现代Baumans有什么现代»«»«?

Wolfgang Knöbl
{"title":"现代Baumans有什么现代»«»«?","authors":"Wolfgang Knöbl","doi":"10.5771/9783748911852-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article tries to problematize Zygmunt Bauman’s understanding of »modernity« since it rests on a social science discourse which is in need of being historicized. As will be shown, the (sociological) concept of »modernity« is a rather new one that was created and then widely used not before the 1970s, a concept which was hardly ever a purely analyti-cal one, but one with enormous political implications. If this is so, then the question should be asked whether Bauman’s oftentimes brilliant sociological insights could be used even more fruitfully if one would re-frain from using this concept.","PeriodicalId":440821,"journal":{"name":"Fehlfarben der Postmoderne","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was ist »modern« an Baumans »Moderne«?\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Knöbl\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748911852-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article tries to problematize Zygmunt Bauman’s understanding of »modernity« since it rests on a social science discourse which is in need of being historicized. As will be shown, the (sociological) concept of »modernity« is a rather new one that was created and then widely used not before the 1970s, a concept which was hardly ever a purely analyti-cal one, but one with enormous political implications. If this is so, then the question should be asked whether Bauman’s oftentimes brilliant sociological insights could be used even more fruitfully if one would re-frain from using this concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fehlfarben der Postmoderne\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fehlfarben der Postmoderne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748911852-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fehlfarben der Postmoderne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748911852-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文试图质疑齐格蒙特·鲍曼对“现代性”的理解,因为它建立在一种需要被历史化的社会科学话语之上。正如将要展示的那样,“现代性”的(社会学)概念是一个相当新的概念,在20世纪70年代之前被创造出来并被广泛使用,这个概念几乎从来都不是一个纯粹的分析概念,而是一个具有巨大政治含义的概念。如果是这样的话,那么我们就应该问,如果人们不再使用这一概念,鲍曼的常常是杰出的社会学见解是否可以得到更富有成效的运用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Was ist »modern« an Baumans »Moderne«?
The article tries to problematize Zygmunt Bauman’s understanding of »modernity« since it rests on a social science discourse which is in need of being historicized. As will be shown, the (sociological) concept of »modernity« is a rather new one that was created and then widely used not before the 1970s, a concept which was hardly ever a purely analyti-cal one, but one with enormous political implications. If this is so, then the question should be asked whether Bauman’s oftentimes brilliant sociological insights could be used even more fruitfully if one would re-frain from using this concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信