基于机器学习方法的生物医学命名实体识别方法比较研究

Mohammed Rais, Abdelmonaime Lachkar, Abdelhamid Lachkar, S. A. Ouatik
{"title":"基于机器学习方法的生物医学命名实体识别方法比较研究","authors":"Mohammed Rais, Abdelmonaime Lachkar, Abdelhamid Lachkar, S. A. Ouatik","doi":"10.1109/CIST.2014.7016641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recognizing Biomedical Named Entities (BioNEs) such as genes, proteins, cells, drugs, diseases, etc. play a vital role in many Biomedical Text Mining applications. BioNER fall into five approaches: Dictionary-Based, Rule-Based, Machine-Learning-Based, Statistical-Based, and Hybrid-Based. Methods Based Machine Learning approach, are more effective than those of other approaches, and therefore have been widely used for learning to recognize BioNEs. In this paper, we present a comparative theoretical and experimental study between seven Machine Learning methods, by summarizing their advantages and weaknesses, and comparing their performance on two standard biomedical Corpora (GENIA and JNLPBA). The obtained results show that CRF outperforms all the other Machine-Learning methods on both corpora. That method (CRF) will be integrated in our future works.","PeriodicalId":106483,"journal":{"name":"2014 Third IEEE International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of biomedical named entity recognition methods based machine learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Rais, Abdelmonaime Lachkar, Abdelhamid Lachkar, S. A. Ouatik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIST.2014.7016641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recognizing Biomedical Named Entities (BioNEs) such as genes, proteins, cells, drugs, diseases, etc. play a vital role in many Biomedical Text Mining applications. BioNER fall into five approaches: Dictionary-Based, Rule-Based, Machine-Learning-Based, Statistical-Based, and Hybrid-Based. Methods Based Machine Learning approach, are more effective than those of other approaches, and therefore have been widely used for learning to recognize BioNEs. In this paper, we present a comparative theoretical and experimental study between seven Machine Learning methods, by summarizing their advantages and weaknesses, and comparing their performance on two standard biomedical Corpora (GENIA and JNLPBA). The obtained results show that CRF outperforms all the other Machine-Learning methods on both corpora. That method (CRF) will be integrated in our future works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Third IEEE International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Third IEEE International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2014.7016641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Third IEEE International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIST.2014.7016641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

识别生物医学命名实体(BioNEs),如基因、蛋白质、细胞、药物、疾病等,在许多生物医学文本挖掘应用中起着至关重要的作用。它们分为五种方法:基于字典的、基于规则的、基于机器学习的、基于统计的和基于混合的。基于机器学习的方法比其他方法更有效,因此被广泛用于生物识别的学习。本文对7种机器学习方法进行了理论和实验的比较研究,总结了它们的优缺点,并比较了它们在两个标准生物医学语料库(GENIA和JNLPBA)上的性能。得到的结果表明,CRF在这两个语料库上都优于所有其他机器学习方法。该方法(CRF)将集成到我们未来的工作中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of biomedical named entity recognition methods based machine learning approach
Recognizing Biomedical Named Entities (BioNEs) such as genes, proteins, cells, drugs, diseases, etc. play a vital role in many Biomedical Text Mining applications. BioNER fall into five approaches: Dictionary-Based, Rule-Based, Machine-Learning-Based, Statistical-Based, and Hybrid-Based. Methods Based Machine Learning approach, are more effective than those of other approaches, and therefore have been widely used for learning to recognize BioNEs. In this paper, we present a comparative theoretical and experimental study between seven Machine Learning methods, by summarizing their advantages and weaknesses, and comparing their performance on two standard biomedical Corpora (GENIA and JNLPBA). The obtained results show that CRF outperforms all the other Machine-Learning methods on both corpora. That method (CRF) will be integrated in our future works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信