旧金山淘金热中的女性个体商人:在长期沉默的观点中寻找相关性

Meredith Eliassen
{"title":"旧金山淘金热中的女性个体商人:在长期沉默的观点中寻找相关性","authors":"Meredith Eliassen","doi":"10.1179/JRL.2008.4.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jonathan Swift reflected, 'laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.' Married women operating boardinghouses in San Francisco during the Gold Rush became caught in legal wrangles over land and were called to court. Cases that reached the California Supreme Court involving married women related to their fundamental ability of to contract to develop land and improve buildings. These cases set precedents throughout the state because San Francisco's problematic approaches to land allocation. Women who operated boardinghouses between 1849 and 1855 were plunged into an unregulated local climate of fierce real estate speculation. The balance of justice during the 1850s favored white American males who shaped laws to foster speculation while women quietly developed enterprises in the private sector to help make ends meet.1 Whether women operated family boardinghouses in their homes; commercial boardinghouses and small hotels; or conducted other type of businesses laws written during California's formative years shaped their experiences.","PeriodicalId":299529,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women as Sole Traders in Gold Rush San Francisco: Finding Relevance in Long-Silenced Points of View\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Eliassen\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/JRL.2008.4.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Jonathan Swift reflected, 'laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.' Married women operating boardinghouses in San Francisco during the Gold Rush became caught in legal wrangles over land and were called to court. Cases that reached the California Supreme Court involving married women related to their fundamental ability of to contract to develop land and improve buildings. These cases set precedents throughout the state because San Francisco's problematic approaches to land allocation. Women who operated boardinghouses between 1849 and 1855 were plunged into an unregulated local climate of fierce real estate speculation. The balance of justice during the 1850s favored white American males who shaped laws to foster speculation while women quietly developed enterprises in the private sector to help make ends meet.1 Whether women operated family boardinghouses in their homes; commercial boardinghouses and small hotels; or conducted other type of businesses laws written during California's formative years shaped their experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/JRL.2008.4.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Regional and Local Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/JRL.2008.4.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

乔纳森·斯威夫特反思道:“法律就像蜘蛛网,可以捕捉小苍蝇,却让黄蜂和大黄蜂突破。”在淘金热时期,在旧金山经营寄宿公寓的已婚妇女因土地问题陷入法律纠纷,并被告上法庭。加州最高法院受理的涉及已婚妇女的案件涉及她们签订合同开发土地和改善建筑物的基本能力。由于旧金山在土地分配方面存在问题,这些案件在全州树立了先例。在1849年至1855年间,经营寄宿公寓的女性陷入了当地不受监管的激烈房地产投机氛围中。19世纪50年代的司法平衡倾向于白人男性,他们制定法律促进投机,而女性则悄悄地在私营部门发展企业,以帮助维持收支平衡妇女是否在家中经营家庭寄宿公寓;商业寄宿公寓和小型旅馆;或者在加州形成时期制定的其他类型的商业法律塑造了他们的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women as Sole Traders in Gold Rush San Francisco: Finding Relevance in Long-Silenced Points of View
Jonathan Swift reflected, 'laws are like cobwebs, which may catch small flies, but let wasps and hornets break through.' Married women operating boardinghouses in San Francisco during the Gold Rush became caught in legal wrangles over land and were called to court. Cases that reached the California Supreme Court involving married women related to their fundamental ability of to contract to develop land and improve buildings. These cases set precedents throughout the state because San Francisco's problematic approaches to land allocation. Women who operated boardinghouses between 1849 and 1855 were plunged into an unregulated local climate of fierce real estate speculation. The balance of justice during the 1850s favored white American males who shaped laws to foster speculation while women quietly developed enterprises in the private sector to help make ends meet.1 Whether women operated family boardinghouses in their homes; commercial boardinghouses and small hotels; or conducted other type of businesses laws written during California's formative years shaped their experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信