改革公共职能的规范框架:罗马尼亚和法国立法的比较观点

C. Pătraşcu
{"title":"改革公共职能的规范框架:罗马尼亚和法国立法的比较观点","authors":"C. Pătraşcu","doi":"10.18662/jls/17.1-2/97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article offers a brief analysis of the main juridical elements that shape the necessary framework for the organisation and coordination of public function in two administrative systems, namely Romania and France, as well as the most recent normative changes, objectives and accomplishments of public function reform in the two states. Explored mainly through qualitative methods (evaluation of specialized legislation and literature and the comparative approach), the complex topic of public function, and its newest evolutions in the countries under study, offers an interesting and rich field of research. \nSimilarities and differences between the two reform processes and approaches have been highlighted, together with the results attained.","PeriodicalId":106812,"journal":{"name":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reforming the Normative Frarmework of Public Function: Comparative View of Romanian and French Legislation\",\"authors\":\"C. Pătraşcu\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/jls/17.1-2/97\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article offers a brief analysis of the main juridical elements that shape the necessary framework for the organisation and coordination of public function in two administrative systems, namely Romania and France, as well as the most recent normative changes, objectives and accomplishments of public function reform in the two states. Explored mainly through qualitative methods (evaluation of specialized legislation and literature and the comparative approach), the complex topic of public function, and its newest evolutions in the countries under study, offers an interesting and rich field of research. \\nSimilarities and differences between the two reform processes and approaches have been highlighted, together with the results attained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":106812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.1-2/97\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/jls/17.1-2/97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文简要分析了罗马尼亚和法国这两个行政系统中公共职能组织和协调的必要框架的主要法律要素,以及这两个国家公共职能改革的最新规范变化、目标和成就。主要通过定性方法(对专门立法和文献的评价以及比较方法)进行探索,公共职能这一复杂的主题及其在研究国家的最新演变提供了一个有趣而丰富的研究领域。强调了两种改革进程和方法之间的异同,以及所取得的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reforming the Normative Frarmework of Public Function: Comparative View of Romanian and French Legislation
The present article offers a brief analysis of the main juridical elements that shape the necessary framework for the organisation and coordination of public function in two administrative systems, namely Romania and France, as well as the most recent normative changes, objectives and accomplishments of public function reform in the two states. Explored mainly through qualitative methods (evaluation of specialized legislation and literature and the comparative approach), the complex topic of public function, and its newest evolutions in the countries under study, offers an interesting and rich field of research. Similarities and differences between the two reform processes and approaches have been highlighted, together with the results attained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信