{"title":"ADAS/AD模拟测试综述","authors":"Yavuz Köroglu, F. Wotawa","doi":"10.1109/AST58925.2023.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vehicle and traffic simulation is a common practice for testing and evaluating advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving (AD). As a result, the literature mentions numerous simulators capable of simulating ADAS/AD implementations. In this study, we investigate previous surveys that cover multiple scenarios and initiate a systematic review targeting simulators for testing ADAS/AD. Our results show that the literature mentions, in total, 181 simulators capable of evaluating one or more ADAS/AD implementations. Furthermore, according to previous surveys and reviews, the most popular simulators are CARLA, Airsim, and SUMO. Finally, our results uncover that every five years, the number of novel simulators added to the literature grows at least quadratically, showing that further review is necessary to address the differences between these simulators and understand the simulator landscape from an ADAS/AD testing perspective.","PeriodicalId":252417,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Review on Simulated ADAS/AD Testing\",\"authors\":\"Yavuz Köroglu, F. Wotawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AST58925.2023.00015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Vehicle and traffic simulation is a common practice for testing and evaluating advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving (AD). As a result, the literature mentions numerous simulators capable of simulating ADAS/AD implementations. In this study, we investigate previous surveys that cover multiple scenarios and initiate a systematic review targeting simulators for testing ADAS/AD. Our results show that the literature mentions, in total, 181 simulators capable of evaluating one or more ADAS/AD implementations. Furthermore, according to previous surveys and reviews, the most popular simulators are CARLA, Airsim, and SUMO. Finally, our results uncover that every five years, the number of novel simulators added to the literature grows at least quadratically, showing that further review is necessary to address the differences between these simulators and understand the simulator landscape from an ADAS/AD testing perspective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST58925.2023.00015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test (AST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AST58925.2023.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vehicle and traffic simulation is a common practice for testing and evaluating advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) and autonomous driving (AD). As a result, the literature mentions numerous simulators capable of simulating ADAS/AD implementations. In this study, we investigate previous surveys that cover multiple scenarios and initiate a systematic review targeting simulators for testing ADAS/AD. Our results show that the literature mentions, in total, 181 simulators capable of evaluating one or more ADAS/AD implementations. Furthermore, according to previous surveys and reviews, the most popular simulators are CARLA, Airsim, and SUMO. Finally, our results uncover that every five years, the number of novel simulators added to the literature grows at least quadratically, showing that further review is necessary to address the differences between these simulators and understand the simulator landscape from an ADAS/AD testing perspective.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
