自然写作:书的荒野

Don Scheese
{"title":"自然写作:书的荒野","authors":"Don Scheese","doi":"10.2307/3983707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bulow Hammock: Mind in a Forest. By David Rains Wallace. San Francisco, California: Sierra Club Books, 1988. 170 pp. Bibliography. $17.95. \"I want to be a nature writer;' Loren Eiseley declared as a youth, adding, \"it is my duty to do what I can to make people realize that the wild creature has just as much right to live as you or I\" (The Lost Notebooks of Loren Eiseley, p. 14). Judging by the profusion in bookstores these days of new (and old) works of nature writing, many authors have experienced a similar urge to speak on behalf of the rights of nature. The popularity of nature writing today rivals that at the turn of the century, when the books of John Burroughs, Ernest Thompson Seton, and Jack London were best sellers and \"nature study\" was a fad among middle-class Americans. True, the current resident of the White House is not nearly as involved in the \"back-to-nature cult\" as was Teddy Roosevelt, himself a highly regarded writer on the outdoors. But in our age of ecological crisis, when Time proclaimed \"The Endangered Earth\" as \"Planet of the Year\" for 1988, increasingly more readers are turning to nature writing for information, adventure, and hope. A sure indication of nature writing's renaissance is its tendency toward selfreflection. Consider, for example, the considerable attention paid in the most current of the works reviewed here to the distinction between the terms \"natural history\" and \"nature writing;' designations that have overlapping as well as distinctive meanings. According to William Beebe in the introduction to The Book of Naturalists, \"natural history,\" broadly defined, is the expression of a general interest in nature. The genre dates as far back as Paleolithic cave paintings and thus, along with poetry, is one of our oldest art forms. Natural history acquired its modern meaning in the eighteenth century following two developments: the discovery of many New World species of flora and fauna, and the emergence, thanks to Linnaeus, of a standardized scientific nomenclature. By Darwin's time \"natural history\" had come to mean writing \"concerned with the observation of living animals and plants in their natural wild state;' writing which, like literature, is intended to produce aesthetic and emotional effects but Nature Writing: A Wilderness of Books","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature Writing: A Wilderness of Books\",\"authors\":\"Don Scheese\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/3983707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bulow Hammock: Mind in a Forest. By David Rains Wallace. San Francisco, California: Sierra Club Books, 1988. 170 pp. Bibliography. $17.95. \\\"I want to be a nature writer;' Loren Eiseley declared as a youth, adding, \\\"it is my duty to do what I can to make people realize that the wild creature has just as much right to live as you or I\\\" (The Lost Notebooks of Loren Eiseley, p. 14). Judging by the profusion in bookstores these days of new (and old) works of nature writing, many authors have experienced a similar urge to speak on behalf of the rights of nature. The popularity of nature writing today rivals that at the turn of the century, when the books of John Burroughs, Ernest Thompson Seton, and Jack London were best sellers and \\\"nature study\\\" was a fad among middle-class Americans. True, the current resident of the White House is not nearly as involved in the \\\"back-to-nature cult\\\" as was Teddy Roosevelt, himself a highly regarded writer on the outdoors. But in our age of ecological crisis, when Time proclaimed \\\"The Endangered Earth\\\" as \\\"Planet of the Year\\\" for 1988, increasingly more readers are turning to nature writing for information, adventure, and hope. A sure indication of nature writing's renaissance is its tendency toward selfreflection. Consider, for example, the considerable attention paid in the most current of the works reviewed here to the distinction between the terms \\\"natural history\\\" and \\\"nature writing;' designations that have overlapping as well as distinctive meanings. According to William Beebe in the introduction to The Book of Naturalists, \\\"natural history,\\\" broadly defined, is the expression of a general interest in nature. The genre dates as far back as Paleolithic cave paintings and thus, along with poetry, is one of our oldest art forms. Natural history acquired its modern meaning in the eighteenth century following two developments: the discovery of many New World species of flora and fauna, and the emergence, thanks to Linnaeus, of a standardized scientific nomenclature. By Darwin's time \\\"natural history\\\" had come to mean writing \\\"concerned with the observation of living animals and plants in their natural wild state;' writing which, like literature, is intended to produce aesthetic and emotional effects but Nature Writing: A Wilderness of Books\",\"PeriodicalId\":425736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest and Conservation History\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest and Conservation History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

比洛吊床:森林中的心灵。大卫·雷恩斯·华莱士著。旧金山,加利福尼亚:塞拉俱乐部图书,1988。170页。参考书目。17.95美元。“我想成为一名自然作家,”罗兰·艾斯利年轻时宣称,并补充说,“尽我所能让人们意识到野生动物和你我一样有生存的权利,这是我的责任。”(《罗兰·艾斯利遗失的笔记》,第14页)。从这些天书店里丰富的关于自然的新(旧)作品来看,许多作家都经历过类似的冲动,要代表自然的权利说话。在世纪之交,约翰·巴勒斯、欧内斯特·汤普森·西顿和杰克·伦敦的书都是畅销书,“自然研究”在美国中产阶级中是一种时尚。诚然,现任白宫主人不像泰迪·罗斯福(Teddy Roosevelt)那样热衷于“回归自然崇拜”,罗斯福本人就是一位备受推崇的户外作家。但在我们这个生态危机的时代,当《时代》杂志宣布“濒临灭绝的地球”为1988年的“年度行星”时,越来越多的读者转向自然写作,寻求信息、冒险和希望。自然写作复兴的一个确切迹象是它趋向于自我反思。考虑一下,例如,在这里回顾的大多数最新作品中,对“自然历史”和“自然写作”这两个术语之间的区别给予了相当大的关注;这两个术语既有重叠又有独特的含义。根据威廉·毕比在《博物学家之书》的导言中所说,“博物历史”的广义定义是对自然的普遍兴趣的表达。这一流派可以追溯到旧石器时代的洞穴壁画,因此,与诗歌一起,是我们最古老的艺术形式之一。自然史的现代意义是在18世纪的两个发展之后获得的:一是发现了许多新大陆的动植物物种,二是由于林奈的缘故,出现了一种标准化的科学命名法。到了达尔文的时代,“博物学”的意思已经变成了“观察野生动物和植物的自然状态”,像文学一样,写作的目的是产生美学和情感效果,而《自然写作:书的荒野》则不同
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature Writing: A Wilderness of Books
Bulow Hammock: Mind in a Forest. By David Rains Wallace. San Francisco, California: Sierra Club Books, 1988. 170 pp. Bibliography. $17.95. "I want to be a nature writer;' Loren Eiseley declared as a youth, adding, "it is my duty to do what I can to make people realize that the wild creature has just as much right to live as you or I" (The Lost Notebooks of Loren Eiseley, p. 14). Judging by the profusion in bookstores these days of new (and old) works of nature writing, many authors have experienced a similar urge to speak on behalf of the rights of nature. The popularity of nature writing today rivals that at the turn of the century, when the books of John Burroughs, Ernest Thompson Seton, and Jack London were best sellers and "nature study" was a fad among middle-class Americans. True, the current resident of the White House is not nearly as involved in the "back-to-nature cult" as was Teddy Roosevelt, himself a highly regarded writer on the outdoors. But in our age of ecological crisis, when Time proclaimed "The Endangered Earth" as "Planet of the Year" for 1988, increasingly more readers are turning to nature writing for information, adventure, and hope. A sure indication of nature writing's renaissance is its tendency toward selfreflection. Consider, for example, the considerable attention paid in the most current of the works reviewed here to the distinction between the terms "natural history" and "nature writing;' designations that have overlapping as well as distinctive meanings. According to William Beebe in the introduction to The Book of Naturalists, "natural history," broadly defined, is the expression of a general interest in nature. The genre dates as far back as Paleolithic cave paintings and thus, along with poetry, is one of our oldest art forms. Natural history acquired its modern meaning in the eighteenth century following two developments: the discovery of many New World species of flora and fauna, and the emergence, thanks to Linnaeus, of a standardized scientific nomenclature. By Darwin's time "natural history" had come to mean writing "concerned with the observation of living animals and plants in their natural wild state;' writing which, like literature, is intended to produce aesthetic and emotional effects but Nature Writing: A Wilderness of Books
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信