Zeynep Ummu Tursun, D. Tatar, N. Aksel, A. Ayrancı, A. Erbaycu, Y. Varol
{"title":"d-二聚体水平能预测肺癌患者肺血栓栓塞的诊断吗?","authors":"Zeynep Ummu Tursun, D. Tatar, N. Aksel, A. Ayrancı, A. Erbaycu, Y. Varol","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: In our study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of d-dimer level in patients with lung cancer, suspected pulmonary thromboembolism(PTE). Materials and Methods: The cases followed-up with lung cancer diagnosis between 2012-2017 were examined retrospectively. A total of 126 cancer patients diagnosed with PTE were included in the study. A total of 101 lung cancer patients without PTE formed control group. Results: A total of 227 lung cancer patients were included in the study. In the group with PTE, consisting of 126 cases, 102 cases were male (81%), 24 were female (19%) and mean age was 61,5 (± 8,91) years. In control group, consisting of 101 cases, 84 of cases were male (83,2%), 17 were female (16,8%) and mean age was 62,5 (±8,72) years. No statistically significant difference was identified between groups with regard to age, sex, cancer stage and comorbidity. While mean level of d-dimer was 4910,67± 5665 ng/dl in PTE group (median 2916; min. 169- max. 45000 ng/dl), mean level was 1917,78± 2122 ng/dl in control group (median 1196; min. 44- max. 1000 ng/dl) (p Conclusion: Although d-dimer values were higher in lung cancer patients, who developed PTE, no “cut off” value was determined as predictive for diagnosis of PTE.","PeriodicalId":432006,"journal":{"name":"General practice and primary care","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does d-dimer level predict pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosis in patients with lung cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Ummu Tursun, D. Tatar, N. Aksel, A. Ayrancı, A. Erbaycu, Y. Varol\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: In our study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of d-dimer level in patients with lung cancer, suspected pulmonary thromboembolism(PTE). Materials and Methods: The cases followed-up with lung cancer diagnosis between 2012-2017 were examined retrospectively. A total of 126 cancer patients diagnosed with PTE were included in the study. A total of 101 lung cancer patients without PTE formed control group. Results: A total of 227 lung cancer patients were included in the study. In the group with PTE, consisting of 126 cases, 102 cases were male (81%), 24 were female (19%) and mean age was 61,5 (± 8,91) years. In control group, consisting of 101 cases, 84 of cases were male (83,2%), 17 were female (16,8%) and mean age was 62,5 (±8,72) years. No statistically significant difference was identified between groups with regard to age, sex, cancer stage and comorbidity. While mean level of d-dimer was 4910,67± 5665 ng/dl in PTE group (median 2916; min. 169- max. 45000 ng/dl), mean level was 1917,78± 2122 ng/dl in control group (median 1196; min. 44- max. 1000 ng/dl) (p Conclusion: Although d-dimer values were higher in lung cancer patients, who developed PTE, no “cut off” value was determined as predictive for diagnosis of PTE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General practice and primary care\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General practice and primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General practice and primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa5011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does d-dimer level predict pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosis in patients with lung cancer?
Aim: In our study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic contribution of d-dimer level in patients with lung cancer, suspected pulmonary thromboembolism(PTE). Materials and Methods: The cases followed-up with lung cancer diagnosis between 2012-2017 were examined retrospectively. A total of 126 cancer patients diagnosed with PTE were included in the study. A total of 101 lung cancer patients without PTE formed control group. Results: A total of 227 lung cancer patients were included in the study. In the group with PTE, consisting of 126 cases, 102 cases were male (81%), 24 were female (19%) and mean age was 61,5 (± 8,91) years. In control group, consisting of 101 cases, 84 of cases were male (83,2%), 17 were female (16,8%) and mean age was 62,5 (±8,72) years. No statistically significant difference was identified between groups with regard to age, sex, cancer stage and comorbidity. While mean level of d-dimer was 4910,67± 5665 ng/dl in PTE group (median 2916; min. 169- max. 45000 ng/dl), mean level was 1917,78± 2122 ng/dl in control group (median 1196; min. 44- max. 1000 ng/dl) (p Conclusion: Although d-dimer values were higher in lung cancer patients, who developed PTE, no “cut off” value was determined as predictive for diagnosis of PTE.