欧洲调查令结果的评价

Željko Karas, Silvija Pejaković Đipić
{"title":"欧洲调查令结果的评价","authors":"Željko Karas, Silvija Pejaković Đipić","doi":"10.25234/ECLIC/9014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Authors are researching development and analyzing first effects of cross-border investigative measures, following enactment of the European Investigation Order (EIO). The EIO extends number of investigative actions which can be requested from other countries, and simplifies the process of evidence transfer. The paper is discussing problems during development of the EIO, its’ reception in Croatian system and a case study of the first orders received in Croatian police in 2018 is performed. This instrument is not imposing common legislative standards, but introducing the principle of mutual recognition which is derived from other law fields. The main risk is that diversity of some investigative measures could lead to the inadmissibility of evidence in subsequent criminal procedure. Results are showing that there hadn’t been obstacles in police practice so far. Main issues on principle of mutual recognition, double criminality or admissibility of evidence were not manifested in case study, but research indicates areas of potential problems.","PeriodicalId":246552,"journal":{"name":"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES","volume":"241 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTIGATION ORDER\",\"authors\":\"Željko Karas, Silvija Pejaković Đipić\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/ECLIC/9014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Authors are researching development and analyzing first effects of cross-border investigative measures, following enactment of the European Investigation Order (EIO). The EIO extends number of investigative actions which can be requested from other countries, and simplifies the process of evidence transfer. The paper is discussing problems during development of the EIO, its’ reception in Croatian system and a case study of the first orders received in Croatian police in 2018 is performed. This instrument is not imposing common legislative standards, but introducing the principle of mutual recognition which is derived from other law fields. The main risk is that diversity of some investigative measures could lead to the inadmissibility of evidence in subsequent criminal procedure. Results are showing that there hadn’t been obstacles in police practice so far. Main issues on principle of mutual recognition, double criminality or admissibility of evidence were not manifested in case study, but research indicates areas of potential problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES\",\"volume\":\"241 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/ECLIC/9014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EU AND MEMBER STATES – LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/ECLIC/9014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作者正在研究发展和分析跨境调查措施的第一效应,在欧洲调查令(EIO)颁布后。EIO扩大了可以要求其他国家采取的调查行动的数量,并简化了证据转移的过程。本文正在讨论EIO开发过程中的问题,其在克罗地亚系统中的接收情况,并对2018年克罗地亚警方收到的第一批订单进行了案例研究。这一文书并不是强加共同的立法标准,而是引入了源于其他法律领域的相互承认原则。主要的风险是,一些调查措施的多样性可能导致在随后的刑事诉讼中证据不可采信。结果表明,到目前为止,警察实践中没有遇到障碍。在案例分析中,虽然没有表现出相互承认原则、双重犯罪、证据可采性等主要问题,但研究指出了可能存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EVALUATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTIGATION ORDER
Authors are researching development and analyzing first effects of cross-border investigative measures, following enactment of the European Investigation Order (EIO). The EIO extends number of investigative actions which can be requested from other countries, and simplifies the process of evidence transfer. The paper is discussing problems during development of the EIO, its’ reception in Croatian system and a case study of the first orders received in Croatian police in 2018 is performed. This instrument is not imposing common legislative standards, but introducing the principle of mutual recognition which is derived from other law fields. The main risk is that diversity of some investigative measures could lead to the inadmissibility of evidence in subsequent criminal procedure. Results are showing that there hadn’t been obstacles in police practice so far. Main issues on principle of mutual recognition, double criminality or admissibility of evidence were not manifested in case study, but research indicates areas of potential problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信