孤岛微电网集中式与分布式能源管理系统可靠性评估与比较

Zheyuan Cheng, Jie Duan, M. Chow
{"title":"孤岛微电网集中式与分布式能源管理系统可靠性评估与比较","authors":"Zheyuan Cheng, Jie Duan, M. Chow","doi":"10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the number of DER in the microgrid increases, the electrical interfaces and communication interactions are more sophisticated and frequent than ever, which poses a great challenge for microgrid Energy Management System (EMS). Efforts has been made to address this challenge. The solutions generally fall into two categories: centralized and distributed solution. Comparing with centralized EMS, distributed EMS is commonly considered as a more promising and reliable approach. Nonetheless, the current microgrid reliability research are focused on the physical layer of microgrid, such as overhead lines, transformers, circuit breakers and the DER device itself. The reliability analysis that considers controller failure and EMS framework are not reported in current publications. In this paper, a general reliability assessment methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation is presented to assess the reliability of both centralized EMS and distributed EMS in islanding microgrid. Different performance metrics such as system-average-interruption-frequency-index (SAIFI) and expected-energy-not-supplied (EENS) are used to quantify and evaluate the reliability. Simulation results indicates that using the same controller, the microgrid with distributed EMS is able to achieve better reliability indices, and the distributed EMS can achieve same level of reliability using less reliable controllers.","PeriodicalId":296428,"journal":{"name":"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability assessment and comparison between centralized and distributed energy management system in islanding microgrid\",\"authors\":\"Zheyuan Cheng, Jie Duan, M. Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the number of DER in the microgrid increases, the electrical interfaces and communication interactions are more sophisticated and frequent than ever, which poses a great challenge for microgrid Energy Management System (EMS). Efforts has been made to address this challenge. The solutions generally fall into two categories: centralized and distributed solution. Comparing with centralized EMS, distributed EMS is commonly considered as a more promising and reliable approach. Nonetheless, the current microgrid reliability research are focused on the physical layer of microgrid, such as overhead lines, transformers, circuit breakers and the DER device itself. The reliability analysis that considers controller failure and EMS framework are not reported in current publications. In this paper, a general reliability assessment methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation is presented to assess the reliability of both centralized EMS and distributed EMS in islanding microgrid. Different performance metrics such as system-average-interruption-frequency-index (SAIFI) and expected-energy-not-supplied (EENS) are used to quantify and evaluate the reliability. Simulation results indicates that using the same controller, the microgrid with distributed EMS is able to achieve better reliability indices, and the distributed EMS can achieve same level of reliability using less reliable controllers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 North American Power Symposium (NAPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NAPS.2017.8107366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

随着微电网中分布式电源数量的增加,其电气接口和通信交互更加复杂和频繁,这对微电网能源管理系统(EMS)提出了巨大的挑战。已经为应对这一挑战作出了努力。解决方案通常分为两类:集中式解决方案和分布式解决方案。与集中式EMS相比,分布式EMS通常被认为是一种更有前途和更可靠的方法。然而,目前对微电网可靠性的研究主要集中在微电网的物理层,如架空线路、变压器、断路器和DER设备本身。考虑控制器失效和EMS框架的可靠性分析目前尚未见报道。本文提出了一种基于蒙特卡罗仿真的通用可靠性评估方法,用于孤岛微电网集中式和分布式电力管理系统的可靠性评估。采用系统平均中断频率指数(SAIFI)和期望不供应能量(EENS)等不同的性能指标来量化和评估可靠性。仿真结果表明,使用相同的控制器,分布式EMS微网能够获得更好的可靠性指标,而使用较少的可靠度控制器,分布式EMS可以达到相同的可靠性水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability assessment and comparison between centralized and distributed energy management system in islanding microgrid
As the number of DER in the microgrid increases, the electrical interfaces and communication interactions are more sophisticated and frequent than ever, which poses a great challenge for microgrid Energy Management System (EMS). Efforts has been made to address this challenge. The solutions generally fall into two categories: centralized and distributed solution. Comparing with centralized EMS, distributed EMS is commonly considered as a more promising and reliable approach. Nonetheless, the current microgrid reliability research are focused on the physical layer of microgrid, such as overhead lines, transformers, circuit breakers and the DER device itself. The reliability analysis that considers controller failure and EMS framework are not reported in current publications. In this paper, a general reliability assessment methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation is presented to assess the reliability of both centralized EMS and distributed EMS in islanding microgrid. Different performance metrics such as system-average-interruption-frequency-index (SAIFI) and expected-energy-not-supplied (EENS) are used to quantify and evaluate the reliability. Simulation results indicates that using the same controller, the microgrid with distributed EMS is able to achieve better reliability indices, and the distributed EMS can achieve same level of reliability using less reliable controllers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信