捷克版鼻塞症状评价量表(NOSE-cz)的改编与验证

Z. Hornáčková, L. Otruba, R. Kaňa, Jakub Fuksa, P. Schalek
{"title":"捷克版鼻塞症状评价量表(NOSE-cz)的改编与验证","authors":"Z. Hornáčková, L. Otruba, R. Kaňa, Jakub Fuksa, P. Schalek","doi":"10.48095/ccorl20229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nasal obstruction is one of the most common symptoms in rhinology. In 2004, Stewart published a very simple instrument of nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), which has already been adapted and validated in a number of languages. The aim of this study was to validate the Czech version of the questionnaire (NOSE-cz). Materials and Methods: Two-centre prospective instrument validation study. The psychometric properties (reliability, validity, sensitivity) of the Czech version were assessed in 72 patients undergoing (rhino) septoplasty and 39 asymptomatic controls. Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.796 and 0.691 before and after surgery, respectively) and test-retest reliability (Pearson’s test, 0.74; P <0.0001) were very good. The instrument showed excellent discrimination between groups (two sample t-test; P <0.0001) and sensitivity (standardised response mean 2.53). Conclusions: The Czech version of NOSE (NOSE-cz) demonstrated good to excellent psychometric properties and its use is recommended for daily clinical practice and research. Keywords: Quality of life – nasal obstruction – validation – NOSE scale – septoplasty","PeriodicalId":423943,"journal":{"name":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation and validation of the Czech version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE-cz)\",\"authors\":\"Z. Hornáčková, L. Otruba, R. Kaňa, Jakub Fuksa, P. Schalek\",\"doi\":\"10.48095/ccorl20229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nasal obstruction is one of the most common symptoms in rhinology. In 2004, Stewart published a very simple instrument of nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), which has already been adapted and validated in a number of languages. The aim of this study was to validate the Czech version of the questionnaire (NOSE-cz). Materials and Methods: Two-centre prospective instrument validation study. The psychometric properties (reliability, validity, sensitivity) of the Czech version were assessed in 72 patients undergoing (rhino) septoplasty and 39 asymptomatic controls. Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.796 and 0.691 before and after surgery, respectively) and test-retest reliability (Pearson’s test, 0.74; P <0.0001) were very good. The instrument showed excellent discrimination between groups (two sample t-test; P <0.0001) and sensitivity (standardised response mean 2.53). Conclusions: The Czech version of NOSE (NOSE-cz) demonstrated good to excellent psychometric properties and its use is recommended for daily clinical practice and research. Keywords: Quality of life – nasal obstruction – validation – NOSE scale – septoplasty\",\"PeriodicalId\":423943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl20229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otorinolaryngologie a foniatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccorl20229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼻塞是鼻内科最常见的症状之一。2004年,Stewart发表了一种非常简单的鼻塞症状评估仪器(NOSE),该仪器已经被多种语言改编和验证。本研究的目的是验证捷克版问卷(NOSE-cz)。材料和方法:双中心前瞻性仪器验证研究。在72例(犀牛)鼻中隔成形术患者和39例无症状对照中评估捷克版的心理测量特性(信度、效度、灵敏度)。结果:内部一致性(术前、术后Cronbach’s alpha分别为0.796、0.691)、重测信度(Pearson’s test, 0.74;P <0.0001)非常好。该仪器显示出极好的组间判别性(两样本t检验;P <0.0001)和敏感性(标准化反应平均值2.53)。结论:捷克语版NOSE (NOSE-cz)具有良好的心理测量性能,推荐用于日常临床实践和研究。关键词:生活质量;鼻塞;验证
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation and validation of the Czech version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation scale (NOSE-cz)
Background: Nasal obstruction is one of the most common symptoms in rhinology. In 2004, Stewart published a very simple instrument of nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE), which has already been adapted and validated in a number of languages. The aim of this study was to validate the Czech version of the questionnaire (NOSE-cz). Materials and Methods: Two-centre prospective instrument validation study. The psychometric properties (reliability, validity, sensitivity) of the Czech version were assessed in 72 patients undergoing (rhino) septoplasty and 39 asymptomatic controls. Results: Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.796 and 0.691 before and after surgery, respectively) and test-retest reliability (Pearson’s test, 0.74; P <0.0001) were very good. The instrument showed excellent discrimination between groups (two sample t-test; P <0.0001) and sensitivity (standardised response mean 2.53). Conclusions: The Czech version of NOSE (NOSE-cz) demonstrated good to excellent psychometric properties and its use is recommended for daily clinical practice and research. Keywords: Quality of life – nasal obstruction – validation – NOSE scale – septoplasty
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信