concerning their up-to-dateness, usability, metadata and payload management etc., are developed. These criteria are applied to three data management tools (DSpace, Fedora Commons and ISA-Tab tools), and four data transfer tools (PowerFolder, iRODS, CryptShare and Globus-Online), in an use-value analysis (UVA). The UVA reveals that no application meets all criteria; therefore other tools, e.g. eSciDoc, should be evaluated before making a final decision. Fedora Commons scores highly in the category metadata and payload management but has no sufficient user frontend. Therefore, further research is necessary in order to find an appropriate frontend for Fedora Commons. The data transfer tool with the highest total application score is PowerFolder, which provides easy synchronization of files and folders between the users and a central repository.","PeriodicalId":320291,"journal":{"name":"2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of data management and transfer tools for the biomedical community\",\"authors\":\"R. Grutz, Benjamin Löhnhardt, M. Brodhun, F. Dickmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/DEST.2012.6227930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The biomedical community produces and uses a continuously growing amount of data while it lacks an inter-institutional research data management system. The LABIMI/F project founded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) implements an infrastructure to close this gap with an exemplary prototype for the use cases of medical image and genome research data. To determine suitable application(s) for this intention, several criteria for data management and data transfer, concerning their up-to-dateness, usability, metadata and payload management etc., are developed. These criteria are applied to three data management tools (DSpace, Fedora Commons and ISA-Tab tools), and four data transfer tools (PowerFolder, iRODS, CryptShare and Globus-Online), in an use-value analysis (UVA). The UVA reveals that no application meets all criteria; therefore other tools, e.g. eSciDoc, should be evaluated before making a final decision. Fedora Commons scores highly in the category metadata and payload management but has no sufficient user frontend. Therefore, further research is necessary in order to find an appropriate frontend for Fedora Commons. The data transfer tool with the highest total application score is PowerFolder, which provides easy synchronization of files and folders between the users and a central repository.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2012.6227930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEST.2012.6227930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生物医学界产生和使用的数据量不断增加,但缺乏机构间的研究数据管理系统。由德国研究基金会(DFG)创立的LABIMI/F项目实施了一个基础设施,通过医学图像和基因组研究数据用例的示范原型来缩小这一差距。为了确定适合此目的的应用程序,开发了几个数据管理和数据传输标准,涉及它们的最新性、可用性、元数据和有效负载管理等。这些标准在使用价值分析(UVA)中应用于三个数据管理工具(DSpace、Fedora Commons和ISA-Tab工具)和四个数据传输工具(PowerFolder、iRODS、CryptShare和Globus-Online)。UVA显示,没有任何申请符合所有标准;因此,在做出最终决定之前,应该评估其他工具,例如eSciDoc。Fedora Commons在类别元数据和有效负载管理方面得分很高,但没有足够的用户前端。因此,为了为Fedora Commons找到合适的前端,有必要进行进一步的研究。应用程序总分最高的数据传输工具是PowerFolder,它提供了用户和中央存储库之间文件和文件夹的轻松同步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of data management and transfer tools for the biomedical community
The biomedical community produces and uses a continuously growing amount of data while it lacks an inter-institutional research data management system. The LABIMI/F project founded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) implements an infrastructure to close this gap with an exemplary prototype for the use cases of medical image and genome research data. To determine suitable application(s) for this intention, several criteria for data management and data transfer, concerning their up-to-dateness, usability, metadata and payload management etc., are developed. These criteria are applied to three data management tools (DSpace, Fedora Commons and ISA-Tab tools), and four data transfer tools (PowerFolder, iRODS, CryptShare and Globus-Online), in an use-value analysis (UVA). The UVA reveals that no application meets all criteria; therefore other tools, e.g. eSciDoc, should be evaluated before making a final decision. Fedora Commons scores highly in the category metadata and payload management but has no sufficient user frontend. Therefore, further research is necessary in order to find an appropriate frontend for Fedora Commons. The data transfer tool with the highest total application score is PowerFolder, which provides easy synchronization of files and folders between the users and a central repository.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信