Beyzanur Ergenekon
{"title":"Leone Caetani'nin Annali Dell’Islām Adlı Eserinde Kur’an-ı Kerim’in Mushaf Hâline Getirilmesi Hakkındaki Görüşleri","authors":"Beyzanur Ergenekon","doi":"10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research and studies within the scope of Orientalism that emerged in Western countries became systematic towards the end of the 17th century. Subsequently, the number of publications by orientalists on Islam has been increasing since the beginning of the 19th century. The Eastern studies that started in countries such as the Netherlands, France, and England also attracted the attention of Italian scientists. Leone Caetani is one of the representatives of Italian Orientalism. Caetani, who was positivist, materialist, Machiavellian, and Darwinian, wrote a comprehensive work called \"Annali Dell'Islām\" in which he portrayed the life of Prophet Muhammad according to his thoughts. This work was translated into Turkish as \"İslam Tarihi\" (History of Islam) by Hüseyin Câhid Yalçın in 1924. While this extensive work written with biased thinking was followed with great admiration in Italy, it also caused a great stir among the academic circles of the Republic of Turkey. Caetani used the primary sources of Islamic history in his Annali Dell'Islām. However, it has been understood that Caetani made incorrect assessments about the information in the primary sources when examining the life of Prophet Muhammad.  The main reasons for the criticism directed towards Caetani's work are his use of untrue statements and falling into contradictions regarding values that Muslims consider sacred without any doubt. Our study aims to examine Caetani's work regarding the developments that occurred during the compilation process of the Quran, which is the most reliable religious source of Muslims. It has been seen as a result of the research that Caetani exhibited a disrespectful attitude towards Islam, Prophet Muhammad, his Sunnah, and his companions, and that the claims about these subjects do not correspond to the truth according to the primary sources of Islamic history.","PeriodicalId":286866,"journal":{"name":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsbildirilerdergisi.419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

西方国家兴起的东方学范围内的研究在17世纪末趋于系统化。随后,自19世纪初以来,东方学家关于伊斯兰教的出版物数量不断增加。在荷兰、法国、英国等国家开始的东方研究也引起了意大利科学家的注意。莱昂内·卡塔尼是意大利东方主义的代表人物之一。卡塔尼是实证主义者、唯物主义者、马基雅维利主义者和达尔文主义者,他写了一部名为《安纳利·戴尔'Islām》的综合作品,在这部作品中,他根据自己的思想描绘了先知穆罕默德的生活。1924年,这部作品被翻译成土耳其语,由h seyin c (Yalçın)翻译为“İslam Tarihi”(伊斯兰教的历史)。虽然这部带有偏见的长篇著作在意大利受到了极大的赞赏,但它也在土耳其共和国的学术界引起了巨大的轰动。Caetani在他的Annali Dell'Islām中使用了伊斯兰历史的主要来源。然而,据了解,Caetani在研究先知穆罕默德的生平时,对原始资料中的信息做出了不正确的评估。针对Caetani作品的批评的主要原因是他使用了不真实的陈述,并且在穆斯林毫无疑问认为是神圣的价值观方面陷入矛盾。我们的研究旨在考察Caetani关于古兰经编纂过程中发生的发展的工作,古兰经是穆斯林最可靠的宗教来源。研究结果显示,卡塔尼对伊斯兰教、先知穆罕默德、他的圣训和他的同伴表现出一种不尊重的态度,而且根据伊斯兰历史的主要资料,关于这些主题的说法与事实不符。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leone Caetani'nin Annali Dell’Islām Adlı Eserinde Kur’an-ı Kerim’in Mushaf Hâline Getirilmesi Hakkındaki Görüşleri
The research and studies within the scope of Orientalism that emerged in Western countries became systematic towards the end of the 17th century. Subsequently, the number of publications by orientalists on Islam has been increasing since the beginning of the 19th century. The Eastern studies that started in countries such as the Netherlands, France, and England also attracted the attention of Italian scientists. Leone Caetani is one of the representatives of Italian Orientalism. Caetani, who was positivist, materialist, Machiavellian, and Darwinian, wrote a comprehensive work called "Annali Dell'Islām" in which he portrayed the life of Prophet Muhammad according to his thoughts. This work was translated into Turkish as "İslam Tarihi" (History of Islam) by Hüseyin Câhid Yalçın in 1924. While this extensive work written with biased thinking was followed with great admiration in Italy, it also caused a great stir among the academic circles of the Republic of Turkey. Caetani used the primary sources of Islamic history in his Annali Dell'Islām. However, it has been understood that Caetani made incorrect assessments about the information in the primary sources when examining the life of Prophet Muhammad.  The main reasons for the criticism directed towards Caetani's work are his use of untrue statements and falling into contradictions regarding values that Muslims consider sacred without any doubt. Our study aims to examine Caetani's work regarding the developments that occurred during the compilation process of the Quran, which is the most reliable religious source of Muslims. It has been seen as a result of the research that Caetani exhibited a disrespectful attitude towards Islam, Prophet Muhammad, his Sunnah, and his companions, and that the claims about these subjects do not correspond to the truth according to the primary sources of Islamic history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信