腹主动脉瘤的治疗指南:来自意大利血管和血管内外科学会(SICVE)的更新。

C. Pratesi, D. Esposito, D. Apostolou, L. Attisani, R. Bellosta, F. Benedetto, I. Blangetti, S. Bonardelli, A. Casini, A. Fargion, E. Favaretto, A. Freyrie, Edoardo Frola, V. Miele, R. Niola, C. Novali, Chiara Panzera, M. Pegorer, P. Perini, G. Piffaretti, R. Pini, A. Robaldo, M. Sartori, Alfonso Stigliano, M. Taurino, P. Veroux, F. Verzini, Erica Zaninelli, M. Orso
{"title":"腹主动脉瘤的治疗指南:来自意大利血管和血管内外科学会(SICVE)的更新。","authors":"C. Pratesi, D. Esposito, D. Apostolou, L. Attisani, R. Bellosta, F. Benedetto, I. Blangetti, S. Bonardelli, A. Casini, A. Fargion, E. Favaretto, A. Freyrie, Edoardo Frola, V. Miele, R. Niola, C. Novali, Chiara Panzera, M. Pegorer, P. Perini, G. Piffaretti, R. Pini, A. Robaldo, M. Sartori, Alfonso Stigliano, M. Taurino, P. Veroux, F. Verzini, Erica Zaninelli, M. Orso","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12330-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE).\",\"authors\":\"C. Pratesi, D. Esposito, D. Apostolou, L. Attisani, R. Bellosta, F. Benedetto, I. Blangetti, S. Bonardelli, A. Casini, A. Fargion, E. Favaretto, A. Freyrie, Edoardo Frola, V. Miele, R. Niola, C. Novali, Chiara Panzera, M. Pegorer, P. Perini, G. Piffaretti, R. Pini, A. Robaldo, M. Sartori, Alfonso Stigliano, M. Taurino, P. Veroux, F. Verzini, Erica Zaninelli, M. Orso\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12330-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12330-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.22.12330-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本指南的目的是根据国家指南系统(SNLG)修订和更新之前的2016年意大利腹主动脉瘤疾病指南,以指导每位从业者走向最正确的治疗途径。本次更新中应用的方法是GRADE-SIGN版本方法,并遵循了AGREE报告质量检查表的说明。第一个方法学步骤是根据PICO(人口、干预、比较、结果)模型制定临床问题,《建议》就是根据PICO模型发布的。然后,对每个PICO问题或同质问题组进行文献系统综述,然后选择文章并使用定性检查表评估每一篇文章的方法学质量。最后,为每个临床问题填写一份考虑的判断表,其中评估证据的整体特征,以建立从证据水平到建议方向和强度的过渡。这些指南概述了腹主动脉瘤患者在筛查和监测方面的正确管理。讨论了医疗管理和手术指征,以及术前对患者背景和手术风险评估的评估。一旦确定了手术指征,就对传统的开放手术和血管内手术的选择进行描述和比较,并特别关注腹主动脉瘤破裂患者。最后,介绍了术后早期和晚期随访的指征。文献中最新的证据已经能够确认并可能修改以前的建议,更新它们,同样地就潜在的相关主题提出新的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guidelines on the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms: updates from the Italian Society of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (SICVE).
The objective of these Guidelines was to revise and update the previous 2016 Italian Guidelines on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Disease, in accordance with the National Guidelines System (SNLG), to guide every practitioner toward the most correct management pathway for this pathology. The methodology applied in this update was the GRADE-SIGN version methodology, following the instructions of the AGREE quality of reporting checklist as well. The first methodological step was the formulation of clinical questions structured according to the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) model according to which the Recommendations were issued. Then, systematic reviews of the Literature were carried out for each PICO question or for homogeneous groups of questions, followed by the selection of the articles and the assessment of the methodological quality for each of them using qualitative checklists. Finally, a Considered Judgment form was filled in for each clinical question, in which the features of the evidence as a whole are assessed to establish the transition from the level of evidence to the direction and strength of the recommendations. These guidelines outline the correct management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in terms of screening and surveillance. Medical management and indication for surgery are discussed, as well as preoperative assessment regarding patients' background and surgical risk evaluation. Once the indication for surgery has been established, the options for traditional open and endovascular surgery are described and compared, focusing specifically on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms as well. Finally, indications for early and late postoperative follow-up are explained. The most recent evidence in the Literature has been able to confirm and possibly modify the previous recommendations updating them, likewise to propose new recommendations on prospectively relevant topics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信