虚拟组件协同设计环境下嵌入式系统性能分析

P. Garg, Aseem Gupta, J. Rozenblit
{"title":"虚拟组件协同设计环境下嵌入式系统性能分析","authors":"P. Garg, Aseem Gupta, J. Rozenblit","doi":"10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the increasing complexity of embedded systems in terms of functionality and architectural resources available to meet performance and cost criteria, there is an added responsibility on the designer to make the right choices. These choices can differ in terms of different hardware/software partitions, different types of architectural components, different communication architectures etc. and each choice meets certain performance metrics up to certain level. In this paper, we are exploring the design space to analyze different choices of design implementations by quantitative estimation of performance during simulation. Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods are used to rank our choices. To demonstrate the validity of the above exploration technique, a codesign tool from Cadence - virtual component codesign (VCC) is used. It gives us the flexibility to create the experimental frame setup and probes to measure the performance metrics during simulations. The tradeoffs between performance metrics are performed by MCDM. A safety critical example is chosen to demonstrate our approach.","PeriodicalId":137219,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of embedded systems in the virtual component co-design environment\",\"authors\":\"P. Garg, Aseem Gupta, J. Rozenblit\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the increasing complexity of embedded systems in terms of functionality and architectural resources available to meet performance and cost criteria, there is an added responsibility on the designer to make the right choices. These choices can differ in terms of different hardware/software partitions, different types of architectural components, different communication architectures etc. and each choice meets certain performance metrics up to certain level. In this paper, we are exploring the design space to analyze different choices of design implementations by quantitative estimation of performance during simulation. Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods are used to rank our choices. To demonstrate the validity of the above exploration technique, a codesign tool from Cadence - virtual component codesign (VCC) is used. It gives us the flexibility to create the experimental frame setup and probes to measure the performance metrics during simulations. The tradeoffs between performance metrics are performed by MCDM. A safety critical example is chosen to demonstrate our approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECBS.2004.1316683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

由于嵌入式系统在满足性能和成本标准的功能和架构资源方面的复杂性不断增加,因此设计人员有责任做出正确的选择。这些选择可以根据不同的硬件/软件分区、不同类型的架构组件、不同的通信架构等而有所不同,每种选择都符合特定级别的特定性能指标。在本文中,我们正在探索设计空间,通过在仿真过程中对性能的定量估计来分析设计实现的不同选择。使用多标准决策(MCDM)方法对我们的选择进行排序。为了证明上述探索技术的有效性,使用了Cadence公司的一个协同设计工具——虚拟组件协同设计(VCC)。它使我们能够灵活地创建实验框架设置和探针来测量模拟期间的性能指标。性能指标之间的权衡由MCDM执行。选择一个安全关键示例来演示我们的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance analysis of embedded systems in the virtual component co-design environment
Due to the increasing complexity of embedded systems in terms of functionality and architectural resources available to meet performance and cost criteria, there is an added responsibility on the designer to make the right choices. These choices can differ in terms of different hardware/software partitions, different types of architectural components, different communication architectures etc. and each choice meets certain performance metrics up to certain level. In this paper, we are exploring the design space to analyze different choices of design implementations by quantitative estimation of performance during simulation. Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods are used to rank our choices. To demonstrate the validity of the above exploration technique, a codesign tool from Cadence - virtual component codesign (VCC) is used. It gives us the flexibility to create the experimental frame setup and probes to measure the performance metrics during simulations. The tradeoffs between performance metrics are performed by MCDM. A safety critical example is chosen to demonstrate our approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信