{"title":"审判中的成人收养:多丽丝·杜克等人的利益信托问题。","authors":"E. Carp","doi":"10.1353/ado.2020.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Part memoir, part advocacy, and part original scholarship, this essay tells the story of my experience in 1995 as a legal consultant to prominent New York City law firm Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts. It is adapted from the affidavit I wrote affirming that James Buchanan Duke, the American tobacco tycoon, would have viewed Chandi Duke Heffner, an adopted adult, as a \"lineal descendent,\" within the meaning of the Doris Duke Trust set up by Duke, and thus she was entitled to a fortune estimated at $177 million. James B. Duke (1856–1925) belonged to a class of entrepreneurs who pursued great wealth, steadfast devotion to philanthropy, and the founding of adoption agencies for infants. Beginning in the 1850s, state legislatures enacted adult adoption laws most likely to accommodate the fact that adolescents were often placed in farm families and adopted years later when they had attained adulthood. By the Progressive era, members of the wealthy business class practiced adult adoption to bequeath inheritance, show devotion to young friends, reward service, and continue their philanthropic pursuits after they had died. Adult adoption was treated in the press and among industrialists and upper-class Americans as a normal, acceptable activity, in part because American society was accustomed to adoptions at a late age and in part because adult adoptions fit this class's unique social and financial needs. Duke, like others of his class and era, would have approved of adoption in general and adult adoption in particular.","PeriodicalId":140707,"journal":{"name":"Adoption & Culture","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult Adoption on Trial: In the Matter of the Trust for the Benefit of Doris Duke, et al.\",\"authors\":\"E. Carp\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ado.2020.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Part memoir, part advocacy, and part original scholarship, this essay tells the story of my experience in 1995 as a legal consultant to prominent New York City law firm Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts. It is adapted from the affidavit I wrote affirming that James Buchanan Duke, the American tobacco tycoon, would have viewed Chandi Duke Heffner, an adopted adult, as a \\\"lineal descendent,\\\" within the meaning of the Doris Duke Trust set up by Duke, and thus she was entitled to a fortune estimated at $177 million. James B. Duke (1856–1925) belonged to a class of entrepreneurs who pursued great wealth, steadfast devotion to philanthropy, and the founding of adoption agencies for infants. Beginning in the 1850s, state legislatures enacted adult adoption laws most likely to accommodate the fact that adolescents were often placed in farm families and adopted years later when they had attained adulthood. By the Progressive era, members of the wealthy business class practiced adult adoption to bequeath inheritance, show devotion to young friends, reward service, and continue their philanthropic pursuits after they had died. Adult adoption was treated in the press and among industrialists and upper-class Americans as a normal, acceptable activity, in part because American society was accustomed to adoptions at a late age and in part because adult adoptions fit this class's unique social and financial needs. Duke, like others of his class and era, would have approved of adoption in general and adult adoption in particular.\",\"PeriodicalId\":140707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adoption & Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2020.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adoption & Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ado.2020.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:这篇文章讲述了我1995年在纽约著名律师事务所Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts担任法律顾问的经历。它改编自我写的一份宣誓书,宣誓书中说,美国烟草大亨詹姆斯·布坎南·杜克(James Buchanan Duke)将被收养的成年人钱迪·杜克·赫夫纳(Chandi Duke Heffner)视为杜克设立的多丽丝·杜克信托基金(Doris Duke Trust)意义上的“直系后裔”,因此她有权获得一笔估计为1.77亿美元的财产。詹姆斯·b·杜克(James B. Duke, 1856-1925)属于追求巨额财富、坚定地投身慈善事业、创办婴儿收养机构的企业家阶层。从19世纪50年代开始,各州立法机构颁布了成人收养法,这很可能是为了适应青少年通常被安置在农场家庭,并在成年后被收养的事实。到了进步时代,富有的商业阶层成员通过收养成人来继承遗产,向年轻的朋友表示忠诚,奖励服务,并在他们死后继续他们的慈善事业。在新闻界、实业家和美国上层阶级中,成年人收养被视为一种正常的、可以接受的活动,部分原因是美国社会习惯于在晚年收养人,部分原因是成年人收养符合该阶层独特的社会和经济需求。杜克和他那个阶级和时代的其他人一样,一般会赞成收养,尤其是成人收养。
Adult Adoption on Trial: In the Matter of the Trust for the Benefit of Doris Duke, et al.
ABSTRACT:Part memoir, part advocacy, and part original scholarship, this essay tells the story of my experience in 1995 as a legal consultant to prominent New York City law firm Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts. It is adapted from the affidavit I wrote affirming that James Buchanan Duke, the American tobacco tycoon, would have viewed Chandi Duke Heffner, an adopted adult, as a "lineal descendent," within the meaning of the Doris Duke Trust set up by Duke, and thus she was entitled to a fortune estimated at $177 million. James B. Duke (1856–1925) belonged to a class of entrepreneurs who pursued great wealth, steadfast devotion to philanthropy, and the founding of adoption agencies for infants. Beginning in the 1850s, state legislatures enacted adult adoption laws most likely to accommodate the fact that adolescents were often placed in farm families and adopted years later when they had attained adulthood. By the Progressive era, members of the wealthy business class practiced adult adoption to bequeath inheritance, show devotion to young friends, reward service, and continue their philanthropic pursuits after they had died. Adult adoption was treated in the press and among industrialists and upper-class Americans as a normal, acceptable activity, in part because American society was accustomed to adoptions at a late age and in part because adult adoptions fit this class's unique social and financial needs. Duke, like others of his class and era, would have approved of adoption in general and adult adoption in particular.