规范退休财务建议-最近澳大利亚的改革

Pamela Hanrahan
{"title":"规范退休财务建议-最近澳大利亚的改革","authors":"Pamela Hanrahan","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2933946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses reforms to regulation of financial advice, including advice for retirement, made in Australia since 2012 – the FoFA changes, the introduction of the ASIC adviser register, and the recent enactment of new competency and professionalism requirements for individual advisers. It suggests that the ‘best interests’ reforms may be more consistent with a requirement of fairness, than a true fiduciary standard. It argues that the competency requirements to be phased in over the next seven years need to emphasise the skills that advisers require to utilise advances in technology for retirement planning.","PeriodicalId":137765,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulating Financial Advice for Retirement – The Recent Australian Reforms\",\"authors\":\"Pamela Hanrahan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2933946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses reforms to regulation of financial advice, including advice for retirement, made in Australia since 2012 – the FoFA changes, the introduction of the ASIC adviser register, and the recent enactment of new competency and professionalism requirements for individual advisers. It suggests that the ‘best interests’ reforms may be more consistent with a requirement of fairness, than a true fiduciary standard. It argues that the competency requirements to be phased in over the next seven years need to emphasise the skills that advisers require to utilise advances in technology for retirement planning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2933946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law - Financial Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2933946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了澳大利亚自2012年以来对金融咨询(包括退休建议)监管的改革——FoFA的变化,ASIC顾问注册制度的引入,以及最近对个人顾问的新能力和专业要求的颁布。它表明,“最大利益”改革可能更符合公平的要求,而不是真正的信托标准。它认为,未来7年将逐步实施的能力要求,需要强调顾问在利用技术进步进行退休规划方面所需要的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulating Financial Advice for Retirement – The Recent Australian Reforms
This paper discusses reforms to regulation of financial advice, including advice for retirement, made in Australia since 2012 – the FoFA changes, the introduction of the ASIC adviser register, and the recent enactment of new competency and professionalism requirements for individual advisers. It suggests that the ‘best interests’ reforms may be more consistent with a requirement of fairness, than a true fiduciary standard. It argues that the competency requirements to be phased in over the next seven years need to emphasise the skills that advisers require to utilise advances in technology for retirement planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信