编辑器的介绍

Lance Neckar, D. Pitt
{"title":"编辑器的介绍","authors":"Lance Neckar, D. Pitt","doi":"10.1515/9781503620636-002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academic integrity is of great importance to insure a consistent determination of what constitutes plagiarism across regions of the world. Academic integrity research spans a global scale and regardless of where the researcher is from, they are building on a pool of research findings that have no physical boundaries. Basic agreed upon research standards and fundamentals must be established to ensure the validity and reliability of the body of academic research. Problematic to the situation are differences in cultural definitions of what constitutes plagiarism. Therefore, this study aimed to build the body of knowledge on the current condition of plagiarism levels as well as perform a sample comparison of some patterns in Eastern and Western culture. A document analysis was conducted for two universities, one in the USA and one in Saudi Arabia. In addition, a survey was conducted in an academic context in Saudi Arabia to investigate students’ and faculty’s understanding of what constitutes plagiarism. It was predicted that Saudi Arabia is shifting towards a Westernized definition of plagiarism; results partially supported this hypothesis. ت ع ت ب ر ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ذ ا ت أ ھ م ی ة ك ب ی ر ة ل ض م ا ن ت ح د ی د ث ا ب ت ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل ع ب ر م ن ا ط ق ا ل ع ا ل م . ت م ت د أ ب ح ا ث ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ع ل ى ن ط ا ق ع ا ل م ي و ب غ ض ا ل ن ظ ر ع ن ا ل م ك ا ن ا ل ذ ي ی ن ت م ي إ ل ی ھ ا ل ب ا ح ث ، ف ھ ي ت ع ت م د ع ل ى م ج م و ع ة م ن ن ت ا ئ ج ا لأ ب ح ا ث ا ل ت ي لا ت و ج د ل ھ ا ح د و د م ا د ی ة . ی ج ب و ض ع ا ل م ع ا ی ی ر ا لأ س ا س ی ة ا ل م ت ف ق ع ل ی ھ ا و ا لأ س ا س ی ا ت ل ض م ا ن ص ح ة و م و ث و ق ی ة ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ب ح ث ا لأ ك ا د ی م ي . ا لإ ش ك ا ل ی ة ف ي ا ل م و ق ف ھ ي ا خ ت لا ف ا ت ف ي ا ل ت ع ر ی ف ا ت ا ل ث ق ا ف ی ة ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . و ل ذ ل ك ، ھ د ف ت ھ ذ ه ا ل د ر ا س ة إ ل ى ب ن ا ء ج س د ا ل م ع ر ف ة ح و ل ا ل ح ا ل ة ا ل ر ا ھ ن ة ل م س ت و ی ا ت ا لا ن ت ح ا ل و ك ذ ل ك إ ج ر ا ء م ق ا ر ن ة ن م و ذ ج ی ة ل ب ع ض ا لأ ن م ا ط ف ي ا ل ث ق ا ف ة ا ل ش ر ق ی ة و ا ل غ ر ب ی ة . ت م إ ج ر ا ء ت ح ل ی ل ل ل و ث ا ئ ق ل ج ا م ع ت ی ن ، و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل و لا ی ا ت ا ل م ت ح د ة ا لأ م ر ی ك ی ة و و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة . ب ا لإ ض ا ف ة إ ل ى ذ ل ك ، أ ج ر ی ت د ر ا س ة ا س ت ق ص ا ئ ی ة ف ي س ی ا ق أ ك ا د ی م ي ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ل ل ت ح ق ی ق ف ي ف ھ م ا ل ط لا ب و ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ت د ر ی س ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . ك ا ن م ن ا ل م ت و ق ع أ ن ت ت ج ھ ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ن ح و ت ع ر ی ف ا ل غ ر ب ی ی ن ل لا ن ت ح ا ل و ق د د ع م ت ا ل ن ت ا ئ ج ھ ذ ه ا ل ف ر ض ی ة ج ز ئ ی ا .","PeriodicalId":442323,"journal":{"name":"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1958-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Lance Neckar, D. Pitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9781503620636-002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Academic integrity is of great importance to insure a consistent determination of what constitutes plagiarism across regions of the world. Academic integrity research spans a global scale and regardless of where the researcher is from, they are building on a pool of research findings that have no physical boundaries. Basic agreed upon research standards and fundamentals must be established to ensure the validity and reliability of the body of academic research. Problematic to the situation are differences in cultural definitions of what constitutes plagiarism. Therefore, this study aimed to build the body of knowledge on the current condition of plagiarism levels as well as perform a sample comparison of some patterns in Eastern and Western culture. A document analysis was conducted for two universities, one in the USA and one in Saudi Arabia. In addition, a survey was conducted in an academic context in Saudi Arabia to investigate students’ and faculty’s understanding of what constitutes plagiarism. It was predicted that Saudi Arabia is shifting towards a Westernized definition of plagiarism; results partially supported this hypothesis. ت ع ت ب ر ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ذ ا ت أ ھ م ی ة ك ب ی ر ة ل ض م ا ن ت ح د ی د ث ا ب ت ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل ع ب ر م ن ا ط ق ا ل ع ا ل م . ت م ت د أ ب ح ا ث ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ع ل ى ن ط ا ق ع ا ل م ي و ب غ ض ا ل ن ظ ر ع ن ا ل م ك ا ن ا ل ذ ي ی ن ت م ي إ ل ی ھ ا ل ب ا ح ث ، ف ھ ي ت ع ت م د ع ل ى م ج م و ع ة م ن ن ت ا ئ ج ا لأ ب ح ا ث ا ل ت ي لا ت و ج د ل ھ ا ح د و د م ا د ی ة . ی ج ب و ض ع ا ل م ع ا ی ی ر ا لأ س ا س ی ة ا ل م ت ف ق ع ل ی ھ ا و ا لأ س ا س ی ا ت ل ض م ا ن ص ح ة و م و ث و ق ی ة ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ب ح ث ا لأ ك ا د ی م ي . ا لإ ش ك ا ل ی ة ف ي ا ل م و ق ف ھ ي ا خ ت لا ف ا ت ف ي ا ل ت ع ر ی ف ا ت ا ل ث ق ا ف ی ة ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . و ل ذ ل ك ، ھ د ف ت ھ ذ ه ا ل د ر ا س ة إ ل ى ب ن ا ء ج س د ا ل م ع ر ف ة ح و ل ا ل ح ا ل ة ا ل ر ا ھ ن ة ل م س ت و ی ا ت ا لا ن ت ح ا ل و ك ذ ل ك إ ج ر ا ء م ق ا ر ن ة ن م و ذ ج ی ة ل ب ع ض ا لأ ن م ا ط ف ي ا ل ث ق ا ف ة ا ل ش ر ق ی ة و ا ل غ ر ب ی ة . ت م إ ج ر ا ء ت ح ل ی ل ل ل و ث ا ئ ق ل ج ا م ع ت ی ن ، و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل و لا ی ا ت ا ل م ت ح د ة ا لأ م ر ی ك ی ة و و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة . ب ا لإ ض ا ف ة إ ل ى ذ ل ك ، أ ج ر ی ت د ر ا س ة ا س ت ق ص ا ئ ی ة ف ي س ی ا ق أ ك ا د ی م ي ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ل ل ت ح ق ی ق ف ي ف ھ م ا ل ط لا ب و ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ت د ر ی س ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . ك ا ن م ن ا ل م ت و ق ع أ ن ت ت ج ھ ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ن ح و ت ع ر ی ف ا ل غ ر ب ی ی ن ل لا ن ت ح ا ل و ق د د ع م ت ا ل ن ت ا ئ ج ھ ذ ه ا ل ف ر ض ی ة ج ز ئ ی ا .\",\"PeriodicalId\":442323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1958-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620636-002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape Journal: design, planning, and management of the land","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620636-002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学术诚信是非常重要的,以确保一个一致的决定什么构成抄袭在世界各地。学术诚信研究跨越全球范围,无论研究人员来自哪里,他们都是建立在一个没有物理界限的研究成果库上。必须建立基本的商定的研究标准和基础,以确保学术研究的有效性和可靠性。造成这种情况的问题在于,不同文化对剽窃的定义不同。因此,本研究旨在建立关于剽窃水平现状的知识体系,并对东西方文化中的一些模式进行样本比较。对两所大学进行了文献分析,一所在美国,一所在沙特阿拉伯。此外,在沙特阿拉伯的学术背景下进行了一项调查,以调查学生和教师对什么是抄袭的理解。有人预测,沙特阿拉伯正在转向对抄袭的西方化定义;结果部分支持这一假设。تعتبرالنزاھةالأكادیمیةذاتأھمیةكبیرةلضمانتحدیدثابتلمایشكلالانتحالعبرمناطقالعالم。تمتدأبحاثالنزاھةالأكادیمیةعلىنطاقعالميوبغضالنظرعنالمكانالذيینتميإلیھالباحث،فھيتعتمدعلىمجموعةمننتائجالأبحاثالتيلاتوجدلھاحدودمادیة。یجبوضعالمعاییرالأساسیةالمتفقعلیھاوالأساسیاتلضمانصحةوموثوقیةھیئةالبحثالأكادیمي。الإشكالیةفيالموقفھياختلافاتفيالتعریفاتالثقافیةلمایشكلالانتحال。ولذلك،ھدفتھذهالدراسةإلىبناءجسدالمعرفةحولالحالةالراھنةلمستویاتالانتحالوكذلكإجراءمقارنةنموذجیةلبعضالأنماطفيالثقافةالشرقیةوالغربیة。تمإجراءتحلیلللوثائقلجامعتین،واحدةفيالولایاتالمتحدةالأمریكیةوواحدةفيالمملكةالعربیةالسعودیة。بالإضافةإلىذلك،أجریتدراسةاستقصائیةفيسیاقأكادیميفيالمملكةالعربیةالسعودیةللتحقیقفيفھمالطلابوھیئةالتدریسلمایشكلالانتحال。كانمنالمتوقعأنتتجھالمملكةالعربیةالسعودیةنحوتعریفالغربیینللانتحالوقددعمتالنتائجھذهالفرضیةجزئیا。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Editor’s Introduction
Academic integrity is of great importance to insure a consistent determination of what constitutes plagiarism across regions of the world. Academic integrity research spans a global scale and regardless of where the researcher is from, they are building on a pool of research findings that have no physical boundaries. Basic agreed upon research standards and fundamentals must be established to ensure the validity and reliability of the body of academic research. Problematic to the situation are differences in cultural definitions of what constitutes plagiarism. Therefore, this study aimed to build the body of knowledge on the current condition of plagiarism levels as well as perform a sample comparison of some patterns in Eastern and Western culture. A document analysis was conducted for two universities, one in the USA and one in Saudi Arabia. In addition, a survey was conducted in an academic context in Saudi Arabia to investigate students’ and faculty’s understanding of what constitutes plagiarism. It was predicted that Saudi Arabia is shifting towards a Westernized definition of plagiarism; results partially supported this hypothesis. ت ع ت ب ر ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ذ ا ت أ ھ م ی ة ك ب ی ر ة ل ض م ا ن ت ح د ی د ث ا ب ت ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل ع ب ر م ن ا ط ق ا ل ع ا ل م . ت م ت د أ ب ح ا ث ا ل ن ز ا ھ ة ا لأ ك ا د ی م ی ة ع ل ى ن ط ا ق ع ا ل م ي و ب غ ض ا ل ن ظ ر ع ن ا ل م ك ا ن ا ل ذ ي ی ن ت م ي إ ل ی ھ ا ل ب ا ح ث ، ف ھ ي ت ع ت م د ع ل ى م ج م و ع ة م ن ن ت ا ئ ج ا لأ ب ح ا ث ا ل ت ي لا ت و ج د ل ھ ا ح د و د م ا د ی ة . ی ج ب و ض ع ا ل م ع ا ی ی ر ا لأ س ا س ی ة ا ل م ت ف ق ع ل ی ھ ا و ا لأ س ا س ی ا ت ل ض م ا ن ص ح ة و م و ث و ق ی ة ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ب ح ث ا لأ ك ا د ی م ي . ا لإ ش ك ا ل ی ة ف ي ا ل م و ق ف ھ ي ا خ ت لا ف ا ت ف ي ا ل ت ع ر ی ف ا ت ا ل ث ق ا ف ی ة ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . و ل ذ ل ك ، ھ د ف ت ھ ذ ه ا ل د ر ا س ة إ ل ى ب ن ا ء ج س د ا ل م ع ر ف ة ح و ل ا ل ح ا ل ة ا ل ر ا ھ ن ة ل م س ت و ی ا ت ا لا ن ت ح ا ل و ك ذ ل ك إ ج ر ا ء م ق ا ر ن ة ن م و ذ ج ی ة ل ب ع ض ا لأ ن م ا ط ف ي ا ل ث ق ا ف ة ا ل ش ر ق ی ة و ا ل غ ر ب ی ة . ت م إ ج ر ا ء ت ح ل ی ل ل ل و ث ا ئ ق ل ج ا م ع ت ی ن ، و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل و لا ی ا ت ا ل م ت ح د ة ا لأ م ر ی ك ی ة و و ا ح د ة ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة . ب ا لإ ض ا ف ة إ ل ى ذ ل ك ، أ ج ر ی ت د ر ا س ة ا س ت ق ص ا ئ ی ة ف ي س ی ا ق أ ك ا د ی م ي ف ي ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ل ل ت ح ق ی ق ف ي ف ھ م ا ل ط لا ب و ھ ی ئ ة ا ل ت د ر ی س ل م ا ی ش ك ل ا لا ن ت ح ا ل . ك ا ن م ن ا ل م ت و ق ع أ ن ت ت ج ھ ا ل م م ل ك ة ا ل ع ر ب ی ة ا ل س ع و د ی ة ن ح و ت ع ر ی ف ا ل غ ر ب ی ی ن ل لا ن ت ح ا ل و ق د د ع م ت ا ل ن ت ا ئ ج ھ ذ ه ا ل ف ر ض ی ة ج ز ئ ی ا .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信