巴西各地区SARS-CoV-2抗体的显著差异:两次连续全国血清学家庭调查报告

P. Hallal, F. Hartwig, Bernardo Lessa Horta, M. Silveira, C. Struchiner, Luís Paulo Vidaleti, Nelson Arns Neumann, L. Pellanda, O. Dellagostin, M. Burattini, A. Menezes, F. Barros, A. Barros, C. Victora
{"title":"巴西各地区SARS-CoV-2抗体的显著差异:两次连续全国血清学家庭调查报告","authors":"P. Hallal, F. Hartwig, Bernardo Lessa Horta, M. Silveira, C. Struchiner, Luís Paulo Vidaleti, Nelson Arns Neumann, L. Pellanda, O. Dellagostin, M. Burattini, A. Menezes, F. Barros, A. Barros, C. Victora","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3640428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Population based data on COVID-19 are essential for guiding public policies. There are few such studies, particularly from low or middle-income countries. Brazil is currently a hotspot for COVID-19 globally. \n \nMethods: We report on two waves of seroprevalence surveys relying upon on household probabilistic samples of 133 large sentinel cities in all Brazilian states, including 25,025 participants in the first wave (May 14-21) and 31,165 in the second wave (June 4-7). Presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using a lateral flow point-of-care test. Seroprevalence estimates were adjusted for test’s sensitivity and specificity. \n \nResults: For the 83 cities with sample sizes of 200 or more tests in both phases, the pooled seroprevalence increased from 1.9% (95% CI 1.7%;2.1%) to 3.1% (2.8%;3.4%) over the 3-week period. City-level prevalence ranged from 0.0% to 25.4% in both phases. Eleven of the 16 cities with prevalence above 2.0% in the first wave were located in a stretch along the Amazon river in the Northern region; in the second wave, there were 34 cities with prevalence above 2%, which included the same 11 Amazon cities as well as 14 from the Northeast region, where prevalence is increasing rapidly. Prevalence levels were markedly lower in the South and Centre-West regions, and intermediate in the Southeast, where the highest level was found in Rio de Janeiro at 7.5% (4.2%;12.2%) in the second wave. In the second round, prevalence was similar in men and women, but higher levels were observed for subjects aged 20-59 years, and for those living in crowded conditions. Indigenous people had prevalence levels 6.4% (4.1%;9,4%) compared to 1.4% (1.2%;1.7%) among whites. Prevalence in the poorest socioeconomic quintile was 3.7% (3.2%;4.3%) compared to 1.7% (1.4%;2.2%) in the wealthiest quintile. \n \nInterpretation: Our results suggest that pandemic is highly heterogenous, with rapid escalation in Brazil’s North and Northeast, and slow progression in the South and Center-West regions. Prevalence is strongly associated with indigenous ancestry and low socioeconomic position.","PeriodicalId":324969,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remarkable Variability in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies across Brazilian Regions: Report on Two Successive Nationwide Serological Household Surveys\",\"authors\":\"P. Hallal, F. Hartwig, Bernardo Lessa Horta, M. Silveira, C. Struchiner, Luís Paulo Vidaleti, Nelson Arns Neumann, L. Pellanda, O. Dellagostin, M. Burattini, A. Menezes, F. Barros, A. Barros, C. Victora\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3640428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Population based data on COVID-19 are essential for guiding public policies. There are few such studies, particularly from low or middle-income countries. Brazil is currently a hotspot for COVID-19 globally. \\n \\nMethods: We report on two waves of seroprevalence surveys relying upon on household probabilistic samples of 133 large sentinel cities in all Brazilian states, including 25,025 participants in the first wave (May 14-21) and 31,165 in the second wave (June 4-7). Presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using a lateral flow point-of-care test. Seroprevalence estimates were adjusted for test’s sensitivity and specificity. \\n \\nResults: For the 83 cities with sample sizes of 200 or more tests in both phases, the pooled seroprevalence increased from 1.9% (95% CI 1.7%;2.1%) to 3.1% (2.8%;3.4%) over the 3-week period. City-level prevalence ranged from 0.0% to 25.4% in both phases. Eleven of the 16 cities with prevalence above 2.0% in the first wave were located in a stretch along the Amazon river in the Northern region; in the second wave, there were 34 cities with prevalence above 2%, which included the same 11 Amazon cities as well as 14 from the Northeast region, where prevalence is increasing rapidly. Prevalence levels were markedly lower in the South and Centre-West regions, and intermediate in the Southeast, where the highest level was found in Rio de Janeiro at 7.5% (4.2%;12.2%) in the second wave. In the second round, prevalence was similar in men and women, but higher levels were observed for subjects aged 20-59 years, and for those living in crowded conditions. Indigenous people had prevalence levels 6.4% (4.1%;9,4%) compared to 1.4% (1.2%;1.7%) among whites. Prevalence in the poorest socioeconomic quintile was 3.7% (3.2%;4.3%) compared to 1.7% (1.4%;2.2%) in the wealthiest quintile. \\n \\nInterpretation: Our results suggest that pandemic is highly heterogenous, with rapid escalation in Brazil’s North and Northeast, and slow progression in the South and Center-West regions. Prevalence is strongly associated with indigenous ancestry and low socioeconomic position.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640428\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Latin America & the Caribbean (Development) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3640428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:基于人口的COVID-19数据对于指导公共政策至关重要。很少有这样的研究,特别是来自低收入或中等收入国家的研究。巴西目前是全球COVID-19的热点地区。方法:我们报告了两波血清患病率调查,依赖于巴西所有州133个大型哨点城市的家庭概率样本,包括第一波(5月14日至21日)的25,025名参与者和第二波(6月4日至7日)的31,165名参与者。使用横向流动护理点测试评估SARS-CoV-2抗体的存在。根据测试的敏感性和特异性调整血清阳性率估计值。结果:在两阶段样本量为200例及以上的83个城市中,在3周期间,总血清阳性率从1.9%(95%置信区间1.7%;2.1%)上升至3.1%(2.8%;3.4%)。在这两个阶段,城市一级的患病率为0.0%至25.4%。第一波流行率在2.0%以上的16个城市中,有11个位于北部地区亚马孙河沿岸;在第二波中,有34个城市的患病率超过2%,其中包括同样的11个亚马逊城市以及14个来自东北地区的城市,其患病率正在迅速上升。南部和中西部地区的患病率明显较低,东南部处于中等水平,其中里约热内卢的患病率最高,在第二波中为7.5%(4.2%;12.2%)。在第二轮中,男性和女性的患病率相似,但在20-59岁的受试者和生活在拥挤条件下的受试者中观察到更高的水平。土著人的患病率为6.4%(4.1%;9.4%),而白人的患病率为1.4%(1.2%;1.7%)。最贫穷的社会经济五分之一的患病率为3.7%(3.2%;4.3%),而最富裕的五分之一的患病率为1.7%(1.4%;2.2%)。解释:我们的结果表明,大流行具有高度异质性,在巴西北部和东北部迅速升级,而在南部和中西部地区进展缓慢。患病率与土著血统和低社会经济地位密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remarkable Variability in SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies across Brazilian Regions: Report on Two Successive Nationwide Serological Household Surveys
Background: Population based data on COVID-19 are essential for guiding public policies. There are few such studies, particularly from low or middle-income countries. Brazil is currently a hotspot for COVID-19 globally. Methods: We report on two waves of seroprevalence surveys relying upon on household probabilistic samples of 133 large sentinel cities in all Brazilian states, including 25,025 participants in the first wave (May 14-21) and 31,165 in the second wave (June 4-7). Presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 was assessed using a lateral flow point-of-care test. Seroprevalence estimates were adjusted for test’s sensitivity and specificity. Results: For the 83 cities with sample sizes of 200 or more tests in both phases, the pooled seroprevalence increased from 1.9% (95% CI 1.7%;2.1%) to 3.1% (2.8%;3.4%) over the 3-week period. City-level prevalence ranged from 0.0% to 25.4% in both phases. Eleven of the 16 cities with prevalence above 2.0% in the first wave were located in a stretch along the Amazon river in the Northern region; in the second wave, there were 34 cities with prevalence above 2%, which included the same 11 Amazon cities as well as 14 from the Northeast region, where prevalence is increasing rapidly. Prevalence levels were markedly lower in the South and Centre-West regions, and intermediate in the Southeast, where the highest level was found in Rio de Janeiro at 7.5% (4.2%;12.2%) in the second wave. In the second round, prevalence was similar in men and women, but higher levels were observed for subjects aged 20-59 years, and for those living in crowded conditions. Indigenous people had prevalence levels 6.4% (4.1%;9,4%) compared to 1.4% (1.2%;1.7%) among whites. Prevalence in the poorest socioeconomic quintile was 3.7% (3.2%;4.3%) compared to 1.7% (1.4%;2.2%) in the wealthiest quintile. Interpretation: Our results suggest that pandemic is highly heterogenous, with rapid escalation in Brazil’s North and Northeast, and slow progression in the South and Center-West regions. Prevalence is strongly associated with indigenous ancestry and low socioeconomic position.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信