Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen
{"title":"对于骨盆或髋臼骨折患者,通常不需要麻醉药物来控制疼痛","authors":"Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen","doi":"10.55576/job.v3i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.\n \nDesign: Retrospective case series.\n \nSetting: Level I Trauma Center\n \nPatients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)\n \nIntervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.\n \nMain Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up.\nMeasurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.\n \nResults: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries. Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation. The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups\n \nConclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.\n \nLevel of Evidence: IV; case series\n \nKeywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schedule II Narcotics are often Unnecessary for Pain Control in Patients with Pelvic or Acetabular Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.55576/job.v3i1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.\\n \\nDesign: Retrospective case series.\\n \\nSetting: Level I Trauma Center\\n \\nPatients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)\\n \\nIntervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.\\n \\nMain Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up.\\nMeasurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.\\n \\nResults: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries. Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation. The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups\\n \\nConclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.\\n \\nLevel of Evidence: IV; case series\\n \\nKeywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures\",\"PeriodicalId\":152360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v3i1.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v3i1.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Schedule II Narcotics are often Unnecessary for Pain Control in Patients with Pelvic or Acetabular Fractures
Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.
Design: Retrospective case series.
Setting: Level I Trauma Center
Patients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)
Intervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.
Main Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up.
Measurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.
Results: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries. Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation. The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups
Conclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.
Level of Evidence: IV; case series
Keywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures