{"title":"直连磁盘子系统性能评估","authors":"R. Chamberlain, B. Shands","doi":"10.1109/SNAPI.2007.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct-attached storage has historically had the reputation of being less capable than equivalently sized SAN installations. Here, we empirically demonstrate the performance achievable in multiple-terabyte, direct-attached disk subsystems. A number of parameters are explored, including file system, number of logical drives, and RAID configuration.","PeriodicalId":347839,"journal":{"name":"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct-Attached Disk Subsystem Performance Assessment\",\"authors\":\"R. Chamberlain, B. Shands\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SNAPI.2007.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Direct-attached storage has historically had the reputation of being less capable than equivalently sized SAN installations. Here, we empirically demonstrate the performance achievable in multiple-terabyte, direct-attached disk subsystems. A number of parameters are explored, including file system, number of logical drives, and RAID configuration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAPI.2007.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fourth International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os (SNAPI 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNAPI.2007.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Direct-Attached Disk Subsystem Performance Assessment
Direct-attached storage has historically had the reputation of being less capable than equivalently sized SAN installations. Here, we empirically demonstrate the performance achievable in multiple-terabyte, direct-attached disk subsystems. A number of parameters are explored, including file system, number of logical drives, and RAID configuration.