关于结构化编程的两个误解

ACM '75 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800181.810321

P. Denning

{"title":"关于结构化编程的两个误解","authors":"P. Denning","doi":"10.1145/800181.810321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For some time I and others have been exhorting promoters of 'structured programming' to define what they mean by it. To my delight this has been happening more and more frequently. Yet, as they pen their definitions, many writers are revealing their ignorance of the basic issues to which Dahl, Dijkstra, Hoare, Knuth, Wirth and others have attempted to draw our attention when discussing 'structured programming' [11, 14, 22, 23, 30, 31]. Two misconceptions in particular have been turning up with alarming frequency.","PeriodicalId":447373,"journal":{"name":"ACM '75","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two misconceptions about structured programming\",\"authors\":\"P. Denning\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800181.810321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For some time I and others have been exhorting promoters of 'structured programming' to define what they mean by it. To my delight this has been happening more and more frequently. Yet, as they pen their definitions, many writers are revealing their ignorance of the basic issues to which Dahl, Dijkstra, Hoare, Knuth, Wirth and others have attempted to draw our attention when discussing 'structured programming' [11, 14, 22, 23, 30, 31]. Two misconceptions in particular have been turning up with alarming frequency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM '75\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM '75\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800181.810321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '75","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800181.810321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

一段时间以来，我和其他人一直在敦促“结构化编程”的推动者定义他们对它的理解。令我高兴的是，这种情况越来越频繁地发生了。然而，当他们写下他们的定义时，许多作者暴露出他们对基本问题的无知，而Dahl, Dijkstra, Hoare, Knuth, Wirth和其他人在讨论“结构化编程”时试图引起我们的注意[11,14,22,23,30,31]。特别是有两个误解以惊人的频率出现。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Two misconceptions about structured programming

For some time I and others have been exhorting promoters of 'structured programming' to define what they mean by it. To my delight this has been happening more and more frequently. Yet, as they pen their definitions, many writers are revealing their ignorance of the basic issues to which Dahl, Dijkstra, Hoare, Knuth, Wirth and others have attempted to draw our attention when discussing 'structured programming' [11, 14, 22, 23, 30, 31]. Two misconceptions in particular have been turning up with alarming frequency.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACM '75

自引率

0.00%

发文量