银行冲击对实物投资和研发投资的影响更大吗?

Hirokazu Mizobata
{"title":"银行冲击对实物投资和研发投资的影响更大吗?","authors":"Hirokazu Mizobata","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3911062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on physical and R&D investments to examine the effect of bank shocks on corporate investment behavior at the firm level or economywide. I use matched bank-firm lending data of 1990 to 2014 belonging to Japanese enterprises to identify bank loan supply shocks from firms' borrowing shocks. During this period, bank concentration accelerated in Japan, which enhanced the granularity of bank shocks. The estimation result of the Q type investment function reveals that, when a firm relies heavily on loans, bank shocks become highly relevant for its physical investment compared with R&D investment. Specifically, a negative bank shock of one standard deviation introduces a 6% decline in the physical investment rate, while it brings about less than a 1% decline in the R&D investment rate, when the firm has its loan-to-asset ratio at the 75th percentile of the distribution. Consistent with this finding, the aggregate level analysis shows that granular bank shocks account for 8% of the variation in Japan's aggregate physical investment and have no explanatory power on Japan's aggregate R&D investment.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Bank Shocks Affect Physical or R&D Investments More?\",\"authors\":\"Hirokazu Mizobata\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3911062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on physical and R&D investments to examine the effect of bank shocks on corporate investment behavior at the firm level or economywide. I use matched bank-firm lending data of 1990 to 2014 belonging to Japanese enterprises to identify bank loan supply shocks from firms' borrowing shocks. During this period, bank concentration accelerated in Japan, which enhanced the granularity of bank shocks. The estimation result of the Q type investment function reveals that, when a firm relies heavily on loans, bank shocks become highly relevant for its physical investment compared with R&D investment. Specifically, a negative bank shock of one standard deviation introduces a 6% decline in the physical investment rate, while it brings about less than a 1% decline in the R&D investment rate, when the firm has its loan-to-asset ratio at the 75th percentile of the distribution. Consistent with this finding, the aggregate level analysis shows that granular bank shocks account for 8% of the variation in Japan's aggregate physical investment and have no explanatory power on Japan's aggregate R&D investment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3911062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以实物投资和研发投资为研究对象,在企业层面或经济层面考察银行冲击对企业投资行为的影响。我使用匹配的1990 - 2014年日本企业银行-企业贷款数据,从企业借贷冲击中识别银行贷款供给冲击。在此期间,日本的银行集中度加快,这增强了银行冲击的粒度。Q型投资函数的估计结果表明,当企业严重依赖贷款时,与研发投资相比,银行冲击对其实物投资的相关性更高。具体来说,一个标准差的负银行冲击会导致实物投资率下降6%,而当公司的贷款与资产比率处于分布的第75个百分位数时,它会导致研发投资率下降不到1%。与这一发现一致的是,总体水平分析表明,颗粒银行冲击占日本总实物投资变化的8%,对日本总研发投资没有解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Bank Shocks Affect Physical or R&D Investments More?
This study focuses on physical and R&D investments to examine the effect of bank shocks on corporate investment behavior at the firm level or economywide. I use matched bank-firm lending data of 1990 to 2014 belonging to Japanese enterprises to identify bank loan supply shocks from firms' borrowing shocks. During this period, bank concentration accelerated in Japan, which enhanced the granularity of bank shocks. The estimation result of the Q type investment function reveals that, when a firm relies heavily on loans, bank shocks become highly relevant for its physical investment compared with R&D investment. Specifically, a negative bank shock of one standard deviation introduces a 6% decline in the physical investment rate, while it brings about less than a 1% decline in the R&D investment rate, when the firm has its loan-to-asset ratio at the 75th percentile of the distribution. Consistent with this finding, the aggregate level analysis shows that granular bank shocks account for 8% of the variation in Japan's aggregate physical investment and have no explanatory power on Japan's aggregate R&D investment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信