对于骨盆或髋臼骨折患者,通常不需要麻醉药物来控制疼痛

Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen
{"title":"对于骨盆或髋臼骨折患者,通常不需要麻醉药物来控制疼痛","authors":"Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen","doi":"10.55576/job.v3i1.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.\n \nDesign: Retrospective case series.\n \nSetting: Level I Trauma Center\n \nPatients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)\n \nIntervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.\n \nMain Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up.\nMeasurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.\n \nResults: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries.  Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation.  The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups\n \nConclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.\n \nLevel of Evidence: IV; case series\n \nKeywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures","PeriodicalId":152360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schedule II Narcotics are often Unnecessary for Pain Control in Patients with Pelvic or Acetabular Fractures\",\"authors\":\"Soumitra Lele, Benjamin R. Childs, Isaac Fernandez, Michael S Reich, M. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.55576/job.v3i1.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.\\n \\nDesign: Retrospective case series.\\n \\nSetting: Level I Trauma Center\\n \\nPatients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)\\n \\nIntervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.\\n \\nMain Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up.\\nMeasurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.\\n \\nResults: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries.  Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation.  The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups\\n \\nConclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.\\n \\nLevel of Evidence: IV; case series\\n \\nKeywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures\",\"PeriodicalId\":152360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v3i1.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v3i1.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定骨盆和髋臼骨折患者出院后是否需要预定的II麻醉。设计:回顾性病例系列。环境:一级创伤中心患者:124例连续手术治疗的骨盆(OTA 61B或C)和髋臼骨折(OTA 62A, 62B或C)患者干预:出院时处方多模式口服疼痛方案,只有在需要控制疼痛时才使用II级麻醉。主要结局:主要结局定义为出院时或随访时需要第II类麻醉药品。测量:在随访时开具麻醉药处方或因疼痛控制不充分而返回急诊室。视觉模拟疼痛量表评分。结果:92例患者(74%)纳入最终分析,其中髋臼骨折25例,骨盆骨折50例,合并损伤17例。多发伤64例(69.6%)。4例(4.3%)患者出院时使用了附表II麻醉品。其余88例患者中,2例(2.2%)在出院后需要延迟处方附表II麻醉药品,5例(5.4%)到急诊科进行疼痛控制。没有因疼痛再入院。92例患者中有81例(88.0%)疼痛得到控制,无II期麻醉或ED表现。术后5 ~ 21天患者VAS疼痛评分均值为4.1±3.6,22 ~ 60天疼痛评分均值为3.2±3.4,大于60 ~ 180天疼痛评分均值为2.7±3.3,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:术后即刻随访不加二级麻醉的多模式疼痛控制方案可有效控制大多数骨盆或髋臼骨折患者的疼痛。证据等级:四级;关键词:麻醉药,疼痛控制,髋臼骨折,骨盆骨折
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schedule II Narcotics are often Unnecessary for Pain Control in Patients with Pelvic or Acetabular Fractures
Objectives: Determine if patients with pelvic and acetabular fractures require scheduled II narcotics after discharge.   Design: Retrospective case series.   Setting: Level I Trauma Center   Patients: 124 consecutive patients with operatively managed pelvic (OTA 61B or C) and acetabular fractures (OTA 62A, 62B or C)   Intervention: A multimodal oral pain regimen was prescribed at discharge with schedule II narcotic only if needed for pain control.   Main Outcome: Primary outcomes were defined as the need for schedule II narcotic at discharge or in follow up. Measurements: Prescription of narcotic on follow up or return to ER for inadequate pain control. Visual Analog Pain Scale score.   Results: Ninety-two patients (74%) with adequate follow-up were included for the final analysis, including patients with 25 acetabular fractures, 50 pelvic fractures, and 17 combined injuries.  Sixty-four patients (69.6%) were multiply-injured patients. Four (4.3%) patients were discharged with a Schedule II narcotic. Of the remaining patients (n=88), two (2.2%) required delayed prescription of a Schedule II narcotic after discharge and 5 (5.4%) presented to the ED for pain control. There were no readmissions for pain. Overall 81 of 92 (88.0%) patients had pain controlled without schedule II narcotics or ED presentation.  The mean VAS pain score for all patients was 4.1±3.6 from 5 to 21 days, 3.2±3.4 at 22 to 60 days, and 2.7±3.3 at greater than 60 to 180 days after discharge, there was no significant difference between groups   Conclusion: Multimodal pain control regimens without schedule II narcotics in the immediate postoperative follow-up period can be effective in managing pain in the majority of patients with pelvic or acetabular fractures.   Level of Evidence: IV; case series   Keywords: narcotics, pain control, acetabular fractures, pelvic fractures
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信