{"title":"最佳风险转移,监控金融和实际投资活动","authors":"Gabriella Chiesa","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.903086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the implications of (optimal) credit risk transfer (CRT) for bank-loan monitoring and financial intermediation. Loans are subject to idiosyncratic risks and to common risk factor. We find that: i) (optimal) CRT enhances loan monitoring and expands financial intermediation, by contrast to previous literature; ii) optimal CRT's reference asset is loan portfolio; in line with the large development of portfolio products. The intuition is that an optimal contract for the bank to raise finance makes use of the information conveyed by loan-portfolio outcome and rewards the bank as much as possible for the outcomes that signal monitoring: Conditional on monitoring, bank is insulated from exogenous risk (common factor): The amount of capital per lending unit it needs to inject to find it incentive-compatible to monitor attains the minimum; incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum level. Deposit/debt financing is sub-optimal. It under-rewards monitoring: bank faces a tighter constraint on outside finance; incentive-based lending capacity is smaller. Optimal CRT amends to that: It makes use of the information conveyed by loan portfolio outcome so as to insulate monitoring bank from exogenous risk. Monitoring incentives are enhanced: incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum. Loan competition is made fiercer: spreads fall, aggregate monitored finance and real investment activity expand. Bank excess return on capital and CRT activity are positively correlated.","PeriodicalId":241091,"journal":{"name":"EFA Submission Session (check box to submit to EFA 2006 Zurich Meeting)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Risk Transfer, Monitored Finance and Real Investment Activity\",\"authors\":\"Gabriella Chiesa\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.903086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the implications of (optimal) credit risk transfer (CRT) for bank-loan monitoring and financial intermediation. Loans are subject to idiosyncratic risks and to common risk factor. We find that: i) (optimal) CRT enhances loan monitoring and expands financial intermediation, by contrast to previous literature; ii) optimal CRT's reference asset is loan portfolio; in line with the large development of portfolio products. The intuition is that an optimal contract for the bank to raise finance makes use of the information conveyed by loan-portfolio outcome and rewards the bank as much as possible for the outcomes that signal monitoring: Conditional on monitoring, bank is insulated from exogenous risk (common factor): The amount of capital per lending unit it needs to inject to find it incentive-compatible to monitor attains the minimum; incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum level. Deposit/debt financing is sub-optimal. It under-rewards monitoring: bank faces a tighter constraint on outside finance; incentive-based lending capacity is smaller. Optimal CRT amends to that: It makes use of the information conveyed by loan portfolio outcome so as to insulate monitoring bank from exogenous risk. Monitoring incentives are enhanced: incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum. Loan competition is made fiercer: spreads fall, aggregate monitored finance and real investment activity expand. Bank excess return on capital and CRT activity are positively correlated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":241091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFA Submission Session (check box to submit to EFA 2006 Zurich Meeting)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFA Submission Session (check box to submit to EFA 2006 Zurich Meeting)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.903086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA Submission Session (check box to submit to EFA 2006 Zurich Meeting)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.903086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Risk Transfer, Monitored Finance and Real Investment Activity
We examine the implications of (optimal) credit risk transfer (CRT) for bank-loan monitoring and financial intermediation. Loans are subject to idiosyncratic risks and to common risk factor. We find that: i) (optimal) CRT enhances loan monitoring and expands financial intermediation, by contrast to previous literature; ii) optimal CRT's reference asset is loan portfolio; in line with the large development of portfolio products. The intuition is that an optimal contract for the bank to raise finance makes use of the information conveyed by loan-portfolio outcome and rewards the bank as much as possible for the outcomes that signal monitoring: Conditional on monitoring, bank is insulated from exogenous risk (common factor): The amount of capital per lending unit it needs to inject to find it incentive-compatible to monitor attains the minimum; incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum level. Deposit/debt financing is sub-optimal. It under-rewards monitoring: bank faces a tighter constraint on outside finance; incentive-based lending capacity is smaller. Optimal CRT amends to that: It makes use of the information conveyed by loan portfolio outcome so as to insulate monitoring bank from exogenous risk. Monitoring incentives are enhanced: incentive-based lending capacity attains the maximum. Loan competition is made fiercer: spreads fall, aggregate monitored finance and real investment activity expand. Bank excess return on capital and CRT activity are positively correlated.