IPF与系统性硬化性ILD患者健康相关生活质量的比较

T. Sjåheim, Anna-Maria Hoffman-Vold, T. Eagan, Arnt‐Ove Hovden, M. Lund, G. Bjerke, T. Jonassen, O. Johansen, M. Durheim
{"title":"IPF与系统性硬化性ILD患者健康相关生活质量的比较","authors":"T. Sjåheim, Anna-Maria Hoffman-Vold, T. Eagan, Arnt‐Ove Hovden, M. Lund, G. Bjerke, T. Jonassen, O. Johansen, M. Durheim","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: IPF and systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) are fibrotic ILDs with a poor prognosis. Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important to understand disease trajectory and response to therapy in ILD; however, few studies have compared HRQL in these conditions. Objective: To compare HRQL in SSc-ILD and IPF, independent of lung function. Methods: The Kings Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD), validated to assess HRQL in IPF and scored 0-100 with higher scores indicating better HRQL, was used to compare HRQL between patients with IPF (n=58) and SSc-ILD (n=29) in a multi-center cross-sectional study. ANCOVA was used to compare mean K-BILD score between the IPF and SSc-ILD groups, with adjustment for age, gender, FVC and DLCO. Values are presented as mean (SD). Results: Demographics and lung function are listed in table 1. K-BILD score was 69.4 (17.9) among patients with IPF and 80.5 (21.2) among those with SSc-ILD (p =0.014), indicating slightly better HRQL in SSc-ILD. After covariate adjustment, however, no statistical difference in K-BILD was observed between patients with IPF (70.5 [19.3]) and SSc-ILD (79.8 [21.2], p = 0.096). Conclusions: K-BILD scores appeared to be similar between patients with IPF and SSc-ILD after adjusting for age, gender and lung function. This new observation underscores the impact of lung function impairment on HRQL in ILD and the need for treatments that positively impact HRQL by preserving lung function.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of heath-related quality of life in IPF and systemic sclerosis-related ILD\",\"authors\":\"T. Sjåheim, Anna-Maria Hoffman-Vold, T. Eagan, Arnt‐Ove Hovden, M. Lund, G. Bjerke, T. Jonassen, O. Johansen, M. Durheim\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: IPF and systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) are fibrotic ILDs with a poor prognosis. Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important to understand disease trajectory and response to therapy in ILD; however, few studies have compared HRQL in these conditions. Objective: To compare HRQL in SSc-ILD and IPF, independent of lung function. Methods: The Kings Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD), validated to assess HRQL in IPF and scored 0-100 with higher scores indicating better HRQL, was used to compare HRQL between patients with IPF (n=58) and SSc-ILD (n=29) in a multi-center cross-sectional study. ANCOVA was used to compare mean K-BILD score between the IPF and SSc-ILD groups, with adjustment for age, gender, FVC and DLCO. Values are presented as mean (SD). Results: Demographics and lung function are listed in table 1. K-BILD score was 69.4 (17.9) among patients with IPF and 80.5 (21.2) among those with SSc-ILD (p =0.014), indicating slightly better HRQL in SSc-ILD. After covariate adjustment, however, no statistical difference in K-BILD was observed between patients with IPF (70.5 [19.3]) and SSc-ILD (79.8 [21.2], p = 0.096). Conclusions: K-BILD scores appeared to be similar between patients with IPF and SSc-ILD after adjusting for age, gender and lung function. This new observation underscores the impact of lung function impairment on HRQL in ILD and the need for treatments that positively impact HRQL by preserving lung function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ILD/DPLD of known origin\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ILD/DPLD of known origin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IPF和系统性硬化症(SSc)相关的间质性肺疾病(ILD)是预后较差的纤维化性ILD。健康相关生活质量评估(HRQL)对于了解ILD的疾病轨迹和治疗反应非常重要;然而,很少有研究比较这些情况下的HRQL。目的:比较独立于肺功能的SSc-ILD和IPF的HRQL。方法:在一项多中心横断面研究中,使用king简短间质性肺病问卷(K-BILD)来比较IPF (n=58)和SSc-ILD (n=29)患者的HRQL,该问卷的评分为0-100分,评分越高HRQL越好。采用ANCOVA比较IPF组和SSc-ILD组的平均K-BILD评分,并校正年龄、性别、FVC和DLCO。数值以平均值(SD)表示。结果:人口统计学和肺功能列于表1。IPF患者的K-BILD评分为69.4(17.9)分,SSc-ILD患者的K-BILD评分为80.5(21.2)分(p =0.014), SSc-ILD患者的HRQL略好。但协变量调整后,IPF患者(70.5[19.3])与SSc-ILD患者(79.8 [21.2],p = 0.096) K-BILD无统计学差异。结论:在调整年龄、性别和肺功能后,IPF患者和SSc-ILD患者的K-BILD评分相似。这一新的观察结果强调了肺功能损害对ILD患者HRQL的影响,以及通过保留肺功能来积极影响HRQL的治疗的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparison of heath-related quality of life in IPF and systemic sclerosis-related ILD
Introduction: IPF and systemic sclerosis (SSc)-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) are fibrotic ILDs with a poor prognosis. Assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is important to understand disease trajectory and response to therapy in ILD; however, few studies have compared HRQL in these conditions. Objective: To compare HRQL in SSc-ILD and IPF, independent of lung function. Methods: The Kings Brief Interstitial Lung Disease Questionnaire (K-BILD), validated to assess HRQL in IPF and scored 0-100 with higher scores indicating better HRQL, was used to compare HRQL between patients with IPF (n=58) and SSc-ILD (n=29) in a multi-center cross-sectional study. ANCOVA was used to compare mean K-BILD score between the IPF and SSc-ILD groups, with adjustment for age, gender, FVC and DLCO. Values are presented as mean (SD). Results: Demographics and lung function are listed in table 1. K-BILD score was 69.4 (17.9) among patients with IPF and 80.5 (21.2) among those with SSc-ILD (p =0.014), indicating slightly better HRQL in SSc-ILD. After covariate adjustment, however, no statistical difference in K-BILD was observed between patients with IPF (70.5 [19.3]) and SSc-ILD (79.8 [21.2], p = 0.096). Conclusions: K-BILD scores appeared to be similar between patients with IPF and SSc-ILD after adjusting for age, gender and lung function. This new observation underscores the impact of lung function impairment on HRQL in ILD and the need for treatments that positively impact HRQL by preserving lung function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信