基于阈值的协同访问控制(T-CAC)

F. A. Alsulaiman, A. Miège, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
{"title":"基于阈值的协同访问控制(T-CAC)","authors":"F. A. Alsulaiman, A. Miège, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik","doi":"10.1109/CTS.2007.4621737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Userpsilas information confidentiality and privacy rise with the increased usage of computers by various organizations. Abuse of privileges might occur when the trust is based on a single person. Moreover, access control models usually consider only regular policies and are not appropriate to unusual or exceptional circumstances. For instance, in case of emergencies many users might override the access control system in order to access unauthorized sensitive data which is undesirable.","PeriodicalId":363805,"journal":{"name":"2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Threshold-based Collaborative Access Control (T-CAC)\",\"authors\":\"F. A. Alsulaiman, A. Miège, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CTS.2007.4621737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Userpsilas information confidentiality and privacy rise with the increased usage of computers by various organizations. Abuse of privileges might occur when the trust is based on a single person. Moreover, access control models usually consider only regular policies and are not appropriate to unusual or exceptional circumstances. For instance, in case of emergencies many users might override the access control system in order to access unauthorized sensitive data which is undesirable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2007.4621737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTS.2007.4621737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

随着各种组织越来越多地使用计算机,用户的信息保密性和隐私性也在提高。当信任建立在一个人的基础上时,可能会发生滥用特权的情况。此外,访问控制模型通常只考虑常规策略,不适用于异常或异常情况。例如,在紧急情况下,许多用户可能会超越访问控制系统,以访问未经授权的敏感数据,这是不受欢迎的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Threshold-based Collaborative Access Control (T-CAC)
Userpsilas information confidentiality and privacy rise with the increased usage of computers by various organizations. Abuse of privileges might occur when the trust is based on a single person. Moreover, access control models usually consider only regular policies and are not appropriate to unusual or exceptional circumstances. For instance, in case of emergencies many users might override the access control system in order to access unauthorized sensitive data which is undesirable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信